Mom Viciously Attacked Online for Photo With Flag, Gun & Bible

Hmmm she seems to have the right to bear arms against her enemies.

No they weren't civilians did not have a cannon in their backyard, just in-case. So, sorry you cannot have a Abrams tank or Nuke, when you going to understand that?

 

The Muslims use suicide bombers to kill wantonly. The Americans and the Israelis use tanks, attack choppers, drones and bombers to kill wantonly.
There is no difference in their actions.

 

What violence reaps is continuity and reciprocity. In other words, once a decision is made to use violence as a form of problem solving...you can't undo what is done. You can't shoot someone and then attempt a rational dialog with them. There's also the issue of reciprocity, violence begets violence.

Matthew 26:52
"Put your sword back in its place," Jesus said to him, "for all who draw the sword will die by the sword."

 

The photo was taken to garner attention and attention she got. Don't see why she is complaining. When you publicly post something, you should be prepared to take the negative along with the positive feedback. IMO...she is a poster child for one of those bat crap crazy bible thumping survivalist factions in this country. You have your interpretation and I have mine. Zero to argue about here.

 

Oh My...someone called a Christian gun totin' mommy names on facebook?

Certainly worthy of a thread.

 

Hoping someone child dies so it's "one less conservative underling" isn't vicious? You're so partisan that calling a woman a slut is worse then hoping for the death of child simply because of their party affiliation. Whatever credibility you had before is gone to zero. Don't act like you're a champion for the people's cause while you're spouting crap like that.

 

I'll disagree. Exodus Chapter 20, verse 23 "you shall not kill"

 

Nothing wrong with the picture; she has an absolute right to post whatever she legally wants to. But she does need to get a life.

 

Which woman are you talking about? The one wearing the burka, a sign of her subjugation, or the other photo?

 

And you would be wrong again...

Gun Safety Regulation in Early America

 

Both need to get a life.

 

It was translated incorrectly from the orginal that was in Greek. Read up on it and you will be enlightened and the meaning between the two is very different.

 

Cannot rep you again yet. Great point and one that I have brought up in the past. I often wonder when these folks are going to insist on having a private stash of undepleted uranium. Will the insanty never end?

 

Maybe you should re-read your source, did you know it also said Boston banned loaded guns within city limits, I doubt you did. Strange it does not mention tanks and nukes, oh wait they did not exist so they are....... not covered, better run out and get yours before they are banned.

- - - Updated - - -

The simple answer to your questions is, sadly, No.

 

So whats wrong with the woman on the left expressing her constitutional rights?

Is it her, or is it the constitution, you dislike?

 

You obviously didn't read it. Nowhere in the laws of the time did it ban private ownership of military weapons. And according to the original law, the reason they required weapons to be unloaded while stored in buildings is because "the depositing of loaded arms in the houses of the town of Boston, is dangerous to the lives of those who are disposed to exert themselves when a fire happens to break out in the said town."

 

Who said anyone disliked either woman, oh that would be you, seems like they are both expressing their rights. But a reminder, having a right does not mean you have to run out and express it and that when you do others have the right to express their rights by voicing their opinion on your expression, you simply hate that part don't ya, darn Constitution and Bill of Rights bites ya just when you want to ignore it.

 

The Hebrew word is ratsach which can mean can mean “kill” or “slay,” either on purpose or accidentally.

 

Does not say they are military weapons either, nice try.

 

I know the woman on the left can be commonly found with bombs strapped to her blowing up little children on busses and weddings... <sarc>

 

It was not written in Hebrew most written documents were written in the global language of the time and that was Greek.

 

Thank you for being the Democrat poster child for "Class Act"

 

Lefties LOVE them some terrorists. They support arming them and coddling them.

 

The Torah was written in Hebrew, that is the source.

 

So now Canons are NOT military weapons?