Dems Admit Obama’s Not Eligible

While he was in office, I never really cared much for Dubya…

But after four years of Obozo the semi-secret Nazi-Panther, I’m having pangs of nostalgia.

But then, the Democrats only have a two-cards in their deck, You’re-A-Racist and It’s-Bush’s-Fault...

 

Meh. I see precious little difference between the two.

 

Man- Obama sure wear's lots of hats- Muslim- Marxist-Nazi-Panther-Communist.....just roll out every label you hope people will find offensive and hope they will stick.

Meanwhile- back to the OP

What a joke.

 

Your lack of reading comprehension astounds me.

 

I don't care what color he is. What matters to me is that he's a Muslim loving socialist.

 

You would compare him to Jimmy Carter. They definitely two of a kind and I don't mean that in a good way.

 

And where does the quote you repeated contain an admission that Obama is not eligible?

I mean... Did you really think I didn't read that quote you repeated? I read it. It just doesn't say what you think it says. Which means --- no surprise --- you are the one with a reading comprehension problem.

Why don't you go and familiarize yourself with FRCP 12(b)(6), and the type of arguments a Defendant makes in a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(1), and come back when your posts will be slightly less embarrassing for yourself?

 

Jesusland. In the capital, Bibleopia.

 

I especially like that, in further evidence of how stupid birthers are, the OP's article says, "According to a motion filed by the party's attorneys..." and that phrase is a hyper link... To the Judge's Order, not the Party's Motion. The birthers are so (*)(*)(*)(*)ing stupid they couldn't even tell the difference between the Judge's Order and the Defendants' motion.

 

Did you know that the Birther Queen, Orly Taitz, ran against Barbra Boxer?

 

I heard she was running for something. She's hysterical.

I can't figure out whether she is really insane and stupid or ZOMG BEST (*)(*)(*)(*)ING TROLL EVAR!!>!>!1!1!!111!!

 

Man, she got SLAUGHTERED

 

Dude, you got to remember that birfers think Joe Arpio is a brilliant law enforcement officer.

It is true that the party can put whoever they choose on the ballot. It does not mean that the candidate can hold office after he is elected if it is established by legal means that he is ineligible.

All court cases that have been resolved have been decided in favor of his eligibility.

Thus a bunch of crazy teatards have no standing to exclude him.

 

They wouldn't be claiming the right to put in somebody that not eligible unless it's because their candidate, Obama, is ineligible. You do have a reading comprehension problem.

 

Now you are just dancing around trying to rationalize why you claimed that : "Dems Admit Obama’s Not Eligible" when of course that is an outright lie.

But that is what Birthers do.....they get defeated in court after court.....if they didn't lie about it what kind of victories could they try to proclaim to their gullible followers?

 

Sigh... I can see we're going to have to start with the basics here.

Ok. First: Do you understand that the quote in your OP where this is cited is not a quote from the Democratic party (or any party in the case) but instead from the Judge's Order granting Defendant's motion to dismiss? Yes or no?

[Hint: The text quoted in your OP is found in the link your OP provides, at the bottom of page 3/top of page 4]

 

How about a quote from the motion itself. Apparently you weren't basic enough but I will be.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/97824831/TN-WDTN-LLF-2012-06-21-Memorandum-ORDER-DISMISSING-CASE
http://www.scribd.com/doc/97824831/TN-WDTN-LLF-2012-06-21-Memorandum-ORDER-DISMISSING-CASE


Easy to locate it it splits the page right at Case 2:12-cv-02143-STA-cgc Document 31 Filed 06/21/12 Page 3 of 20 PageID 471

 

So you are admitting that your claim:
"Dems Admit Obama’s Not Eligible."

is just a lie?

 

No, I posted the quote.
Why would they argue being able to choose a candidate that's not qualified as being ok, unless their candidate, Obama, wasn't qualified. The implication is there.

 

Only in the hare brained minds of Birthers. After all they are the ones who take what they an 'implication' that only they see, and make the claim that Democrats said something that they didn't say.

 

Only a Democrat would not see the fact that they didn't imply it just like they would go around arguing over the definition of the word IS.

 

Actually no Republicans or Democrats see that...only a few Birther whackjobs and their attorneys. Let me know when Mitt Romney agrees with you- or even Sarah Palin or Michelle Bachmann.

Seriously if you are too crazy for Michelle Bachmann to agree with you.....that is just beyond crazy..

 

I'm not a Democrat or an Obama supporter, and I say Jeff's right.

 

Holy (*)(*)(*)(*) dude... Ok, for the THIRD time...

What you are quoting there, and linking, IS NOT A MOTION BY ANY PARTY. It is the ORDER, and was written by the JUDGE in the case, not the defendants Democratic Party, any other defendant, or the Plaintiffs.

Your link spells it out, calling it the "Order Dismissing Case" right in the text of the link.

Get it? Those are the JUDGE'S words, not the Democrats'.

 

I knew he wasn't eligible when he admitted he wasn't eligible back in 2008.

I guess some people just weren't listening.