Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

anybody seen this: Discussion of "FLT93" crash

Discussion in '9/11' started by genericBob, Sep 14, 2014.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    genericBob, Sep 14, 2014
    #1
  2. Rickity Plumber

    Rickity Plumber Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2013
    Messages:
    1,122
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    0
    First of all, "15 feet and 25 feet deep" does not mean the boxes were buried. It mean the crater was so large and deep that the boxes were at a depth from original ground level. Not hard to figure out and by the way, if any nut job believes the boxes were at these depths all by themselves covered up has more than a few screws loose.

    Secondly, I rarely respond to a thread from the OP when they offer only a u tube video or some other lame reasoning for absolute truth and not comment on the link themselves. I only responded to your stuff because I have fun with these trufers and their claim that this is the only way it went down. Of course and then everybody is wrong except the trufer.

    It would be nice if you left your opinion.
     
    Rickity Plumber, Sep 14, 2014
    #2
  3. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My take on this is that all 4 airliners from 9/11/2001 are bogus!
    the fact that in the case of the "FLT93" crash site, there is so little of the aircraft to be seen, somehow, we lose 50 tons of aluminum + other materials, and passenger remains, luggage ...... what? there simply isn't enough stuff to justify calling this an airliner crash site.
    not to mention also the fact that the excavation of the site wasn't recorded on video, there are simply a few still photos but it really wasn't documented and for a dig, where they would as likely as not uncover human remains and potentially bits of critical evidence, WHY was that back-hoe in use at all? The whole bit stinks big time!
     
    genericBob, Sep 14, 2014
    #3
  4. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    cjnewson88, Sep 14, 2014
    #4
  5. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Again showing your lack of knowledge of crash sites. Not surprised.
     
    Hoosier8, Sep 14, 2014
    #5
  6. Shangrila

    Shangrila staff Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    29,114
    Likes Received:
    674
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Rule 11 closure/lacking sufficient elaboration

    Shangrila
    Moderator
     
    Shangrila, Sep 14, 2014
    #6
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page