http://www.salem-news.com/articles/september112009/911_truth_9-11-09.php Not having read the book myself, I cannot say how much misinformation may be contained within it. But the fact that it has been published at all is to me a sure sign that whatever explanation is suggested will tend to lead suspicions AWAY from those who were chiefly responsible. The good thing about the book is that at least it finally admits that the 9/11 Commission was little more than a lie foisted on an inattentive public who is arguably more incompetent than NORAD and our intelligence community were portrayed. And what does that say about their general ability to think about and analyze what few facts the media has made available to them? That's if you believe that was true in the first place and that that excuse provided a sufficient explanation for EVERYTHING, including the collapse of the WTC towers 1, 2, and 7 in the manner of controlled demolitions. It's hard to see HOW they stretched that alibi to cover THAT inconvenient truth as well. But leave it to a drugged overly medicated society infatuated with dancing stars and idols to swallow that pill without first examining it. If the lid ever blows off the simmering pot of 9/11 it will be interesting to see what kind of hook they will bite into next. After all, there's nothing any newer about this information than the book itself, which is approaching five years old. They lied about 9/11. They lied about "yellow cake" and Iraq's 'WMDs'. They lied about Bin Laden's involvement and death. etc etc They lied. What's new? Pardon me for the mixed metaphors.
No,they didn't 'lie' about 9/11,and you have NO proof they did As for the yellowcake and WMD's...you're wrong And bin laden was involved and sleeps with the fishes Not our fault you refuse to accept that.
You sure seem disturbed by all these kooks, claiming kooky things, don't you? - - - Updated - - - I do have an agenda. What's yours?
Christine Lee Hanson, David Brandhorst, Juliana McCourt, Bernard Brown II, Asia Cottom, Rodney Dickens, Dana Falkenberg, Zoe Falkenberg
we have a two party system, anything that big would have to include both parties and sense they can't get along, the other side would always snitch on the other
Of course you are. No agenda, whatsoever. Just your moral outrage at what you find untrue is what bothers you. I knew that. Never thought anything different. - - - Updated - - - Chasing around kooks, putting out fires (or trying to), worried that their 'kooky' ideas will catch on. I know. Full time job, isn't it?
Full time? Nah - I average about 6 posts a day. Job? Hardly: pointing out 'truther's' impotence is child's play. I mean seriously: no planes, space beams, "no one died on 9/11", letsroll.com is a fountain of free-flowing truth, hurricanes can be steered so that Democrats can't vote.... the idiocy is so easy to point and laugh at. 20,000 posts is remarkable. Is the pay by each 'truther' lie or by individual post?
Why would you care at all what some 'kooks' post? Seems like a waste of your time and your superior intellect to engage 'kooks' for years on end, don't you think?
Kooks beget other kooks. Look how Phil led you around. I prefer to not have my friend's graves spat upon, Fraud.
You miss the part where he said he didn't like truther nuts spitting on the graves of his friends,boy?
No? Lying about their deaths, and how they died seems pretty blatantly like 'further an agenda' to me.
That's what 'truthers' do. You are on record with Phil Jayhan claiming that 'no one died on 9/11/01'. I call that disrespecting the dead, Fraud. http://thepoliticalforums.com/threads/6747-9-11-Explained-in-Five-Minutes?p=153727#post153727
