Commission report ommitted and ignored, but defended vigorously by shills

Your 'handle' also has a capital F. To call you fraud (with a small f) would be an insult. Abbreviating your name (with a capital F, as you registered it) is not.

 

You would prefer I address you as "Boy", then? If I'm your Boss, you're my boy.

 

Nowher in my screen name is there 'lonely' or 'boss' in Hannibal's,but there IS a capatalized 'fraud' in YOUR name,thus the abbreviation,so man up,quit whining and get back on topic.

 

So as long as I can come up with a "form" of the word used as a handle, that's okay? That what you're saying?

 

I already stated: you are welcome to abbreviate my name any way you'd like. I don't care.

 

Not even.....quit whining and get back on topic

 

Just embrace the inevitable and change your moniker to Herp-a-Derp already.

 

"Herp-a-Derp" is an insult and hopefully the mods will show the same intolerance of this as they do with me.

- - - Updated - - -

Abbreviating my handle I consider an insult. Please use my correct name, just as you have asked me to do with yours.

 

Hand to glove.

 

Hand to crotch.

 

*yawn*

 

You'll grow hair on your palms doing that Fraud.

 

Personal experience I take it?

 

Rubber/glue I take it? I can always count on you to bring a spork to a knife fight.

 

It's no fight NA. It's more like a pimple on my azz.

 

You pop your ass pimples with a spork? Find the right tool for the right job Fraud.

 

Thanks for the suggestion, NA.

 

You mean the 9/11 commission narrative? That went on trial? When?

 

Zacarias Moussaoui

Dunno about the other ones.

 

That wasn't a trial of the 9/11 Commission Report. It was the trial of Zacarious Moussaiui. The report wasn't even entered as evidence in that trial.

Plus, the court didn't make any determinations at all in that trial. ZM simply plead guilty to the charges and the only thing they had to decide was how long to sentence him.

 

The jury decided on how to sentence him based on the evidence in the 9-11 Commission Report.

if the evidence was crap, he would have been sentinced to the minimum possible.

 

He said the official narrative was on trail, not the commission report.

The amount of evidence which came out during the trial of ZM adds further to the pile of evidence supporting the official narrative.

 

I was asking about the 9/11 commission report... The thread is about the 9/11 commission report. That's why when you answered my question, I was asking if it's the 9/11 commission report he was talking about when he said official story. He said it in response to discussion of this report, implying that he considered the 9/11 commission report to be the official story as written, but, I was asking to clarify to make sure, because there are actually people who think the 9/11 commission report held up in court when it never did nor has it ever even been attempted to be entered as evidence.

Incedentally, the ZM trial didn't make a determination because he plead guilty.

What exactly is the "official narrative"? Where is it written? (if not the 9/11 commission report)