Israeli Air Force Attack Syria

You can do what you want.

 

Well, how's this for a start?

Actually, that really isn't the New York Time's biggest problem. The fact that it's a shill for the Democrat Party AND that it makes up stories out of whole cloth has pretty much rendered it useless for getting real news. The National Enquirer is probably more accurate that the NYT nowadays.

 

Can someone tell me why are we back on the Jews again? Isn't this thread about Israel bombing Syria? What does the bombing of Syria have to do with the influence of Jews in the U.S.?

 

Excellent news, although I dont think that will actually help.
Eventually, all those who will want to get sophisticated weapons, or WMD's, will get them.

 

Syria says two people were killed..

The reports of the convoy and the research facility are conflicting reports about the same attack.. I thought there was two attacks, but Syria says it was a research facility, and Western reports say it was a weapons convoy.. Those are very different things so it sounds like somebody is trying to dispense some bull (*)(*)(*)(*).

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/middleeast/la-fg-israel-syria-20130131,0,5112956.story

 

Israel is attempting to administer the coup de grace to Syria. Technically, a state of war still exists between Syria and Israel due to Israel's illegal occupation of the Golan.

 

well the bodies are in a well known rebel held area so they must be 'infidels' who have been executed for listening to radios and not having beards I guess

 

Aye, but will they have arms to use them?

 

Israel strikes Syrian anti-aircraft missile shipment meant for Hezbollah...

Report: Israel notified US of Syria strike
1.31.13, Israeli attack targeted shipment of sophisticated antiaircraft missiles meant for Hezbollah, US papers say

See also:

Hezbollah condemns Israel's raid on Syria
Jan 31,`13 -- Lebanon's militant Hezbollah group has condemned Israel's air raid on Syria, saying it targeted a "scientific research center."

 

The "research" center is around 10 km from central Damascus and the border only 15 km past that. So that would mean a lot of witnesses. The Western reports rely on non Western sources as well as Western ones while the Syrian reports are only backed up by Hezbollah. Of course the reports don't have to be too conflicting depending upon where a convoy or a convoy in the making was, perhaps it was leaving the gates of a large compound, or it stretched back to it?

 

Here is the Time Magazine version: http://world.time.com/2013/01/30/israeli-airstrike-hits-truck-convoy-in-syria/

Don't you like the bit about "spreading destruction inside the Jewish state"?
When did Hezbollah cross the border and slaughter 20 000+ citizens of Israel? Because Israel did exactly that in 1982 to citizens of Hezbollah's country. Who is the real terrorist?.

This is yet another example in a long list of Israeli war actions. It is a well-established pattern. She invaded Egyptian Sinai in 1956 - was THAT defensive? She invaded Syria in 1966 and 1967. Defensive? She invaded Jordan in 1966. Israel initiated a massive first-strike against Egypt in 1967 with Israeli leaders of the time being on record that they knew full well that Nasser did not intend to attack. She invaded Lebanon in 1982 on trumped-up charges and slaughtered 20 000+ citizens. Defensive? Israel broke the cease-fire in November 2008 which led directly to Operation Cast Lead in which she massacred 1400+ Gazans.

And always she claimed "self-defence". Even though this can be easily disproved in all of these cases, the US closes its eyes, opens its mouth, swallows, and then vetoes.

So here we have another case of Israel violating the Rules of War and the UN Charter. And the violation is not subtle. It is HUGELY blatant. But poor 'lil Israel can do no wrong and is therefore allowed to get away with war crimes.

On the other side, what says that a country that has not been violated in a most horrendous way by a super-aggressive neighbour is not allowed to arm itself? I ask you WHEN has Lebanon invaded Israel and on what scale compared to Israel's 1982 invasion and 20 000+ slaughter? When has Hezbollah illegally (or otherwise) occupied Israeli territory for 18 years?

Once we have answered that, I then ask you who is the most in need of weapons for defence?

Finally I ask you which rule of war prevents a country from acquiring weapons? Was the US allowed to invade East Germany when she acquired war material? Russia? Is the US allowed to attack North Korea? I do not ask if she MIGHT not. I ask a question of compliance with International Law and the various protocols that try to prevent Armageddon.

 

Hizbulla is not a country.
Israel does not prevent egypt/syria/jordan etc. from getting weapons.

 

That sounds quite possible. I'd like to know more about this airstrike(s).

 

Its very simple, if you describe yourself as an enemy to someone else and engage him from time to time than you should expect he will not only want to strike you back but eliminate the threat that you posses over him, and no, being weaker than him will not protect you....


So, an active enemy during war time that wants to gain better weapons - is a full legit target and Israel will ALWAYS target terrorists in this area, that's why we are supported by the west (You'd call it Zionist global conspircy I trust).

 

You seem to be under the impressioon that Hezbollah is a country or at least the legitimate regime of a country. Its not, its a terrorist outfit! Exactly which rule of war are you suggesting has been broken?

 

Mossad are notoriously incompetent-innocent people murdered, their agents arrested and prosecuted. But I would agree; if WMD are involved in this strike then good riddance to them.

 

"...citizen's of Hezbollah's country..." That country being Lebanon.

 

So the hezbulla are the ruling party in lebanon?
They are the army of lebanon?
There is no other ruling part?
No lebanese army?

 

Syria would not have any anti-aircraft materials to spare at this time. I suggest that that aspect of story is the usual, manufactured, neoZionist casus belli The attack is opportunist . It is intended to isolate Syria from its allies.

 

For example...

 

It's not 'Western reports'. There are no 'Western reports'. There are only two things. The truth. And the lies that Jews filter to you, via their media and shill politicians.

 

Hizbi's?

- - - Updated - - -

Imagine they were Zionists

 

It's obvious that Zionist Jews, through their many tentacles, engineered the unrest on the ground. People better placed and qualified than anyone here, having been saying this from almost the get go. They have used this type of methodology before, creating fax 'revolutions' and so on, going all the way back to before when Israel was even formed. It is one of their methods, the other being to use sanctions to try to bully a given nation. Again, they have been doing this long before Israel came to pass. Happy to offer examples of both, but no use putting them up unless anyone is seriously interested. That said, you can likely think of a few examples, off the top of your head.

Syria have been on their twisted radar for ages. Long before all of this trouble started, for years Syria have been in the sights of their eyes of evil. They have spent the last year trying to break it's spine, from the inside, with their backed and supported terrorist murders. Just as the same kinds of people did in the Russian Revolution, which saw concentration camps constructed, under the orders of Jews, in which countless people died. A conservative estimate would be that they butchered their way through some 60million Russians, mostly Christians.

Having spent the past year or so, overseeing their fake civil war in Libya, this latest move by them, was always inevitable.

What it comes down to is this, they are past masters at three things. Murder, lying, and stealing. That is what it comes down to, and that is what it has always been about, long before Israel came into being.

 

As I have said to you, more times than I really should need to, I do not regard anyone's death as 'excellent news', least of all non combatant troops. That includes Jews. Your lot, on the other hand, you rejoice in the death of whoever, whenever, this is regarded by you as 'excellent news', I mean, what else can it possibly be for you lot, you have always seen the murder of those not part of your cult as something to like.

Disgusting.

 

We rejoice the target was eliminated, 2 dead is a very low number to save the lives those weapons would make if they reached the destination,

In general, when offered a job in the middle east, non combatants need to check its not for a certain terror group, trafficing arms, making bombs, Uranium etc', just ask your employer he must declare it...

....By international law....