Marginal utility of money

You know what little person? I would rather make an occasional mistake in writing than to be so clueless about a subject as you are. You still don't know anything about the subject of marginal utility, and I really could care less if you want to call a mistake a fib. It still puts me in a better position on the subject.

 

OK, I will just as one of the others. Your calling dnsmith dishonest for what was obviously a mispeak, which I base on the numerous times he told you that the marginal utility of the rich man did not justify higher taxes, is obviously petty. I think he is correct in saying his mispeak is not nearly so important as your inability to address the subject of marginal utility intelligently.

 

Thanks. I am sure I will go down in the history of this forum as being careless about reading through too quickly what was posted to me and answering in haste. I will not be the one who in the history of this forum as the one ignorant of the subject. No excuse though, It is my own fault for not being careful about answering many questions repeated so often that I presumed they were the same as other questions.

 

One of the "others" what?

Who asked you? Wow, you're coming in to say that Dnsmith is correct and insult folks arguing against him? What a shocker.

You know what's funny? Your "on-line" indicator is never on at the same time as Dnsmith's. Even though you wrote this post minutes ago. It's like you two are never on line at the same time, even when you write posts at about the same time.

Kind of like that Clark Kent/Superman thing.

BTW, you never responded to my posts to you.

 

Gee, I wonder what happened to GPerrault?

 

You asked others.

You have never made a post to me which had sufficient intelligence in them to which I should respond.

Btw, every time or almost every time I come on the forum dnsmith is on too. That shoots your, "Your "on-line" indicator is never on at the same time as Dnsmith's," to shreds.

 

You said others would judge. He said he was one of the others.

Oh yeah, and I am sure Goober will come on and defend your ignorance, so why can't someone defend me?.

Observe the time stamps on the posts. WE BOTH POSTED AT EXACTLY AT THE SAME TIME. Your implication that I am posting with more than one screen name has been noted..

 

I didn't ask "others" anything.

Well, isn't that amazing. Your "on-line" indicator has been off this entire time since my last post, and even though you were off line the whole time, somehow you were able to know I wrote a post, write a response, and then post it, just as your on-line indicator went back on.

It kind of makes me wonder how you were able to know I wrote a post, and read it, when you were off line. ESP?

- - - Updated - - -

Answering for "GPerrault" again? Who asked you?

 

He was right here, what are you talking about? Are you getting paranoid Iriemon? That would be a terrible affliction, being ignorant and paranoid at the same time would be terrible.

 

Since this is a public forum I can respond to anyone to which I wish to respond. Especially when you are questioning my integrity..

 

LOL! Look ironman my green light is on. Watch it go off.

 

Now it is on again. So what? Its really simple. I set my computer to erase all cookies when I leave a site. like now.

 

Perrault, now you are just playing with his mind. That is his job, to take his brain out and play with it.

 

You are right.

Sorry ironman, I apologize for making fun of you. OOps, off goes my green light again.

 

He was "right here" eh? Amazing how you could know what he was doing. Especially since his "on-line" indicator was off from the entire time from when I wrote post #754 until just a second before he posted his response in #756.

Since you seem to have this amazing ability to know exactly what GPerrault is doing and thinking at any given moment, maybe you can explain how it was he was able to know I wrote a post in response to his, and read it, when he he was off-line the whole time?

 

I have no idea what he is doing or thinking, but I can read, even if I do read fast and make mistakes occasionally. Obviously he was not off line all the time or he could not have posted. Yep Iriemon you are getting paranoid.

 

That's OK. Anyone who has followed DNSmith's posts knows that his "friends" like you and "Fran" and "Cal" and "John" frequently show up in threads he's participating in to insult and gang bang people who are arguing against Dnsmith. We've seen it over and over. I expected nothing different. In fact, I'm surprised it took you so long to show up.

By the way, it is "Iriemon" not Ironman. Intentionally bastardizing people's handles are against the rules. Thanks.

 

Golly, what do we have here? A clusterf--k with iriemon in the middle? ROTFLMAO.

 

Whoa, now where did you come from? Oh, and I see your green light is on. Be careful now he is implying we are all one person with 3 screen names.

 

Oh no. He was off-line the entire time. I was watching it.

But you are certainly correct. Since he was off line all the time, he could not possibly have known I had written a response and read it. Unless "he" knew about it for some other reason, right?

 

There is no accounting for peoples paranoia or their ignorance. But I have work to do, see you later.

 

You are wrong, as usual. He WAS on line the whole time and you just made a mistake. Oh gosh, oh darn, you made a mistake, you aren't perfect after all.

 

Sorry about that, it was a mistake. It certainly was not intentional. But gee, I can't be posting, I am not on line right now. This is a dream, is a dream, a dream, dream..............

 

Wow. Isn't it amazing how you could claim to know exactly what it is he is doing. Almost as if he was sitting there with you.

 

Nope! Just like you, I have to wait until it hits the screen to know. But go ahead, keep implying we are the same person using multiple screen names.