Bush Tax Cuts Responsible For Almost A Third Of Deficit In Last 10 Years

No that would be you. You are incapable of objectivity here, or else you would realize that i have had many years of experience in this form of Saul Alinsky and Monty Python style argumentation and you would drop the matter.

You are the one who is doing this because you can not be objective. Only you.

So you are a troll, a blindly partisan liberal troll.

You have no facts, only what you've been spoon fed.


You are too bigoted to be objective and unbiased to understand how you look and sound.

i am not trying to troll you here. These are my honest evaluations of you and your behavior.

It is only you that is creating this problem, not me.

Good day.

 

Three posts in a row from the low informed types that support the party of stupid, using ONLY ad hominems and NOT being able to refute a single word. I'm shocked

 

That's exactly what they did.

 

Math is not their thing I suppose.

 

He has no argument.

 

More Soro's noise? How is that? Is the 4 to 6 trillion not true?

 

He didn't inherit 800,000 job losses a month? He didn't inherit Bush's tax cuts? What about inheriting an auto industry collapse? Obama didn't inherit that?

 

No,No and No


next excuse for owebama?

 

September 2008 – 432,000 jobs lost
October 2008 – 489,000 jobs lost
November 2008 – 803,000 jobs lost
December 2008 – 661,000 jobs lost

January 2009 – 818,000 jobs lost
February 2009 – 724,000 jobs lost
March 2009 – 799,000 jobs lost
April 2009 – 692,000 jobs lost

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Job_losses_caused_by_the_Great_Recession

 

And how has it been a waste exactly?

 

We'll, seeing that Dad2three is the one supplying the substance, and you have yet to supply us with any substance of your own other than your opinion, how can you bring into question his substance or his credibility, when you've provided none for yourself?

 

Oh look, the usual Saul Alinsky liberal tag team tactic!

Yawn.

 

; http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/ri...-is-creating-more-new-jobs-than-george-w-bush Do you have different figures?

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/24/opinion/sunday/24sun4.html And how did Obama not inherit the Bush tax cuts?

And so explain to us all how he also did not inherit an auto industry collapse as well; http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeff-schweitzer/obama-to-blame-for-hurric_b_6364268.html

I think the next question will be, what is your next excuse.

 

And Bill Clinton got it started with the Gramm Bill and NAFTA. Two dreadful laws that should've never been signed.

 

I rest my case. Seems to be working huh? When you walk into a court room and one lawyer comes prepared with facts and figures, while the other is left with just an opinion, they look over at the judge and the verdict is read, who is the one standing there with his or her pants down while the judge renders the decision?

 

Well, it fixed none of the underlying problems with costs.(Of which, there were many). It just subscribed us all to health insurance. Big Pharma's version of the draft! For every man, woman and child in the U.S. Administrative costs will still be prohibitive, as will our treatments. And yes, there won't be(and hasn't been) too much of a reduction on insurance policy prices due to the artificial demand.

But then, the insurance companies knew that. They negotiated directly with Democrats. The Democrats gave them a bailout bill, and didn't recognize it(hell, still don't recognize it)

The ACA is nothing more than a re-organization of health care, a very miserable re-organization of health care. I can promise there'll be a new and improved structure, and whether there's one or not, the people will still have our beloved insurance. Insurance isn't the issue, organization(how to pay) is what's being legislated. Regardless of what Washington does, you can still buy HC as a citizen.

I was a very pissed off 17 year old Liberal, since conscription is the last thing I endorsed. I thought in Obama, we were going to change from the wars, address the debt and bring the economy back. The very first thing I got was Obama endorsing cronyist bills(some of the largest in US History) as well as our new draconian draft.

Lone is right, Liberals did waste an opportunity to bring back the Clinton years. Liberals acted like Republicans, on the "Health Care crusade." And what a crusade it was! Utterly stupid and it blew an opportunity. Liberals might still have the legislature if they governed on what they campaigned on.

 

Really? THAT started it? The GOP G/S bill? HOW please? Ronnie's NAFTA the one from Heritage Foundation Ronnie gave US the day he announced his run for Prez in 1979??

 

HOW did the Dems EVER have a chance to have Medicare for all? SERIOUSLY???

EXPLAIN HOW anything BUT THE HERITAGE ENDORSED ROMNEYCARE WOULD BE GETTING THROUGH! ,

 

Sure he did; By 2019 it's expected that between the wars and the tax cuts those two will cost almost half of what our deficit is expected to be; http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=3849 Obama initiated neither the tax cuts or the wars.

 

I answered you,scooter...No,and No


Alll the president 'inherits' is a bunch of political arse kissers

 

How so? I have friends at this very moment who have reduced monthly payments and out of pocket expenses that they couldn't afforded before, but now can.

 

he could have tackled the more pressing problems of unemployment,first,that's how...

 

Your comeback is comical, yet sad. Why do you even bother, when you have nothing to counter my claims? Aren't you embarrassed? I know I would be. Getting caught with your pants down isn't much fun, and I can promise you, if I new someone was going to bury me alive with substance while I provided nothing but partisan hate speech, this boy would have never shown himself to the party to begin with.

 

name them then....give us facts and figures on just how much they 'saved'

 

Going from 10% to 5.7% unemployment, and stopping the bleeding of 6 to 800,000 jobs a month when he arrived, I'd say he's addressed the issue.