Let me drop this right in your laps.. :-)

Note you do not deny the information, but, ha ha ha ..cite the pathetic GLOBAL ANTI SEMITISM ACT.



- - - Updated - - -

Jews are an atheist cult that nicked a biblical name, and who routinely rape kids, in the Brookyln NYC Hassidic community.

So spare me your crap about 'Mohammed'.

 

A million Muslims marching on the White House on a 9/11 anniversary. What could possibly go wrong?

 

I'll be the first to admit Hassidic Jews are strange as hell, but if they're raping kids, that ought to be easy enough to prove. But, as I previously noted, I consider pretty much all religion to be a cancer. We need to unshackle ourselves from made made dogma so that we can find our way back to real spirituality and grow as a species. Fortunately, I think we're headed in the right direction.

 

In my opinion, we should be busier promoting the general welfare of our republic.

 

Let us now look a bit closer, and thanks for citing it, Jonsa old boy, of the GLOBAL ANTI SEMITISM ACT(ooh, big and scary)..

ZIONISM UNMASKED: 'Anti-Semitic' - the Label that Stops Criticism
(Salem-News.com ) -- Dr. Paul Balles

...In 2004, the US Congress passed the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act. The Act defines a person as being anti-Semitic for holding any of a number of beliefs. My comments follow each of the 14 items supposedly revealing anti-Semitism.

1. Any assertion, “that the Jewish community controls government, the media, international business and the financial world.”

According to this, it doesn’t matter whether the assertion is true or not. Truth is not an issue. Simply making such a statement violates the Act. In itself, that fact provides strong evidence of control of the US government.

2. The expression of “Strong anti-Israel sentiment.”

Any criticism of Israel can thus be considered anti-Semitic. Israel can mangle Gaza and get away with it.

3. Expressing “Virulent criticism” of Israel’s leaders, past or present.

Menachem Begin may have led the Irgun in the slaughter and dispossession of thousands of Palestinians, but it’s anti-Semitic to say so.

4. Any criticism of the Jewish religion or its religious leaders with its emphasis on the Talmud and Kabbala.

It’s perfectly acceptable, as free speech, to vilify Islam, but any criticism of Judaism violates the Act.

5. Any criticism of the United States Government and Congress for being under the undue influence by the Jewish-Zionist community, which would include Jewish organizations such as AIPAC.

Truth matters not to the ridiculous legislators who passed this ludicrous act.

6. Any criticism of the Jewish-Zionist community for promoting globalism or what some call the “New World Order.”

When you can’t criticise a propaganda machine for its promotions, both free speech and democracy are dead.

7. Placing any blame on Jewish leaders and their followers for inciting the Roman crucifixion of Christ.

In order to accommodate the anti-Semitism label, simply rewrite history.

8. Citing any facts that could in any way diminish the “six million” figure of Jewish holocaust victims.

I violate the act simply by citing the fact that five million non-Jews died at the hands of the Nazis. This goes beyond stifling free speech.

9. Claiming that Israel is a racist state.

That’s not a claim. It’s a fact. Israel is full of racist laws. It insists on preserving its racist character and its right to impose apartheid in the West Bank and Gaza.

10. Making any claim that there is a “Zionist Conspiracy.”

A rational provision for such a claim would insist on evidence as proof of its validity. To disallow making such a claim is existentially (Israelis love that word) dictatorial.

11. Offering proof that Jews and their leaders created Communism and the Bolshevik revolution in Russia.

It just became illegal to offer proof. Minds are made up. Don’t confuse them with the facts.

12. Making derogatory statements about Jewish persons.

Why limit it to Jewish persons?

13. Asserting that spiritually disobedient Jews do not have the Biblical right to re-occupy Palestine.

Why limit it to the spiritually disobedient?

14. Making any allegations of Mossad involvement in the 9/11 attack.

I just did in a column published a week ago.

The Act passed by the US Congress makes me anti-Semitic. It’s an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment to the Constitution. I’m a critic of Israel when they commit wrongs and a critic of America when it does wrong. Despite Congress, that’s not anti-Semitic...MORE...LINKhttp://www.salem-news.com/articles/february112010/antisemitism_pb.php

 

Not as easy as you may think, but let's have a bash.

How about this and this...http://www.politicalforum.com/lates...tains-hidden-child-abuse-showing-tonight.html

And this..http://www.politicalforum.com/political-opinions-beliefs/278189-sexual-abuse-why-silence.html

You asked. I have delivered.

 

Don't tell me, get law enforcement involved.

 

You are implying that they will be attacked, right? Well, that is down to the attackers, not down to those that are allowed to petition, assemble, and be protected by their Constitutional rights. I am going to assume you do not wish to start singling out blocs of people, and deny them those, right? I hope not. They are not going there to start violence or attack anyone. They are not going there to celebrate what happened. I actually think they are right to speak out, esp after some of what I cited in the OP. I take it you read those things, yes? Do you deny those things? Would you like that to be you, or your wife, or your daughter? Would you petition, if that had been the case, against you? Therefore, if they are attacked, that will simply show that America, even after 12 yrs, does not understand a thing, nor do they even grasp their own consitution.

 

Brooklyn is outwith my remit.

I do not know any community of people, anywhere, ever, that would arrogantly go out of it's way to do a public fundraiser for a 'Rabbi', that was convicted of 59 counts of raping kids.

Do you?

[video=youtube;krRPXpRT5po]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krRPXpRT5po&feature=player_detailpage[/video]

- - - Updated - - -

Brooklyn is outwith my remit.

I do not know any community of people, anywhere, ever, that would arrogantly go out of it's way to do a public fundraiser for a 'Rabbi', that was convicted of 59 counts of raping kids.

Do you?

[video=youtube;krRPXpRT5po]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krRPXpRT5po&feature=player_detailpage[/video]

 

I am not defending the Hassidic community. The only thing I really know about them is that they dress funny and have some really backwards ass ideas. Then again, except for the dressing funny part, so does just about every other religion on the planet.

 

...and that they are engaged in the systematic rape, abuse, and attempts to silence, by way of community pressure.

And the Rabbi's. They are at the heart of it all.

Put it this way. If I lived near there with kids, I would want to ensure kids and parents be made aware of this.

Anything else would be irresponsible, imo.

 

Yeah, I'm not thinking that attacking a million-man mob is a wise thing. No, that's not my concern at all.

The GOOD news for this bunch is that The People's Press has been properly subdued and is docile enough so that no tough questions will be found within a hundred miles of this march unless some of these Muslims are Republicans or Known Conservatives. Then all bets are off. Also, they're headed towards Obamas general direction so there's zero chance of a confrontation there. Our Glorious Messiah will probably head out and bow down to them, as usual.



The BAD news is that usually whenever you get a collection of this type, it's usually the die-hard true-believer types that come out. You rarely see a mob of moderates marching and protesting somewhere. I'm thinking there's going to be a sufficient amount of nuts in the crowd saying and/or doing stuff so off the wall that it'll end up hurting their own cause. And actually, I do see a chance of some of them behaving like idiots and celebrating 9/11. That, the press may NOT accept so easily.

They most certainly have the right to do this but I also see a bigger chance of them shooting themselves in the foot than actually doing themselves any good with this event.

 

Please tell me you are having a laugh. In what possible way do you think HE has done anything but be Israel's Uncle Tom?

He is a disgrace to Americans, a disgrace to honesty, and a disgrace to black people.

And he has done NOTHING for Muslims, save for look the other way, or murder them.

 

Your sarcasm meter must be busted today. Of COURSE I'm laughing at Obama. And yeah, he would absolutely go out and bow down to this march as well. Maybe you can't see the picture (off at work perhaps?) but one of them is of Obama bowing to the Saudis. Obama's spine makes wet linguini look like adamantium.

 

Of course you are. No one had any doubt.

 

When do you expect Afghanistan or Iraq to start to turn a profit?

 

Good question, you were the one who asked.

 

Around the same time the US ditches it's cabal of privately owned Jewish bankers (aka Fed Reserve), and issues their own legal tender, rather than have Jews control the money of non Jews.

- - - Updated - - -

So what if they were Muslims.

Those planning to come out are not supporting the action, are they?

You are not going to go into a Pamela Gellar style, MOSQUE ON GROUND ZERO SEETHE over this, are you?

 

According to your article they are defending those who carried out the action. I'm ok with them marching. Will help to show the true nature of your typical American Muslim.

 

Some people might be wondering why they didn't march back then, in indignation at this act being done in the name of their religion, or after the Bali bombing, Madrid or Mumbai etc.

 

They aren't though.

- - - Updated - - -

Another that did not read carefully enough.

 

We wouldn't be there in the first place if the wealthiest had to pay wartime tax rates for it.

 

Yoohoo. that wasn't information you posted. that was slanderous opinion crafted by someone who is an obvious jew hater as proven by the fact that the post displayed at least 4 of definitions of the UN's - Here's how to spot a jew hater list. It is further corroborated by the fact that many of the salacious accusations are right out of the intellectually pathetic, white nationalist playbook.

 

I have proven on at least three different occasions that the jew's own the Federal reserve and the Bank of England is nothing more than a jew hating myth. Despite having the knowledge that this accusation has been proven totally and completely false, you persist in spreading it.

I rejoice in the knowledge that such monetary policy giants such as yourself can make it seem all so.........simple.

 

Religion has no place in schools the Jews are not responsible for the existence of porn (love porn ) this is madness

- - - Updated - - -

What Muslims want, most of all? To be left alone. To be left in peace. That is what Muslims want, most of all, and it is a basic right.


of course form some Muslims and for many non-Muslims to be left alone and left in peace means to be left to violate hum rights and to oppress people as they see fit