Commission report ommitted and ignored, but defended vigorously by shills

Discussion in '9/11' started by RtWngaFraud, May 25, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    We often hear from the shills pretending to want folks seeking the truth to point out where the the "official" BS story (aka the 9/11 Commission Report), is wrong. While there are many examples of this, there are bigger examples of the BS report lacking information. No bigger instance of it than right here:

    http://911truthnews.com/death-of-bin-laden-may-distract-from-a-more-disturbing-story/


    The criminals that were involved in this "official" BS report knew full well about Pakistan's intelligence issues, and chose to ignore them, just like they ignored most everything else of major consequence in that BS report. The shills will continue to defend it (the BS report), and defend everything and anything that protects the "official" BS story. Paid propaganda in all its glory, for all to see.
    Wake up America.
     
  2. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The 9/11 Commission Report remains 100% accurate on all major points.
    No inaccuracies exist.
     
  3. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well, maybe that's where the shill got me. What they consider "major". There might be a sentence or two in there (besides the date maybe) that they consider "major". Omitted pertinent information, like why the ISI "problem areas" was ignored. Just a minor point I guess, not worth mentioning.
     
  4. I_Gaze_At_The_Blue

    I_Gaze_At_The_Blue New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,988
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yet RtWngaFraud still cannot point out to one substantive thing the report got wrong ... oh! lots of whining and empty rhetoric ... just nothing factual.

    Figures !!!
     
  5. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    63
    what cracks me up about the shills here is you give them facts that evebn members of the commission themselves said that there were omissions and the commmsion was compromised from the beginning and yes the shills still defend the report to no end.:-D their handlers pay them well obviously.:mrgreen:
     
  6. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Feel free to mention it...you have an adverse reaction to taking anything seriously; it would be a refreshing change for you.

    Any word on the light poles yet?
     
  7. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The magic light poles? Nope. All available video remains confiscated still. It "disappeared" too.
     
  8. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    All available videos were released a while back. You just didn't catch it after supposedly "researching" it for 10 years. If it doesn't fit; you obviously forget.

    Anyway, how about the light poles...any word on what knocked them down if it wasn't AA77?
     
  9. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "Available" would be the key word.
     
  10. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I apologize that I am bumping an old thread (mod team), but RTW, would you mind making a list for me? Please, would you enumerate, in as much detail as possible, all the ways the 9/11 Commission Report is 'wrong'.
     
  11. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Be happy to Jango.

    http://www.serendipity.li/wot/571-page-lie.htm

    David Ray has also written a great book on this subject entitled "The 9/11 Commission Report, Omissions and Distortions" which I have read and own, so I can reference it if you have any further questions (should the link not suffice for some reason).

    One note on David Ray. Folks here like to tear him down as someone who's dishonest, treacherous, or whatever. I find him to be very credible and I consider him very well informed on 9/11. Oh...he's a Theologian too. (I guess that accounts for his "treachery"). LOL Good day.
     
  12. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Of course you would worship David Ray. He is a proven liar. Heaven forbid you ever worship someone with credibility. Do you still worship Fetzer too even though he has exposed himself for what he truly is to the point even YOU saw it?
     
  13. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wow...I didn't realize that. What did he SPECIFICALLY lie about? (if you could be so kind as to illuminate me, so I can change my opinion).
     
  14. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I will give you one whopper. Defend it if you can. DRG says the hijackers are still alive.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9kEwQud4Ek&feature=player_embedded

    At the 2:30 mark.

    This was from March of 2010, so it isn't like the facts about the "alive" hijackers haven't been beaten to death and he wouldn't be aware of the true facts. This is a perfect example of the kind of incredible dishonesty one regularly encounters from truthers.
     
  15. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0


    I believe he means the individuals NAMED incorrectly as hijackers is what he is advocating as being alive and well.
     
  16. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nice attempt at rewording what he said so that he might retain some small shred of credibility, but that isn't what he said at all. He was VERY clear as to who he was talking about.

    Isn't it funny how DRG can quote the BBC when they report news that was reported accurately but incorrect? Original article Yet DRG can't be bothered with clarifications from the same BBC because they refute his fantastic claims that helps him dishonestly sell books. Clarification here.


    This was cleared up beyond any doubt shortly after 9/11. Waleed A. Al Shehri (alive) is not the same as Waleed M. Al Shehri (dead) the hijacker. Waleed M Al Shehri was not a pilot, he was muscle. Waleed A. Al Shehri is a pilot.

    [​IMG]
    Do these look like the same man to you?

    Even Embry Riddle, the school Waleed A. Al Shehri went to, commented on the facts.

    First news
    Clarification

    This is EASY stuff to verify. The names didn't match. The pictures didn't match. DRG lied his ass off about what the BBC said as the BBC article was put out BEFORE the FBI put out the pictures. Want MORE proof DRG is lying his ass off about the hijackers being alive? IF he actually believes that the hijackers are alive, why has he not even TRIED to either contact them or find them? Put yourself in his shoes. You're trying to make a name for yourself so you can sell lots and lots of books. You're trying to prove the government is lying. You have a MASSIVE lie (if true) in ANY of the hijackers being alive that INSTANTLY destroys the government's entire case. Yet neither DRG or any other truther has made the attempt to find the alive hijackers. Why? They KNOW they are lying. They are just hoping nobody else notices the fact they are lying and know they are lying.

    The one thing that is just as certain as DRG lying his ass off is that he was NOT referring to the "individuals NAMED incorrectly as hijackers". I am wondering if you even watched the video as one cannot logically come to the conclusion you did after watching the video.
     
  17. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Come on, RWAF. Either prove DRG was telling the truth or admit he is a liar. You wanted proof. I've given you a prime example.
     
  18. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    RWAF, why have you abandoned this thread when you specifically demanded proof DRG is a liar? I've given you the proof. You can't refute it, yet you continue to worship DRG as a "Godsend". Do men of God lie in order to make their points? I am pretty sure God frowns on liars.
     
  19. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I've answered that Pat. He was referring to the incorrectly (wrong) names of the hijackers that the goob used. Made up names that turned out to be actual people. The "proof" is the names listed by our goob were inaccurate. THAT was the point, despite your re-characterization attempt.
     
  20. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The man isn't the liar here. He speaks truth. Anybody can check him, his credentials and his opinions out for themselves easily enough. I'm very comfortable with my interpretation of his statements. They're consistent, and they're honest.
     
  21. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Bull(*)(*)(*)(*). He says nothing of the kind and even gives an example as I showed you. Thank you for this though. It is not often one gets an example as good as this as to just what lengths truthers will go to cover up their lies.

    All one has to do is read word for word exactly what DRG said and then your pathetic lie about what you think he was really trying to say if he weren't so bat(*)(*)(*)(*) crazy.

    It doesn't take a genius to see your madeup bull(*)(*)(*)(*) for what DRG was really saying doesn't hold water either. Made up names? So the government just made up 19 names and hoped nobody would notice? What about the people who dealt with Mohammed Atta for years? What about the pilots who went to flight school? Did all the instructors make them up as well?
     
  22. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0


    Is that the "official" take on DRG? Because you say so, right? Good thing individuals can think for themselves, and not be bound to "official" BS, wouldn't you agree? As to your continuing rant...what is it that another team player often propagates....Oh...I know..a "straw man" argument.
     
  23. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Belated thanks for the list RTW.
     
  24. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Here's what I've found so far about the 9/11 Commission Report:




    Oh. I thought this stuck out as odd:
     
  25. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This coming from a guy who can't even defend his hero without rewriting what he clearly stated! :lol: Why is it you continue to run from the lies DRG and you write?
     

Share This Page