UA 175: Who created this fake footage from this rare south view?

Discussion in '9/11' started by 7forever, Dec 1, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

?

Who altered this footage?

  1. Manos Megagiannis

    1 vote(s)
    25.0%
  2. A TV network like CNN

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. A law enforcement agency

    3 vote(s)
    75.0%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The video isn't fake but of very poor quality. There is no "orb" and have no idea what people are calling an orb. The plane is clearly in a left bank and continues across the first tower and hits the second. Here is another clear view from a similar angle but lower. Notice no orb, just a plane in a left bank hitting the second tower.

    The conspiracy is truly wacky.

    [video=youtube_share;XELamUnF0EU]http://youtu.be/XELamUnF0EU[/video]
     
  2. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    All 911 is fake and of very poor quality, except the footage of the orb. There is no "plane". The planes in all videos are clearly fake blobs with NO markings, therefore none can be verified as real boeings. There is another clear view from a similar angle but lower. Notice no markings, just a black blob in a left bank not crashing into the tower.
     
  3. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Well, of course. He's on your team. The side of eternal nonsense that never leads to a conclusion.
     
  4. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You need to read some more of his posts. He definitely thinks the government was behind 9/11. He just doesn't buy the complete lunacy of the video fakery angle.

    Having been called a shill and OCTA by him on numerous ocasions, I would hardly say he's "on my team" -- what ever team that is that you're talking about.

    Oh, you mean like orbs and every video in the world except the 4 that you cite were modified? That kind of external nonsense? Fetzer and his video fakery and paid actors? That nonsense?

    I think you have your "teams" mixed up.
     
  5. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You call it lunacy but fail to challenge the clear evidence of fakery. Any researcher who avoids facts is part of the coverup. You people go back and forth and put on a show that there's disagreement, all while ignoring evidence that no ledgible image of a boeing was captured for either tower. Not to mention that this thread started with a fake plane image circling the south tower with the camera facing north.
     
  6. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    911conspiracy.tv - 2nd WTC Attack Plane Crash Videos

    The orb circled the building just as many witnesses had stated and that is corroborated by 4 broadcasts showing it do just that from the north view. It's logical that with so much footage being released, something from the south would show its goofy wrap around, behind the towers.

    We don't get the orb here but a fake plane exacting it as it circled the Towers. It is most logical that Manos Megagiannis turned his footage over to law enforcement and got it back this way. This man clearly captured the weird object coming from over west (left of screen) before circling the buildings which is exactly why that whole part was edited out by starting the fake plane just as it passes east of Tower 1.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    41. Here is the story behind my videos: The distance is about 6 miles, (according to Google Earth), recorded using a Sony PC1. After I got a call from a friend of mine about the first plane, I started filming from inside my apartment. To get a bit better view I went to the roof of the building, and the moment I pointed the camera to the WTC and started recording, without even realizing it I captured the second plane hitting the tower. Actually if you see the original tape you will notice that I move the camera so I can confirm with my own eyes the explosion that I saw through the viewfinder. The rest is just very basic digital zoom (very amateurish I admit). The woman's voice, was some tenant in the same building.

    The videos have NOT being edited to make the plane disappear or anything like that (as some claim). One of these days, if I find some free time I may go back to the master and re-master the video.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZG25MRnPy1o&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=62&feature=plpp_video
     
  7. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    He's just trying to find any excuse to bump this moronic thread. Even resorting to cannibalism, it appears.
     
  8. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You posted gifs of a plane flying into the tower to show that a plane didn't fly into the tower. Your logic is faulty.

    You can't stay seven forever, you know. (oh wait ... I get your handle, now.)
     
  9. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    There is no clear evidence of fakery. Only unclear GIFs posted by someone who doesn't understand video resolution.
     
  10. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You've made an excuse and suggested you can debunk the obvious video proof of fakery. Go for it. There was blatant and obvious video fakery used on 911 and none of it has been challenged in any way. Do you grasp how utterly abusrd it is for you to answer for a so-called truther. He (RW whatever) won't answer because he can't challenge anything in this thread and takes a less absurd position than simple denialists like yourself. It's easier for him to ignore it.:oops:
     
  11. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You will never try and prove your moronic belief in planes hitting either tower because there isn't any that can't be laughed at.
     
  12. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    The OP is of a fake plane circling the tower. That is irrefutable proof of fakery and confirms that the orb did in fact circle the south tower.

    [​IMG]
     
  13. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    In other news, the earth is flat and 7forever has a low-res gifs to prove it.
     
  14. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Green tomato.

    [​IMG]
     
  15. nausmr

    nausmr New Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "The objective of disinformation is not to convince you of one point of view or another, it is to create enough uncertainty so that everything is believable and nothing is knowable."
     
  16. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Miss the point.
     
  17. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The plane in your gif doesn't circle the tower. Your argument suffers from a lack of veracity.
     
  18. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Show the 65 passengers boarding a 5 foot orb and then you got something. The negative to prove is that planes impacted three buildings. No credible photo or video shows any real plane and that's a fact. It all starts there and no group supporting the official myth of planes could get past it. The fakery used on 911 is just plain sad and would be laughed at by any neutral deciding body. Here we have a picture of a fake plane with the right engine impossibly close to the fuselage and the infamous orb, both of which could not be any more different in size and shape.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  19. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    '
    <sigh> The right engine is NOT 'impossibly close to the fuselage',the plane was banking to the LEFT.and perspective woumake the engine appear 'closer' than it really was.
    And there was NO orb,your crappy GIF's aside
     
  20. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Once again: you show pictures of a plane flying into a building in order to show a plane doesn't fly into a building.

    Do you see the flaw in your logic?
     
  21. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Answer your own delusions:

    Now, again, answer up:

    What happened to UA Flight 175 then? No one boarded it, seen it depart the gate, seen it take off. Where is the plane and all the people? No video of it or its passengers boarding exists.

    What happened to AA Flight 11 then? No one boarded it, seen it depart the gate, seen it take off. Where is the plane and all the people? No video of it or its passengers boarding exists.

    What happened to AA Flight 77 then? No one boarded it, seen it depart the gate, seen it take off. Where is the plane and all the people? No video of it or its passengers boarding exists.

    What happened to UA Flight 93 then? No one boarded it, seen it depart the gate, seen it take off. Where is the plane and all the people? No video of it or its passengers boarding exists.

    [​IMG]
     
  22. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There are witnesses to all of these events.

    Why did it take you six months to reply to this question?
     
  23. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So in your little truther world,if no video exists,it never happened,right?...<eyeroll>guess since no video exists of the drunk driver killing my aunt and almost killing me never happened,right?
     
  24. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Some people just never grow up. They remain seven forever.
     
  25. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    He's lying about his age to appear older....
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page