Why are white people pro-diversity?

Disagree all you like, it was written.

 

so idiotic.

the word is caucus-ian.

like norweig-ian

and belg-ian.

and hungar-ian

and serb-ian

and yugoslav-ian

and slovok-ian

and russ-ian

and beloruss-ian

 

So whites dont come from asia then..where did they come from, the moon?

 

Maybe because we all started out as poor black children?

 

originally?

looks like Africa.

 

The OP looks like a racial supremacist to me.

It will never be a good thing to put up borders to your fellow man. The human race at some point will have to unite under a single banner to survive.

We are all human beings not white/black/yellow, we are humans, we should find a way to agree with each other and unite under that fact not the color of our skin.

 

And again, why should anyone have any say in another individuals freedom of movement? Who are you or anyone to say where I should or should not live based on skin tone?

 

so they came across from gibraltar into europe and then into asia?

or

they came from afrika via asia ala caucus-asians

 

Our elected representatives should have solved dilemma years ago. Regulating forms of Commerce well among foreign States is in their job description. Labor is a form of Commerce.

 

that's not correct, under previous "race" classifications (before modern DNA verified there are no races) people in India/Pakistan/middle east/ north africa were also classified as Caucasian and they don't have the idealized peach-tan complexion...

 

definitely asia first but there is a possibility of the Gibraltar route at a later date I don't think there is any evidence of that as yet.... the Berbers of North africa do have a genetic link to europeans but the reverse could've happened as well and they came across from europe through Gibraltar and back into africa...

 

if your point is protection from melanoma is the reason for dark skin that's questionable... the average age of hunter gatherers would've been about 30, enough time for an individual to raise children and pass on the needed knowledge to survive, that's sufficient time before they would've lived long enough to contract melanoma and die...and dark skinned people are not immune to melanoma they contract just as pale skinned people do... Imo there was a more immediate danger from severe sunburn and death by infection which could kill them before they reached reproduction age of 14-16.... so if there was an environmental/adaptive reaction to sunlight it was protection from burns and not melanoma...again just my opinion...

 

socially maybe but they've mingling for hundreds of years, genetically the japanese maybe culturally homogenous because newcomers are absorbed into the majority but genetically they can not be homogenous...

 

you're assuming skin colour is related to climate, that's never been verified it's circumstantial...I've already stated some factors in natural selection...sexual selection, geographic isolation, environmental adaptation...with environmental adaption natural selection can produce different solutions to remedy the same problem... residents of high altitude regions of the Himalaya's Andes and Ethipoia have developed 2 possibly three different adaptations to surviving at altitude...so lighter skin tones could also have different causes as well...then again it could be another adaptation at work, russian experiments with domesticating the wild fox produced interesting results...foxes were selectively chosen for being docile in mating, as they became more domesticated other unexpected changes occured, they developed floppy ears, curly tails and they changed colour...the genes for being docile were somehow linked to colour and physical appearance...

family groups/hunter gatherers grew in population and became clans...clans evolved into tribal groups, tribal groups grew into nations...isolation inbreeding created a similar appearance but isolation is very rarely total, hunter gathers groups did come together with their neighbours and there would invariable be an exchange of individuals through marriage, because of this there always transition regions where appearance changed gradually from one skin/hair tone to another...european share genes with all groups...

europeans also share genes with asians and africans there is no definitive dividing line between groups it's a gradual change based on geography...

the nonsense is yours, you come up with also sorts of denial without ever once directly confronting the established genetic and biological evidence...

 

lunacy...

 

who the (*)(*)(*)(*) are you to judge who is an "ideal" European??

I have green/blue eyes. Do you have brown eyes? if so, I am more white than you!!

 

Amazing how some ppl still think there are different races, astounding. Do these ppl having extremely undeveloped brain capacity? Its so obvious and well stated wyly, there is NO dividing line between the "races" therefore, there is no separate "races". Simple really.

 

Well,,different cultures will do. I can say this honestly, my office where I worked was a very diversified area,,you name it we had it...LOL

Walking down main street with all the different smells from the different restaurants, and all the people walking around,,it was great. I could not imagine it any other way. You felt alive,,,wonderful.

 

The Caucasus is where the people we now call Europeans, with the lighter skin, first existed.

 

Yes they do, it's just darker. It's a bit fuzzy - going by skin colour, they're not the same, but by geographic origin (such that you can identify broad differences, even if they are slight, in people's appearance), they are. In reality Persians and Arabs are a mix of African, European and Indian, and even positively Oriental in those "stan" countries. This is why this whole classification by skin colour (*)(*)(*)(*) is too simplistic and not accurate at all. I did not say the term was accurate, I'm simply saying that's how it's normally applied.

 

How can you deny it when you are pro-diversity and multiculturalism?

Why?

This has nothing to do with reducing immigration/diversity.

That's nice idealism but doesn't work. Are you going to try to convert muslims? We've tried that.

She looks Sami.

Here is a pure European:

 

lol. im 100 percent white according to 23andMe.

And who do you think you are to decide? Your guess is the same as mine albeit I study anthropology and likely know more than you do.

 

I don't have faith in your government.

because immigrants live next to me and therefore it concerns me.

based on many things, such as race, ethnicity, politics, religion, culture etc.

 

you study anthropology? ....with the lack of anthropological knowledge you've displayed here I call B.S....I studied anthropology in uni before I switched to more a profitable career no one who has studied anthropology would make the comments that you have...

- - - Updated - - -

you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about...

 

So you are trying to say modern humans came out of Africa, migrated to Asia (east and southern) first. And Europe was devoid of modern humans until modern 'Asian' humans migrated into Europe?

Did I get this straight?