No, as with most everything you post you either willfully or ignorantly twist what was actually in the documents. Jackson herself has said that...
Sure, the classification is mentioned so that they can show that the documents were related to the national defense. The statute he is charged...
They splay the documents to show where the material was found in relation to other documents in the box. Of course they are not going to take...
He is charged with "Willful retention of documents relating to the National Defense". I somehow do not think anything related to "Crossfire...
Explain what? That they used folders as place keepers when they found classified documents? What needs to be explained?...
I don't care what you would, or would not, put "past the FBI" The question is, as it always should be, do you have evidence that they DID plant...
They didn't need to plant evidence. THAT'S WHY THEY DIDN'T PLANT EVIDENCE.
Nothing screams democracy like allowing autocratic leaders to do what they want and then complain when the government wants to hold them accountable.
Nope, the PRA defines what is "Personal" and what is "Presidential", period. The President has NO authority to declare what the PRA defines as...
And we only have you and other Trump sycophants telling us that the FBI is corrupt. And, once again...for the 10,000th time....IT DOESN'T MATTER...
Yes, it is EXACTLY the same thing Both are promising to do something they see as needing to be done. You don't see it as analogous because the...
When someone runs to "close the border" does that mean that their actions to close the border are motivated ONLY by politics? Or is it possible...
Except that they DID have access to the records that proved wrong doing. That's how these things work.
Agreed, when people acknowledge the obvious it is much easier to have a productive discussion. The problem is that far too many people are...
This is just unbelievable. Un-freaking-believable. I thought this was supposed to be a forum where we discussed FACTS But no, popscott has...
No
No, it does not. It looks like TRUMP is crooked...but that really isn't a surprise to anyone who has followed him since the 90s
You know what, I'm tired of all the "legal experts" here spewing their opinions like it means something. I am trained in the operation of a...
Yep, a judge with 15 years on the felony bench, with no ethics complaints against him is now all of sudden "crooked". Meanwhile a man who has a...
The meetings between Trump, Cohen and Weisselberg prove that the payments were to help Trump get elected and that Trump was up to it to his...
Because we (you included) are so much better versed in the law than the DA or the Judge (or even Trump's own lawyers who have not brought up this...
Cohen IS a dirt bag. No one is denying that. And guess what, dirt bags tend to work for other dirt bags.
What is the problem with holding "President Trump accountable"? Shouldn't ALL Presidents be "held accountable" if they've done something illegal?...
For what purpose? Does Romney feel that Presidents and Ex Presidents are somehow above the law? That holding them accountable for illegal actions...
Yep, every single investigation into Trump is "politically motivated" Hundreds of people (maybe even thousands) involved in a conspiracy to "get...
Separate names with a comma.