Zimmerman lies about finances in court

Have you notice none of them have to balls to admit Z's outright deception in his first court appearance? Even after it is a proven fact Z knew about the $$$ they still try to make excuses for him. Why? They have invested in his innocence so much they can't openly admit they backed a liar.

We have been correct because we have been looking at ALL the facts.

Just remembered something. That current narrative is Z was returning to his truck after he lost sight of T, when T attacked him. We know Z lost sight of him while on the phone with dispatch so that means Z MUST have been returning as soon as he got off the phone. But the ex Chief of police and Z's dad both said that after Z got off the phone he continued looking for T for an address to give to the cops. Hmmm...

 

It became illegal for Z when T ran away and Z got out of his vehicle and continued to pursue on foot. But don't let facts get in your way.

Great illustration of the dishonest dancing to defend Z. It is claimed we don't know if Z "pulled" his gun. Gee Gomer. Did he pull the trigger with the gun still in the holster? Maybe it was a magical curvy bullet???

 

Do you have any freaking clue about the fact you get the money back when you go to court when you are supposed to???????? It wouldn't have sucked up anything from the defense fund.........blimey Z supporters are very creative when it comes to finding a way to make excuses for his dishonesty.

 

I don't care if you believe it or not because if you really wanted to know you could have easily Bingoogled it yourself. Basically, unless we can give you a video.....oops.....nope......video evidence isn't good enough for you guys either......

 

Unfortunately, for you it is like crying wolf. Everything Z does is a lie according to you, regardless of the facts.

 

We were discussintg a hypothetical where-

einstein.

 

I have never accused him of lying without the evidence showing he lied. Your inability to honestly address the facts does not make them disappear.

 

You mean that evidence you make up? LOL

 

You claimed he is being falsely prosecuted and now that you have been busted you want to pretend you never actually said it. Between this, texmaster saying no one said T should have run away, and a few other examples, it is pretty clear nobody defending him can do it while being honest and addressing all the facts. This is why Z is toast. If it really was SD and if he really was a stand up guy, you people wouldn't have to make fools of yourselves defending his dishonesty on a daily basis.

 

More dishonesty. It has become quite clear most people defending Z are not worth having their posts quoted because they simply ignore the facts and employ hypocrisy on a breathing basis.

 

Poor Sky, you have so much of yourself wrapped up in this. You need to get out and meet people and have some fun.

 

You are not the sharpest crayon in the box. Never denied saying it. Fully admit that I did. And pointed out, by quoting the very post I both quoted and responded to, that we were discussing a hypothetical where "even if it was self defense". Which part dont you understand?

 

Have you noticed none of his supporters care about the missing $45,000????? That is not living expenses for a couple of weeks unless your name is Charlie Sheen.

 

Much to do about nothing.

"O'Mara claimed the family was not trying to be deceptive, but Florida Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester said he wanted to know more about the money. O'Mara doesn't think the judge will change Zimmerman's bond in light of the new information."

 

How do you know it is missing. If it was spent, it is not missing.

 

You tried to justify the $200,000 on the claim he is being FALSELY prosecuted. It's freaking hilarious your own words are right there and you still try to spin soon spin and hope if your posts are indignant enough that someone will believe you.

 

Gee. That's a nice neutral source you're using. I'm sure there is no conflict of interest there.......

They were deceptive because they claimed to be indigent at the bond hearing while KNOWING they had $200,000. That is freaking perjury.

 

What was it spent on Einstein?

 

I am sure you are going to tell us before you even know yourself.

 

The now-defunct website George Zimmerman set up to solicit donations raised more than $200,000 and Zimmeman's family used $5,000 from website donations, along with a second mortgage on a family home, to pay the 10% necessary to secure a bond for Zimmerman's $150,000 bail. But they would have to put up only $100,000 of a $1 million bail to secure a bond and the amount could be raised.

 

It really is cute how Z supporters try to bail each other out of their own false claims and dishonesty. Like watching tadpoles trying to push a Hummer.

 

Nonsense. You people cant even quote the statement of Zimmerman you allege to be a lie even though weve asked repeatedly. Man up! Grow some nads. Somebody quote what you are alleging to be a lie.

 

You are missing the point. At the bond hearing Z, his wife, and his parents all claimed he was indigent and HAD NO MONEY while knowing he had $200,000!!!!!! WTF is wrong with you people??????

 

And idiots have the right to say the same ignorant stuff you just did. As upset as you seem, you are really going to be seething when you have to pay a $100 to Tex when Zimmerman is set free. I have watched people like you attack people you only know of through the news, and what is disgusting, you act as if you have a personal relationship with them. It is an inherent trait of liberal loons

 

I have no idea. That is why I said it is missing and you are the one who claimed it isnt missing....