White Man Visits A Black Republic

You see a lot of commentary on Negroes on here by people who have had very little experience with Negroes other than in a regulated and formal setting like at work, school or in the military.

These same sorts get most of their ideas about Negroes from watching T.V. or Hollywood movies where negroes are constantly placed into roles they seldom occupy in real life using words written for them by some Caucasian screen writer..... and thus the liberals get a very phony picture of what negroes are really like---often believing and claiming they are just like white people...only with a dark tan...how ridiculous.

To really know them and understand them they must be viewed in their natural setting, using their own vocabulary and exhibiting their true natures.

To do this one needs to visit a ghetto area in some big city or take a safer trek down south where so many negroes live.

Some might find this interesting>>>>>

http://www.amren.com/features/2013/05/white-man-visits-the-black-republic






http://www.amren.com/features/2013/05/white-man-visits-the-black-republic

 

Don't expect a sincere discussion of this. I however will offer an obvious assessment.

A people can inherit a land of fertile and rich capability, but unless they also possess the intelligence and moral compass to produce more than violence and cardboard shacks, they will never amount to anything other than permanent welfare parasites from the western world of White Guilt.

I'd love to hear one progressive deny this with anything that resembles real world examples.

 

(Saw two black guys in the park smoking crack)

(Purports to have greater experience with "negroes" than LIEberals)

 

What a charming OP, including a link to a white supremacist website.

Color me unsurprised that this is here.

 

Why not join the discussion in some meaningful way? The African's took over Haiti, a thriving economic powerhouse, and turned it into an island toilet. Perhaps you can offer some reason for why that is always the case.

 

Another one with nothing of substance to offer, because the truth is self-evident and is not diluted by hurt feelings.

 

Perhaps you can explain why you think Haiti was a thriving economic powerhouse. I can't find any source for your assertion. But it would be consistent with the fact that labor was fairly cheap down there.

 

Try reading the article, or some history on the country.

Actually, never mind. Go find some other stuff to talk about where you don't have to reach beyond your comfort zone.

 

Oh Look, another thread for cockroaches to scurry about in.

 

Lol...What is there to discuss here?
A couple of right-wing clowns playing the race card, yet again.
The thread will most likely be closed down soon as the usual gang gather to wallow in a diarrhea of racist guttersniping.

 

Oh. You mean this part?

That is why it was an economic powerhouse. Labor was free.

 

That was pretty arrogant of those 30,000 whites, with the technology of the time, thinking that they could hold down 500,000 people with shackles, whips and single shot muskets! LOL, the probably thought they where too stupid to revolt.

 

Haiti, Zimbabwe, Zaire, Nigeria, etc the list goes on and on but the story is (within a narrow range of variation) much the same.

 

South Africa, also (in progress). I'm sure it will be just as successful of a country once blacks finally take over the entire country and drive the whites out.

 

Thanks for your usual input.

I did not expect you to have anything to say on the subject. I understand, it hurts to face the truth when it's not pleasant. Take a trip to Haiti, enjoy the fruits of African rule.

 

Liberals and conservatives alike play the race card.

If you consider yourself a thinking individual, then I suggest you don't buy in and bite at threads like this. It only perpetuates an erroneous belief that radical thought encompasses rational ideology.

Similarly, I try not to attach some of the beliefs held on here by the mentally handicapped to mainstream political ideologies (e.g. Racist/bigoted comments or ridiculous conspiracy theories held by individuals claiming to represent either side of the political spectrum).

To think both parties don't have racist or bigoted individuals is denying reality. To think either party is primarily occupied by the racist and bigoted is an exercise of failed reasoning.

 

Are you by chance a neo-nazi or a sympathizer of their cause?

 

Haiti was never a sustainable ecconomy. One person could never have made enough by subsistance farming to feed himself, and they had no industrial base.

The countries from which the slaves were abducted had, at the time, civilizations which were, for the most part, more developed and efficient than is Haiti today.

Mali and Ghana were actually quite advanced empires, but were undone by the introuction of firearms into rival nations.

The reason that so much wealth could be extracted from Haiti, pre-revolution, was that the land was used largely to produce such cash crops as the Europeans wanted to export. The few garden plots that the slaves worked barely supported them. Only the foreign planters made money because they tooka disproportionate share of the product of the labor of several hundred other persons for themselves and did nothing for the slaves.

After killing off the white scum, the blacks at least owned their own bodies and the fruit of their labor.

That is an improvement. No question about it.

Now, if foreigners wanted to, they could build some light industrial plant there and probably get some small farms up and running and maybe get the ecconomy growing, PROVIDED THAT they paid a living wage to the workers and such independent farmers who supplied them with their surplus crops.

That's the problem, though. When our investors go abroad, they are not doing so with the intention of paying people what they are worth, any more than they do here.

 

I guess that depends on what you mean by "successful." If you mean a political apparatus solely structured to brutally oppress 75% of the population based on race, then I guess it was successful. If you mean a brutally oppressive regime that treated humans like chattel and funneled the majority of the nation's assets into the hands of a few, then I guess it was successful.

By all other measures, apartheid South Africa was a failure of a country.

You might be interested to know that since 1990 (official end of apartheid), the SA GDP has almost tripled.

 

At least the blacks in Hait have their own country. More than can be said about the blacks in the southern USA states.

 

Some basically have their own cities though. Detroit, Memphis, New Orleans. Shinning examples on par with Haiti.

 

Ah yes, "conflict theory" sociology, originated by Karl Marx, makes an appearance. It's important to sell the image of "oppressors" and their "victims" in order to discount the incredible beacon of civilization that emerged from perhaps the most primitive continent in existence. To this day South Africa is the most economically prosperous country in all of Africa, yet its days are numbered as whites are being pushed out by black aggression.

Yep, big business and capitalism (things the left hates) are doing well in sub-Saharan Africa since around 2001. So what?

 

And what a great country and model for "black countries" everywhere.

 

No, they do not. They are just living there, trying to find work in a shrinking ecconomy. They don't own any of the resources.

Kind of the same problem as in some parts of Africa or pre-indedependance Ireland where the foreign planters and miners came in and grabbed all the good stuff for themselves.

 

That picture would be a lot more effective if it had not included the coffins and earthquake debris.