1. What does this post have to do with the testimony of Dick Oliver? 2. If someone used CGI to add a plane into a video, why would they have missed the frames you think the plane should be in?
Mark, cryptically laughs at the end of his description, further proving that he was describing the slow moving drone, and falling short of confirming that it really wasn't a plane. It's no different than Jean Hill saying she saw the secret service shooting back, but falling short of fingering the driver. Of course it didn't belong in the area because it was a drone and not the boeing 767 it was supposed to be. Eyewitness on 9/11 Mark Burnback was able to get a good view of the plane that hit the World Trade Center, because he said that the plane was flying very low. He explained to FOX News that the plane had no windows, a blue logo, and did not look like a commercial plane. Fox NewsCaster: "Mark Burnback, a Fox employee, is on the phone with us. Mark witnessed this... Mark were you close enough to see any markings on the airplane?" Mark Burnback: "Hi gentlemen. Yeah there was definitely a blue, circular logo on the front of the plane towards the front. It definitely did not look like a commercial plane. I did not see any windows on the side. It was definitely very low... "Mark, if what you say is true, those could be cargo planes or something like that. You said you did not see any windows on the side?" Mark Burnback: "I did not see any windows on the side. I saw the plane was flying low. I was probably a block away from the sub-way in Brooklyn and that plane came down very low, and again it was not a normal flight that I have ever seen at an airport. It was a plane with a blue logo on the front and it just looked like it did not belong in this area." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYUs9u1YwV0
I took the work from September Clues and transformed it into something more conclusive. Dick Oliver called the orb a remote controlled drone. He was on the ground and saw it floating just like it did in 4 live broadcasts. Dick was totally oblivious that his honest account completely destroyed the myth of a real plane impacting T2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DB-rwWeL7Sg&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=126&feature=plpp_video
The plane was not flown by poorly trained Arabs on a mission from Osama bin Laden because they hate our freedoms. Quotes from Flight Instructors: Mohammed Atta: His attention span was zero. Khalid Al-Mihdhar: We didnt kick him out, but he didnt live up to our standards. Marwan Al-Shehhi: He was dropped because of his limited English and incompetence at the controls. Salem Al-Hazmi: We advised him to quit after two lessons. Hani Hanjour: His English was horrible, and his mechanical skills were even worse. It was like he had hardly even ever driven a car. Im still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon. He could not fly at all. 9/11 Anomalies
More silly opinions with no proof to back it up. Think anyone is going to believe your opinions over the evidence? No? Me neither.
It took you guys 10 years to come up with this charade of a forum? Lets Roll forum....come people...hear and speak the truth! Screw these shills!!It's all government operated anyway. That's so friggin' obvious.
Well out of curiosity, I took a peek over there. Good Lord (faint). If you have trouble buying Fetzer's "no plane" theory, I don't think you will be very comfortable at the Let's Roll tin foil hat central forum. Fake smoke machines installed in the towers? Really? Those people make Judy Wood's directed energy weapon theory look completely logical compared to some of the crazy stories they are going on about over there. It's like a science fiction writers convention or something.
I was banned over at phils place.....you're not allowed to question strenuously the truther view over there he once had the opinion that the jumpers from the towers were fake too
Truther view is one thing . . . but what I read was complete lunacy. Hollow towers?? Paid actors?? An "inappropriate emotional response" is cited as hard evidence that the person being interviewed is a paid actor. What passes for logic over there is really amusing. I can see where facts and critical thinking would be a problem over there. Did he change his mind? Maybe I'm reading old posts. Granted I didn't spend too much time there. I see Jango is a member there. That explains a few things.
Dude, the plane is banking a little bit when we first see it. It was flying at aobut the altitude of the building on the left. That means it was turning somewhat. It was at all times hidden behind that building until we see it emerge.
7forever does not really understand how objects viewed from a distance by a TV camera pixelate and such. Or he does but he doesn't care. Here is a video effects expert explaining what really happened but I doubt 7forever will watch it. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4669137903152322593 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2432158918700622833
Horse feathers. I spent about 4 years as an Air Force fire fighter sitting right on the edge of the runway or some drop zone for all kinds of normal operations and air shows. That noise is unmistakeably an airliner. Cow cookies. People slowed down and their stride became less purposeful. They were confused. One lady stops at about 0:30 (you can see her framed between the man's legs) and looks up at the tower. They were gobsmacked. The camera was hand-held. Of course it is not going to remain stable. The crash is a lot louder than a car crash. But there is no sound of the sort of explosion that would be needed to do an SFX of all that jet fuel blowing up. They probably never heard an airliner at that range before,, and did not expect there to be one in lower Manhattan. It was probably a little hard to take in all at once. Horse hockey. There was a lot of water to turn to steam inside the building. The smoke looks normal to me. I used to go out and practice putting out thousand-plus gallon jet fuel fighters about once a month for four years. This is not anomolous.