No, I didn't. Why ask anyone to back you up? Provide your own evidence if you claim that I did. Oh ...wait ... you're incapable of doing that, since you aren't telling the truth. Another impotent failure, Fraud. I see, so you weren't banned. You're caught in another falsehood. I showed evidence of your directly calling people 'shills'. I showed evidence of you claiming Hurricane Sandy was 'steered'. Where's your evidence?
oh come on you seen it didnt you? and they gave you the commission and nist reports didnt you read them? what more could you want?
You're welcome. Now get back to promoting number two. I think koko just posted some for everyone to sniff.
No doubt it was exploited, that exploitation continues to this day. That's still a long way from allowing it to happen.
It certainly is a long way from allowing it to happen... but did you know that the terrorists implicated in the attack were reported by the airport in Venice, Florida, as being serious terrorist threats? The aspiring killers apparently - among other things - weren't interested in learning to land. Same thing with this Boston Marathon business (people all over the world knew they were nuts, including the FBI). Either this is the most frightening ineptocracy in the world, or somebody is letting things happen. Both options are plausible. Which I suppose is why I'm on this thread, waiting to see how much validity the Truther argument has.
Leaving the Boston claim out (for focus and clarity) can you cite a source for the Venice claim. I'm looking it up on my end, also.
http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&complete_911_timeline_key_events=complete_911_timeline_key_warnings This is a better link - it has sources for everything it claims. While I can't find the Venice reports, I did find that the Arizona-trained terrorists were reported multiple times by various FBI agents. Also, there is such a wealth of relatively reliable information on here that it may sway the opinions for some posters on this board.
Let's stick with one claim at a time, so as to not derail, okay? I haven't been able to find anything supporting the Venice claim, either. The Arizona-trained students you reference were Lebanese, and none of them participated in the 9/11 attacks. Your link states that one or two of them 'may have known' Hani Hanjour' and that the reports were not given any special status among the FBI. Indeed, the one you reference was not issued until July 27th and was marked 'routine'. While this seems inept, it does not logically lead to 'let it happen'. From your link:
I was sticking with one claim at a time, pal. And when I realized I could not find my source for that claim, I moved on and said to "assume I was mistaken unless I could find a reputable source." Unfortunately, I think I accidentally deleted that while editing my post for the new link. Even on the edited version though, I admitted I could not find a source for the Venice incident, and moved on from there. 1 minus 1 plus 1 equals 1, friend. I AM sticking with one claim at a time. Anyway, if you really want to decide for yourself, the information on that link seems pretty reliable. The rest is up to you.
Okay - so no evidence for the Venice claim, agreed. Your speculation on 'Arizona trained terrorists' is unfounded as well. Lebanese pilot trainees that 'may have known' Hani Hanjour does not equal 'reports of Arizona trained terrorists'. So far you haven't provided any valid evidence for your claim that the administration allowed the attacks to happen. Do you or do you not have an argument?
I love when people buy all the conspiracy theories and then attack people for supporting a theory based on evidence. HAARP can't make weather, no one can steer hurricanes and there would be no reason to slam one into the east coast. http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4122<
Yup...me too. That's about as far as it can go in a shill environment boss. Thanks for the half baked agreement.
I did say Hurricane Sandy was steered. because clearly, it was. I don't recall say Romney steered it. You did though, and that would be a lie. Once again, you claimed you were "in between flights" during an exchange. I guess you don't recall that. (yeah right).
I will believe that when one of you lot come up with an explanation, wehcih can be tested, for how it works.
I showed evidence for my claims. Now you show evidence of yours. No? We both know you can't, because it never happened. Put up or shut up, Fraud.
(*)(*)(*)(*)in aye! I would give my left nut to play with that grid for a couple weeks! you want a demonstration get me a pass.
I think they would frown on anyone lacking a basic education having their hands on the equipment. Just tell us what energy is applied and how. And if you dare say "Hutchison Effect," I will have to consider you mentally impaired, because the only two people actively selling that stupidity are themselves mentally impaired.