Zero Evidence that 9/11 Was an Inside Job

Absurd statement. Why are you having so much trouble presenting credible evidence that 9/11 was an inside job? What are the key facts and evidence you speak of?

 

What does being an expert pilot have to do with recognizing the debris of a certain airliner? I'd rather hear what a Boeing engineer has to say about the pictures of the debris.

What pilots?

What top ranking military officials?

What testimony?

All you've done is make extremely vague claims that are unverifiable.

 

What I have found with people that refuse to accept the possibility of something other than what we were "officially" told on 9/11, is that you would stick to your opinion, regardless of the proof offered. Isn't that true with you as well?

What "proof" would you accept...specifically? I'm curious. Could there be anything that you would consider? I mean, we're not going to get a collective "yeah...we did it" response from anyone "official", so, absent that, WHAT would you accept? My guess is nothing.

 

Now THIS is a good question. I'd like to expand upon this. What is the official explanation for it?

 

I'm guessing none. Usually when people are in denial they repeat the same drivel over and over again.

"Where are your facts? I have none but where are yours?!!!"

 

Why don't you start with the evidence we DO have? That being "official" explanations offered, non verifiable stories, the lack of photographic evidence of "official" claims (like the 3 frames of nonsense offered as "proof" of Flight 77 at the Pentagon, or "proof" that Flight 93 was "buried" in Shanksville). Start with what is SUPPOSED to be known and go from there.
The "official" story is so full of holes and contradictions (lies), one would have to be extremely gullible (at best) to believe any of it after they try to verify what is put out as "official".
An open mind and objectivity is all that is required to conclude that the "official" BS story is complete BS. If you've resigned yourself to NOT believing anything because it's so outrageous or difficult to believe, then, there is no point in trying to convince you otherwise, because your mind is closed. Period.

 

Ridiculous claim. If you bothered to read the thread, you'd find that I agreed that it was very likely the government engaged in some form of coverup in order to deceive the 9/11 commission about who knew what and when they knew it.

No, it's not. I always revise my position when proof is presented that contradicts my beliefs. The problem is that conjecture and baseless claims are not "proof" as so many people seem to think.

How about testimony from real engineers. Or explanations that don't contradict basic logic. Internet videos, blogs created from uncredible sources, and explanations that are completely illogical are bad ways to start.

Your guess is wrong.

 

No it hasn't.

No it didn't.

 

Really? So, first responders testimony contradicting the "official" story you would accept? Engineers? There are plenty of them. Plenty of internet videos that contradict "official" conclusions as well.

My original guess stands correct. You will only acknowledge a pro "official" argument because your mind is already made up. Admit at least that much.

 

A Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon. Anyone can see that by this picture. Look at the hole. Isn't it obvious? How could anyone think otherwise?

 

Oh no. You're not getting off that easy. If you think posting a 5 minute video of a guy rapidly raining down an exhorbitant amount of information is going to scare me away, you're wrong.

Here's what's going to happen. Since you're such an expert on this topic, we're going to break down that video piece by piece, and discuss every single claim and implication he makes. You're going to provide me with credible sources to verify what he says is accurate. If you're incapable of doing that, I will have no reason to believe that the guy who made that video is not just making up certain things.

 

I already did. A lone ex-FBI agent claiming that the FBI provided explosives for the 93 WTC bombing is not evidence that the govt was directly involved in 9/11.

 

What hole? Where's the plane? an engine turbine? bodies on the ground? seats thrown everywhere?

You are looking at something totally different than I am.

 

Amazing how you're incapable of disproving the Zapruder film. Color me shocked.

 

Non sequitor. 9/11 is a large scale atrocity. Your argument here is basically that since the government has committed small scale atrocities against Americans, therefore this is proof that the government committed the large scale atrocity of 9/11 against Americans.

 

So 9/11 was a Jew conspiracy? Are you suggesting that our government is controlled by Jews?

Prove that Jews were told to not go into work that day.

 

I think (officially) that they said it disintegrated/evaporated or some such equally as ridiculous claim.

 

Start a new thread on it, I'll chime in. are you claiming LHO acted alone?

if so, pull your pants down now because I'm about to flog you on this one.

 

a Boeing 757? Nooooooo way........LOL

 

Why don't you focus on particulars of 9/11, rather than focusing on "Jews"?
You'd rather not....I completely understand.

 

There you go again, making way too much sense.

 

Exactly!!

And how about those spools of wire that were right in the path, yet remained undisturbed?

 

You can't see the plane parts??? Why sir...they're all over the place in that photo. You must just be one of those "conspiracy theorists". LOL

 

If they had trillions of dollars, why would they make it look like they botched the coverup if they were really trying to cover up government involvement in 9/11?

 

The magic plane must have flown around them before impact huh? LOL