Why do you want to fill America up with non-whites?

The Supreme court defined it as caucausion ,or originating from Europe.

Why wouldn't they be? Almost all Europeans have some Southern European heritage.

 

That is not right and is ignorant to racism. we should decide who we let in for our wellbeing.

 

Multiculturalists. People who dont give a damn about race.

 

Agreed; let's let the native americans decide who gets to stay and who doesn't.

Because, let's not forget; every single person of european descent in the US comes from a line of immigrants.

- - - Updated - - -

You mean decent people?

I can't really sympathize with your dislike for them.

 

Why are proportions relevant if the argument is using immigration to demonstrate the desirability of a given country?

 

A peoples don't have to have similar outward appearances to promote unity. They just need a common cause.

Race is nothing but a false social construct anyway. Our appearance and other physical attributes are just the result of environmental adaptations. So it is a choice to be 'white', or 'black' in the racial sense. It is a frame of mind one chooses to adopt also.

So as long as people 'choose' to be a stupid color.... well... you will always racism.

If you want unity in this country, choose to be an American. Not Euro American, African American, Asian American... or what ever stupid multiple continental name ya come up with.

 

They were defeated. You dont ask the loser how things should be run. Makes no sense.

That doesn't justify multiracial countries and racemixing.

A race is important. Its important to avoid race problems and disunity. I only advocate a one race society to obliterate racism. If we changed immigration laws I will move on with my life and join the "I dont give a damn about race group" too.

 

It helps. It helped in Germany.

Yeah.

Then how can something that is real be a false construct?

Yeah, its a culture.

The unfortunate thing is that you will always have enough idiots who do this, and you need to accept that like I have.

That will help but its natural for people to want to identify with their race/culture.

 

interesting deflection on why it's ok to call a race of people "chimps" or say they have a lower IQ....

 

Well, it's not OK to call them chimps. I am against name calling

 

Because they used 'race' as the bases for their common cause.

Perception, and brainwashing are very powerful.

I don't have to accept idiocy. I choose call it out every chance I get.

People just want to be able to identify with each other. Race/culture is just a popular vehicle for it. Find something else more constructive is what I suggest. Although culture identity isn't corrosive, but racial identity is. Culture is real and tangible. Race is superficial.

 

What facts and probabilities are we not taking into consideration? You tell me.

They already have. America has been here for centuries. There is less racial strife now than there was in the 60s...and we are more diverse now than we were in the 60s. If your theory were correct, that would not be the case.

Annoying for who? I am not seeing a mass exodus of white people. They are annoying for racists maybe...but racists make up a negligible portion of our population. And if they don't like it, they can GTFΟ...no one is holding a gun to their head to stay here. Let them go back where they came from.

Yeah, he's white. Jews are white. They have white skin and blue eyes and all the other "white" traits...right?

If you don't believe they are white, I'd like to know the physical criteria you are using to define a Jew as distinct from a Caucasian.

Who is saying you can't? That's up to the Israelis...I am only concerned with America. I'm not an Israeli citizen.

Oh good, we agree on something then.

If race and behavior are not linked, why do you care who immigrates here? Why does it matter?

Why are they not ahead of us? Except for Israel, all of those nations have had a head start of centuries...in some cases millenia. Why are we leading them?

America is not declining or struggling. The US still has the strongest economy in human history. It still has the strongest military in human history. it still has the most advanced technology in human history.

LOL...it sure says something about racist nations that they cannot even compete with multi-racial America as it is "going down the drain", don't you think?

We already debunked this. You consider Jews a different race, despite the fact that they have the same appearance as whites. You still consider dark skinned whites to be the same race as light skinned whites, despite a difference in skin color. Clearly you do not believe "#1".

How did you determine what is "enough"?

 

Please post your evidence that "multi-culturalists" are killing off white people specifically. I have not heard about this before. Please post some links.

- - - Updated - - -

Because I am not Israeli. I'm American. I do not concern or affect on Israel's immigration policy.

That being said, Israel has a significant non-Jew population. at least 1/5 of Israel is non-Jewish - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Israel - Further, there are no voting restrictions for non-Jews. Suffrage is universal.

Europe has more whites than us, and has for centuries longer than us. Why are they not ahead of us?

The America of then was weaker than the America of today. Our technology alone is significantly more advanced. The America of the 60s was not an unrivaled superpower.

Give me examples of areas in white racist nations have succeeded against us.

Your speculation is not evidence. Let me know when it actually happens somewhere other than your imagination.

LOL!

The fact that they are racist means they cannot be a meritocracy. They are mutually exclusive terms. A meritocracy means you advance based on your merits...racist societies exclude people based on things other than their merits, such as skin color or ethnic background.

Using that criteria, almost no one is pure white anymore. You said this yourself in a previous post in this thread. Most Europeans also have non-white ancestry.

It is an inferior ideology, and is recognized as such by the majority of Americans.

So what? Lots of Europeans have naturally dark skin. Especially in Mediterranean nations like Spain and Italy. Some Italians are very dark.

How did you determine that?

 

It helped Germany lose a war to America. We did not even need to use nukes to do it. Racial unity did not appear to help them to resist our invasion of their homeland.

Had Germany embraced it's Jew minority, they might have actually succeeded.

Due to Hitler's racist policies, America assimilated many intellectual giants that might have otherwise become part of the German intellectual portfolio. Einstein was certainly not the only example.

 

Indeed, regardless of race, creed, or ethnicity.

That is what "we" stand for.

 

Oh but they do, just in the opposite sense that you do. You care about race in that you want purity and preservation, they care about race in that they want mixing. People who don't care about race, like me, are equally opposed to both.

Proportions are relevant because you talked about immigration rate.

 

Do you know the man in your avatar is a racist icon? His 1924 immigration policy is what I am fighting to restore. Its what I want.

We have to take into account race, unless it brings you happiness to have arabs throw rocks at you, burn your car and pay money in government programs to help mentally deficient minorities. Its also annoying the constant race baiting and accusations of racism.

 

I'd rather say I want beauty. I believe that purity is beautiful. It also avoids annoying race problems as multiracial countries do not work and have annoying racial problems.

There has been mixing for thousands of years and it never led to anything good other than extermination of once successful countries.

 

The study used data from the Framingham Heart Study and 1,932 men and women's SNPs in Framingham, Massachusetts, were analysed, who happened to be mostly of European descent as is the case with other medical research done in the US. Massachusetts was primarily colonised by English settlers and white Americans in the town of Framingham are more likely to share great-great-great grandparents due to their common ancestry compared to other parts of America, where immigrants from various European countries moved in. The study, moreover, does not address the question of friendship between people of different ethnic backgrounds because the participants were exclusively white Americans but it could also be possible that America's existing residential arrangements resulted from enforced segregation measures in the past may have affected how people interact with others in the old colonial town.

[video=youtube;21amLRXNk0A]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21amLRXNk0A[/video]

 

Anything, like science saying that certain genes are linked to aggression and only certain races have these genes. Or that certain races are failing high school and staying poor while others are succeeding. We should put a cap on the race that is failing until they have their act together.

America has race problems and spends billions each year helping minorities.

Everyone. Minorities are annoyed they are supposedly victims of racism while whites are annoyed of always being accused of it.

We cant leave because people like you are forcing minorities into the lands we came from. Many of us will go to a country if it were our own.

Jews are mixed among different ethnicities. Many of them have European ancestry and therefore white traits, but its wrong to say they are pure whites when they originated in the middle East.

ethnicity.

Personally, I don't agree with it nor do I deny it. I am undecided and simply do not know.

Appearance.

Because they are a fraction of the size and race mixing brought them down. But ancient rome was a prosperous society for a much longer time than America.

Yes.

There are no racist nations at the moment, only formerly racist countries. It takes a lot to bring them down.

They are easily distinguishable.

No, there no such thing as a dark skinned white. If he has dark skinned he is mixed.

 

Oh yes, I want beauty too. But it's not like all white people are beautiful, nor that all non-white people are ugly, so it makes no sense to restrict immigration on racial grounds if you want more beauty.

I agree that there can be some annoying racial problems... See, it's not other races per se that's the problem. I actually don't mind them at all. But what is a very big problem is when leftist idiots rile up minorities by telling them that they're victims, and minority interest groups start forming and demanding special treatment, and then the majority population starts to resent the minorities, and then it's a downward spiral. So with that in mind, homogeniety is preferable.

Like what countries and what mixing?

 

Certain ethnic types are beautiful and they will go extinct if we let other races in. For instance, science says people with thin faces are more attractive than people with wider faces, and this is genetically and racially determined.

Another example is two beautiful people are likely to produce a beautiful child with the same traits. Two ugly people will not.

If you talk to a plastic surgeon, they will tell you the most beautiful human trait is the eyes. Other races have dark eyes and they aren't as nice as colorful eyes. If you breed out people with colorful eyes we are shooting ourselves in the foot if we want beauty because the likely hood or probability of someone being good looking with dark eyes is smaller than if they have colored eyes.

Another example is certain ethnic types do not have flaws. Like Nordic people tend to have colorful eyes, thin faces, thin nose bridges (a wide nose bridge is ugly because it detracts from someones eyes and is agreed to be a flaw by everyone) longer faces etc.

Good. Hallelujah.

I don't mind other races if they don't accuse me of being racist and demand special treatment or come at the expense of my own race or people. I can accept a little diversity but accepting diversity to the point where there will be no white people is too much.

This will always happen. There will always be people doing this in a multiracial society. There will always be minorities who feel as victims of racism against the majority.

Sumeria, Sychthians. Egypt. Parthians, ancient rome and Greece. Many others I don't remember. These countries mixed with foreign labor until they no longer exist.

 

You can do that all you like but you have to accept other peoples idiocy if enough of them are idiots.

But people are superficial. Most women wont even give you a chance unless you meet her physical standards. You can call it shallow, superficial and dumb all you want but its the way it is.

Part of my cultural identity is my racial identity. I identify with being white.

 

I didn't read this right.

My view is not all pure people are beautiful, but all beautiful people are pure.

There are some mixed race people who are attractive and good looking, but its always due to their white side.


Show me a pure Asian, Black, Arab, Indian person who is beautiful. My opponents can only show mixtures where undoubtedly the white side is what is good about them and their flaws are always from their non-white side.

There are good looking people of other races, but I have never seen someone who is beautiful like I have seen in whites. I have NEVER seen a pure non-white who was a 10/10. The highest ive ever seen a non-white was like a 9/10 and this was a Japanese actress or any 9/10 non-white is ALWAYS mixed with whites.

And I forgot to mention that the best looking races are usually Cro Magnons and Meditteraneans. Most celebrities are of these ethnic kinds and people who are voted as the most beautiful people in the world are usually Meditteranean.

 

Flaccid superpower?