For all the truthers especially the ones that insist the proof is right in front of our eyes of an inside job, no hijacked planes, blah blah blah. Where's your Pulitzer Prize??? It's just there for the taking right?
OH MY ....... really what it takes is not only being able to write well, but also telling the story in a way that the public will get it. and this is ( because of the psychological warfare going on... ) one of the reasons why its so extremely difficult to get any traction with anything, people will dismiss the 9/11 as false flag idea because they have already been conditioned to think of the "truthers" as crack-pots and therefore very few people will have the guts to actually examine evidence. another facet of this is notion that people somehow need to be EXPERTS to actually get it and therefore many people deffer to experts. I refuse to play the game of "my experts are better than your experts" I KNOW what I KNOW and there are very good reasons why I KNOW what I KNOW.
plenty of people can write well and all good writers are looking for that bestseller or blockbuster expose'. So why hasn't anyone blown this open if it so obviously an inside job? I think you know the answer to that question.
People who winn Pulitzers with.proof' like truthers like to use,end up having to return them in disgrace,like Jayson Blair.
I would never and have never used the sources I see 'em using. I use the NYTimes, LATimes, Washington Post, WSJ, FT, Government documents, academic research...the sources that get peeps a Pulitzer. There is an ungodly avalanche of information on the Internet from those sources.
The proof is very clear. http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=390915&page=3&p=1064629314#post1064629314 It was an inside job.
linking to your own spam filled post doesn't cut it,Scott/cosmored/fatfreddy88/david c.. and the only thing that's 'crushing' is your inability to prove any of your hogwash
very serious problem with this whole fiasco, the fact that the prosecution, has yet to provide any prof that any of the 4 alleged airliners existed at all. sorry about that.........
(not the one I wanted to use. What happened to the normal laughing one?) I did address the OP. You know, post #4 from January 4th, 2015 that you never responded to.
really? ... that was a pretty weak response not worth addressing ... surely Seymour Hersh would have been all over this ... where's Noam Chomsky when you need him? ... all you have is a bunch of cranks making money off YouTube spouting nonsense that you regurgitate due to confirmation bias ... you have yet to posit a theory ...
I actually had a several months worth of back-and-forth e-mail exchange with him last year about 9/11. Like many extremely controversial things in U.S. History (of the Northwoods/MK-Ultra variety), he won't probe it like he has with the Cold War, Indochina War or propaganda.