Colorado PBS Runs Film Sponsored by 9/11 Families: Experts Say 9/11 Was Demolition

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Munkle, Dec 8, 2012.

  1. Munkle

    Munkle Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2012
    Messages:
    352
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    28
    [​IMG]

    FROM
    http://truth-out.org/news/item/1185...official-story-present-evidence-of-demolition

    Colorado Public Television is airing the documentary "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out" in its airtime schedule, which premiered on August 28th of this year. The documentary produced by 1700 Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth contends that the manner in which the Twin Towers and World Trade Center Seven disappeared on 9/11, as described by the government, is physically impossible. The film is sponsored by, and features on-camera, survivor families of 9/11 victims.

    The film enlists dozens of scientists and credentialed professionals in engineering, architecture, physics, chemistry, metallurgy, demolitions, and other disciplines to go on record with their reasons for believing the official story to be false, who present evidence of controlled demolitions.


    The premiere broadcast was taped by Colorado PBS station KBDI-TV 12 in Denver, which includes an appearance in the CPT 12 studios by special guest Richard Gage, the founder of 1700 Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Colorado CPT 12, as the station is widely known, reaches 80% of the state's population. The documentary has been rebroadcast numerous times due to demand, and is in the fall run-time line-up. It can be watched in full online at the CPT 12 website. It has risen to the "Most Watched" listing of the national PBS website.

    Supporters of the film are urging pubic television viewers to ask their local stations to air the documentary.


    90 minute documentary at Colorado PBS online HERE. (Includes special guest Richard Gage in PBS studios.)

    FROM AMAZON DVD PAGE:
    http://www.amazon.com/11-Explosive-Evidence-Experts-Speak/dp/B009KTIXEC

    Film includes the testimony of 43 experts, including high rise architects, structural engineers, metallurgists, scientists, physicists and explosive experts, who lay out the scientific forensic evidence in the destruction of the Twin Towers and WTC 7 – the third high-rise destroyed on 9/11. Their findings are startling. The 9/11 Commission, FEMA, and NIST (The National Institute of Standards and Technology) reports not only contain serious errors and omissions but are found to be outright fraudulent.

    Why should this matter eleven years later? 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out, produced by the non-profit organization, Architects & Engineers for 9/11Truth challenges the roots of the policies that gave rise to 1) the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars, which have already cost over 1 million lives and $1.3 trillion, and have substantially contributed to our financial crisis and 2) legislation such as the Patriot Act and NDAA [National Defense Authorization Act] that has severely impacted our civil liberties.

    1700 Architects, Engineers and others, including Lynn Margulis, National Medal of Science winner, are introduced, as the petition signers calling for a new investigation, by Richard Gage, AIA, Producer/Director of the film and Founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. They, in turn are represented by the 43 technical experts in the film who highlight the evidence which include the destruction of WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane which exhibited the characteristics of classic controlled demolition with explosives:

    1. Rapid onset of collapse
    2. Sounds of explosions seconds before the building's destruction
    3. Symmetrical "structural failure" – through the path of greatest resistance – at free-fall acceleration
    4. Implosion with complete collapsing - landing in its own footprint
    5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds
    6. Expert corroboration from the top European controlled demolition professional
    7. Foreknowledge of "collapse" by CNN & BBC

    In the aftermath of WTC7's destruction, strong evidence of demolition using incendiary devices was discovered:

    8. FEMA documents rapid oxidation and molten iron on structural steel samples
    9. Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly qualified witnesses
    10. Chemical signature of the incendiary thermite found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples

    WTC7 exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire:
    1. Slow onset of destruction with large visible deformations
    2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of greatest resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fire)
    3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
    4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never collapsed.

    Military Officers Question 9/11

    "What we know and don’t know about 9/11," by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Ronald Reagan.

    Firefighters for 911 Truth

    Pilots for 911 Truth

    Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth

    911Research.net

    "Who Did It? Technology of Autopilot/Remote Flight on 9/11, Motive, Means, Opportunity"

    "911 Case Closed: Aerial Photo Shows Towers Were Exploded Outward, Did Not "Collapse"

    The Easiest Way to Understand 9/11 Was a Demolition: Free-Fall

    911: Shock and Awe Master Deed. Prosecute Giuliani.

    9/11 And the Cover Up: Was Israel Involved in 9/11 Attack? (War by Deception,) film by Ryan Dawson


    [video=youtube;nUDoGuLpirc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=nUDoGuLpirc[/video]

    [video=youtube;jO15CXhsTM4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=jO15CXhsTM4[/video]
     
  2. JIMV

    JIMV Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2009
    Messages:
    25,440
    Likes Received:
    852
    Trophy Points:
    113
  3. Zosiasmom

    Zosiasmom New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2012
    Messages:
    18,517
    Likes Received:
    250
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I've never understood the whining that people have over 911 "truthers". So what? Waaaahhhhh, they don't trust the gubbermint. OH NOES. The world will come to an end if you question its integrity.

    So?

    Like...you don't believe them, you believe the official story...is that not enough? Does your truth not satisfy you personally?
     
  4. Unifier

    Unifier New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    14,479
    Likes Received:
    531
    Trophy Points:
    0
  5. Speeders R Murderers

    Speeders R Murderers Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2010
    Messages:
    4,889
    Likes Received:
    69
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Of course it was demolition. The collapse of bldg 7 proves that. And all those who favor the muslim conspiracy theory have no rebuttal except to accuse the truthers of dishonoring the victims!!!
     
  6. Speeders R Murderers

    Speeders R Murderers Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2010
    Messages:
    4,889
    Likes Received:
    69
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The idea that the govt did 911 is conspiracy fact. Even you know that.
     
  7. Daybreaker

    Daybreaker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2007
    Messages:
    17,158
    Likes Received:
    140
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Is it really wise to discount this idea just because it goes against what the government says?

    This wouldn't even be the weirdest thing the government had ever done.
     
  8. My Fing ID

    My Fing ID Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Messages:
    12,225
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Never understood this point as it implies that major media is unable to report buildings collapsing. I'm really not sure how they could (*)(*)(*)(*) it up so bad that the government thought they needed to send a script out. It also means multiple people in these news agencies including the reporters themselves are part of a massive conspiracy and not one of them has stepped forward, nor the pilots of the planes (including the people who set up the equipment to fly the planes by remote if you believe in that), nor the people who spent weeks or months wiring the building, or the people who were involved with planning. All this in an administration that had constant leaks. Sorry but a bunch of pissed off muslims flying planes into buildings seems much more plausible than a massive government conspiracy.
     
  9. My Fing ID

    My Fing ID Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Messages:
    12,225
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    63
    No, it's fine to question the government, but you have to think out the conclusion. I don't believe the government has the ability to rig up buildings with explosives, fix up jumbo jets to fly into those buildings, bribe news corporations into reading a script, all involving the killing of thousands of innocent US citizens, and not have a single leak.
     
  10. Marshal

    Marshal New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,710
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sure... THEY WOULD want you to think it's DEMOLISHION.

    THEY WOULD want you to think it's thermite and fake airplanes.

    But WE know the truth!

    The time required to place the detonation charges with a building on the verge of collapse would require PRE-placement and people captured on CCTV.

    In order to get the top of the building to collapse first would need detonation charges at the EXACT base of the airplane's impact. NOT FEASIBLE.

    The quantity of thermite necessary to melt the steel would be MASSIVE. Remember, thermite is a sandy metal powder mix and is fluffy and much less dense therefore it occupies a large powder area. Moreover it requires placement ABOVE the metal which is not feasible for I-beam topology.

    They don't want you to know who REALLY did it! Here is a clue: La-la-la-la-la-la-la!

     
  11. The Real American Thinker

    The Real American Thinker New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2012
    Messages:
    9,167
    Likes Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Google "Operation Northwoods" and get back to me.
     
  12. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    People can't possibly believe that BS about box cutters and cave dwellers, can they?
     
  13. Antiauthoritarian

    Antiauthoritarian Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,091
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Interesting how anyone who questions the official story gets accused of a conspiracy theory. The Architects and Engineers aren't making any claims about who did it or why. They are simply pointing out the fact that the buildings were demolished by standard demolition methods and not by airplanes crashing in to them. I'll take their credentials and expert opinions over people who are only capable of ad hominem attacks any day.
     
  14. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Can you quote a structural engineer from that organization?
     
  15. Munkle

    Munkle Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2012
    Messages:
    352
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Here is one of them, Steve Dusterwald.

    [video=youtube;ecdXEsIDzFU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ecdXEsIDzFU#![/video]
     
  16. Antiauthoritarian

    Antiauthoritarian Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,091
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Looks like Munkle beat me to it. Thanks Munkle!
     
  17. My Fing ID

    My Fing ID Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Messages:
    12,225
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    63
    To be fair, usually there's an investigation because the cause is unknown. Planes flying into buildings, and the buildings collapsing, it seems to explain itself. When a plane falls out of the sky, or a building collapses from no apparent cause, then yes there is an investigation because no one knows what happened.
     
  18. Daybreaker

    Daybreaker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2007
    Messages:
    17,158
    Likes Received:
    140
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I think Disney could do it. I think the government could easily do it. I'm not saying that the government did do it, 'cause I've looked and I've found no proof that I found conclusive. If anything, I think it's more likely that it wasn't the government per se, that it was someone making use of the government the way lobbyists make use of senators. Which is, in a way, a scarier thought -- if it were either disgruntled Muslims or our own government or some crazy combination thereof, we would at least have a face to put to the perpetrator. But I don't think we do. I doubt we ever will.

    I think the U.S. was committed to its actions in the middle east well before September 11, 2001. The events of that day helped to facilitate the actions it was already committed to. That could be an unintentional coincidence. Stranger things have happened. But that strikes me as the less likely of the two most broad possibilities, the other being that it's an intentional coincidence.
     
  19. My Fing ID

    My Fing ID Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Messages:
    12,225
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    63
    The most government involvement I could see is willfully ignoring evidence of a strike. As for the build-up that had been happening for some time. Clinton was launching cruise missiles at Afghanistan and terrorists were getting uppity at the time. Another attack was quiet likely, so all they had to do was sit and wait for it to happen.
     
  20. stretch351c

    stretch351c New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2011
    Messages:
    979
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The buildings collapsed the way that did because of the way they were designed. These "experts" seem to ignore the time it would take to ready such buildings for controlled implosion. And the work needed could not be hidden from the public. Every theory about controlled implosion have been debunked time and again. The collapses started at the points of impact. The so-called "explosions" are simply air being expelled as the upper floors collapsed.
     
  21. Unifier

    Unifier New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    14,479
    Likes Received:
    531
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Here's the problem with people like you. You take a perfectly valid concern like Building 7, which even I would like more clarification on as I am not satisfied with the official explanation, and you RUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUN with it to this ridiculous extreme where it must automatically mean it was some kind of giant inside job conspiracy and cover-up by the U.S. government. Rather than asking honest questions to satisfy your curiosity, you race to impliment people for political reasons. And that's stupid. You're being Dale Gribble from King of the Hill right now.


    Bingo. The government is not this efficient.

    Add to this the fact that George W. Bush, who people love to ridicule as incompetant, was president at the time. There is no consistency to the argument that a man is too dumb to string together basic sentences but is ingenius enough to pull off the most horrendous terrorist attack in American history. Make up your minds. Is he stupid or brilliant? He can't be both.
     
  22. Antiauthoritarian

    Antiauthoritarian Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,091
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    38
    So did one group of people hijack the planes and another rigged the buildings for demolition? Or was it the same bunch rigging the building, then going and hijacking the planes? Or is the gov story essentially correct and the planes brought all 3 buildings down?

    Seems to look like demolition did it, so I ask. Who did that? Is there something wrong with that question? Too early to ask until an independent investigation says demolition was involved, maybe? I'm tired of this generally being a taboo topic usually discussed by zealots on both sides. Reasonable people have good reasons to be questioning the gov story on 9/11 and discussing our options for finding out exactly what happened.
     
  23. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Google "speculation", "opinion", "lack of evidence" and get back to me.

    It's one thing to say "they might have done it because of this document from the past".

    It's quite another to say "they did do it" when every truther theory has more holes in it than a slice of Swiss cheese. And the truthers can't even decide on how it was done.

    Their motto seems to be "We don't how it happened but we know for a fact that it didn't happen the way the government says it did."

    Doesn't that seem odd to you?
     
  24. The Real American Thinker

    The Real American Thinker New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2012
    Messages:
    9,167
    Likes Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Where did I say that?

    Sure. But isn't it also odd to think that the government would never do such a thing when it's clear from verifiable fact throughout our history that they are not only capable of such things, but have actually done such things?
     
  25. stretch351c

    stretch351c New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2011
    Messages:
    979
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So a large number of people spent weeks, if not months, secretly rigging the buildings to implode? How were the explosives smuggled in? How did they manage to make the cuts needed to control the implosion so the the buildings fell into their own footprints without the work being noticed? The towers were built with a central core, which held the elevators and stairs with four supporting columns at the corners. the floors were hung between the two. once the first couple of floors gave way at the point of impact, the rest gave way with a cascade effect.
     

Share This Page