They could hang a sign that says "No shirt, No shoes, and homosexuals, no service". They have the right to refuse service to any one they wish. If their conscience and convictions tell them homosexuality is repulseive (as it most surely is) then they do not have to serve them or avail their business or property to their perverse proceedings. See how simple that is?
You mean to be non discriminatory on the basis of certain, select classifications of people. They could post a sign that "long haired freaky people, need not apply" for rental of our hall, and they would be perfectly legal to do so.
So true. But Islam hates us because we treat them bad you know. Progressive leftists are no more intelligent than what your dog leaves behind in the yard.
They are all men who are attracted to the same sex. Just as you presume this couple is discriminating against two people of the same sex getting married, because they are homosexual, it could easily be argued that they are excluding NAMBLA because they are homosexuals.
You are right. If the shop owners had been Buddhists no a peep would be heard. Christians are the targets of opportunity. These leftists do not respect the rights of others, as laog as they can falsely proclaim themselves victims at the expense of their betters they have no conscience or shame.
No, they cannot I am not insulting. I am giving a logic argument. If homosexuality is not accepted and even supposes a danger for your life in many places, no one would become homosexual. I am going to keep being heterosexual to prevent being discriminated, hated and even put in danger my own life, just for sex preferences. It's so stupid to suggest that people want freely to live that kind of life. Homosexuality is not a choice. - - - Updated - - - They are bisexual. They didn't choose to bisexual. And no they didn't choose to be homosexual. They chose an homosexual relationship, but they are bisexual, and in any moment can feel attracted to a person of other sex and have a heterosexual relationship. The same with the other case that you mention. They are bisexuals in an heterosexual relationship.
Newsflash: People are allowed to oppose homosexuality, depite the ongoing pretenses of the Left,and the Constitution-IGNORING Gay Guevara judges. There is no "civil right" of sexual preference. Billions of people believe HOMOSEXUALS are "evil". When are you going to express your "rage" at MUSLIMS< who are still EXECUTING HOMOSEXUALS?
Are folks suppose to wear signs of the sex they prefer so one knows whether they can be served or not? Or just pick and chose based on the way someone looks?
I didn't say that. You are jumping to a conclusion, which is no better than leaping to the conclusion that people are born gay. There is no conclusive proof that people aren't born gay, either. Perhaps you could explain why you think it matters whether or not people are born gay.
Sure, they have that right. And those of us who are more enlightened have the right to call them out for the scumbag (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)s that they are. See, rights go both ways. 20 years ago, perhaps. But the times have changed, and continue to do so. I would alert you to expect SCOTUS to declare SSM a civil right in all 50 states within the decade. Yes. Billions of brainwashed idiots, who live their lives based on advice from people who thought bacterial infections were punishment from gawd. I stand opposed to anyone who is intolerant. But I'm not going to single handedly invade Iran, as much as the prospect does sound appealing.
I am not bisexual. I made no such choice. And silly logic to conclude that if heterosexuals are born heterosexual, that homosexuals must also be born homosexual. Most people are born with an inherent, biological drive that compells an overwhelming attraction to the opposite sex. Likely some evolutionary adaptation that leads to the perpetuation of the species. Some people are born without this evolutionary adaptation, just like some people are born without arms, which allows an attraction to the opposite sex to develope.
Why would they stop doing business ? That makes no sense. Because suddenly one gay couple wants to rent a hall that has been successfully rented for years, they should just close down ? That's what the gays want.... and will never get no matter how loud they are. Neither is body odor.... so you're saying they should be allowed to refuse service to someone because they smell. Brilliant. Do your own research. I have no interest in knowing more than the little I already do. They are a group of homosexuals who should be removed from existence. Unless they decide to call themselves "transgendered" which would gain them special rights. The right to free speech allows these people to say and do as they wish, as long as it doesn't harm anyone. Which it hasn't. If some new law says otherwise, I am sure they will welcome the slap on the hand.... and the boycott from gays worldwide. ow @ that.
They absolutely can, and people have. No, you were insulting. You just didn't realize it. Yeah, you're right. They would never want to live that way, let alone flaunt it publicly. What was I thinking... - - - Updated - - - And another.... So people who oppose homosexuality are "evil". Great. zzz...
People who oppse homosexuality are homophobes, evil if you want, yes. And obviously they want to live freely. But they never chose to be homosexual. Cannot you understand the difference? If I can choose between a kind of life where I am going to be with permanent danger or a life without any danger I am going to choose the one without dangers. But if I cannot choose, I am going to fight to be able to live my life without dangers. Do you get the difference? And the situation of homosexuals. They didn't choose to be homosexuals. No one has been left to be homosexual, zero. No one has become homosexual. I've not being insulting homosexuals, by the way. My point was valid, and was meaning no one chooses a life with such quantity of troubles as homosexuals.
Yes it does, the law gives them the option of following the law or being in violation if they choose to ignore it. They could challenge the law, but until then the choice is simple. Or they could follow the law. No the gays as you called homosexual people want to not be discriminated against....I can't understand why more people don't see that. Well yes they can do that.... Indeed, Hmmmmm so you don't know much about the group and yet reference them. Sounds like you could get in trouble doing that since you aren't sure who they are. Please define said rights you speak of. Except that is not what is happening here. They are violating an anti-discrimination law and thus there is legal harm. ow @ that.
what happened to just walking away and finding another business that will most definitely suit your needs? oh wait thats too easy, must start outrage to get your name in the paper.
Which is what makes "protected groups" so laughable. What happened to EQUAL protection? NO ONE should get SPECIAL protection. Some people's kids............
Hmmm, no. People are intolerant of intolerant xtians. There is no law against being intolerant, there are laws against breaking the law. - - - Updated - - - So that would be your answer to a black or jew who was refused service due to their ethnicity?
