Same sex couples will produce biological children together

I predicted this on this forum years ago.

 

This was an obvious stop on the gay Agenda express, the goal of their incedious plan is to utterly gut the Morality, and family structures of the western world. Most notably in the United States, the last real bastion of Spiritual and Moral authority.

The Slipperly slope is bad enough, but a preplanned anti American campaign is out right treason.

 

Treason against who exactly? Do you think you represent the majority of Americans?

 

Treason against America.

I represent myself, as far as majority no I do not think so ; the gay agenda has been succesful in its propoganda war especially using public schools, and popular culture to spread this disease. But I think my position will regain the majority, but it does not really matter since you do not need majority to support my position I need the majority of people who vote and participate in goverment. Given that Repubs regained Senate and house I think we ar ein good shape to fight back against the gay nigthmare.

 

Who represents America, if not the majority?

Then you do not represent America.

So you are either saying that people are too weak willed to resist the gay agenda, or that they agree with it anyway. Which is it?

If people are really as weak willed as you seem to believe they are, I do not see how you can regain the majority.

Same difference. The people who do not vote are agreeing with the majority. Indifference is a choice. Refusing to vote is the same thing as voting for whoever wins.

Are you sure?

I am a Republican as well btw. I have voted pretty much a straight Republican ticket since Clinton. I voted for Bush both terms, and voted against Obama.

You might not represent quite as many Republicans as you thought.

 

The people we elect to represent us.

No.

Yes this is true, many are weak willed and need guidance.

Fight the Propoganda with information, and use political intelligence to out manuever the gay agenda.

people who vote are the people who matter, and those are majority anti gay agenda. Otherwise the republicans would not hold the congress.

I am confident.

I do not represent anyone, and Republicans who are for gay agenda are not really republicans.

 

And the sickness deepens.

 

There is nothing wrong with this.

Provide one logical reason why this is a bad thing.

 

Yeah, lots of people said that about interracial babies too.

Technically, there is nothing unnatural about it...a baby is coming from an egg cell and a sperm cell. And infertile couples stand the most to gain from the technology, not homo couples.

 

OR, two people who love each other want to start a family with no other agenda.

 

That would be a great plan. Except that according to you, it is impossible. Because people are weak willed.

If they are weak willed and being guided by your enemies, how exactly do you plan to obtain the majority?

If that was true we would have a majority of politicians fighting the "gay agenda", right? The empirical evidence does not support your conclusion.

In fact, if the majority was really against this, they could simply amend the constitution, removing any interference from the judicial branch completely. Why have they not done so?

So you are admitting that a good chunk of the Republicans you are pointing to in your statistics do not really represent what you consider to be Republican. Which means you are actually further from your goal than you think you are.

Even if Republicans obtained sweeping victories in future elections, you still might not get your way, since many of them would not be "real" Republicans according to you.

 

Are you serious? This reads like propaganda.

What "gay agenda"? What "insidious plan"? What "family structure"?

You seem to have it all figured out: how everyone should live, who everyone should live with, who can have babies, what morality is, what a family is, what the gay agenda is. Congrats?

 

If this was so immoral, why does your God allow for such a thing to be possible ? You'd think if it wasn't natural, two men couldn't produce a baby. But because science is making that a real possibility, isn't that because God allowed it ?

 

So I wonder... will it be possible to produce biological children from three parents, with equal genetic contributions from each?

Three-person marriage

 

Yes I am serious, it reads like propoganda because you are engrained in the gay agenda movement.

The gay agenda that is waging this morality war, the plan to destroy American way of life, the nuclear family structure.
Great men before me figured things out.

- - - Updated - - -

God gave us free will.

 

The gay nigthmare (sic)?? Unless you're getting gay raped, I don't think you have anything to worry about. And in the event you are, by all means please press charges and have the rapist locked up. Otherwise, you're fearing things you have no reason to fear.

 

Its much worse, society is getting raped.

 

No, it's not. SSM has been legal in my State for about 3 months now, and if I hadn't been informed by the media about it, I wouldn't even have noticed. It's so not a big deal.

 

Free Will is an issue of choice. But the anti-gay argument from the religious right has been that it is not natural. But now, that argument is falling flat on its face too. If it was unnatural, then there should be no scientific way for the DNA of two men to make a baby. But that's not what happened, is it ?

 

We have no way of knowing that these "offspring" will actually qualify as human beings.

 

Really? I'm guarantee you that they will.

 

your not gonna get koodies from gay people, grow up

 

Circular logic at its best lol.

Free will means we can choose to do as we wish, we can create Nuclear bombs and destroy ourselves if we wanted to. Just because we can do something does not mean we should.

 

Yeah, really.

Why should anyone find that interesting?

 

No one should. It wasn't meant to be interesting.