I'm not sure about any special grant that Griffin may have received from the "GOV" but in the case of a NON-PROFIT, Gage is NOT getting special treatment at all the fact is any group that can satisfy the requirements for being a real non-profit, gets the tax breaks, this is not about somekina special hand-outs from Uncle Sam for the "truther" faction.
So tax breaks from the government isn't some sort of 'special treatment'? Especially from a government he claims was behind 9/11?
what are they supposed to do, deny a legit application for non-profit status? that would be rather blatant ... don't you think?
You need your hand held, I see. Okay, I'll try to use small words. Stndwn comes in, throwing around insults and changing the subject and accuses other people of throwing around insults and changing the subject. This is known as "hypocrisy". Definition: the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform Lonestrst8 called him on this hypocrisy. Do you understand or shall we continue the discussion along this path?
Yes, its possible to accuse anyone of hypocrisy .... so be it, HOWEVER, back to the topic at hand, and that is I believe the matter of what explanation the families of the victims have been given. My take on the subject is that the families have NOT been given proper information about what happened to their loved ones. We must ask questions & DEMAND answers, remember ALL of the Senators & Congresspeople & the President are all employees of the voters & taxpayers of this nation.
Debunked by those that have an agenda to pursue? Conversely, 'anyone with a brain' can see the mammoth holes in the whole 9/11 fiasco.
What does that have to do with debunking anything? - - - Updated - - - Oh, please. There certainly are.
Oh please. There are holes you can drive a truck through. Whenever they're mentioned though, they get buried in ridicule, and misdirection.
Significant bits of real evidence are brushed aside by the debunker faction. The fact that YOU do not get it, in no way negates the validity of the evidence.
It is rather telling that Boeing has not weighed in on the issue of can you even operate an airliner ( at all ) at the alleged 590 MPH at so near sea level. the lack of definitive INFORMATION on this subject alone is very interesting indeed!