Yes, more and more restrictive laws concerning women's reproduction IS an attempt to control women, who else gets pregnant? """"""A "problem" of unwanted pregnancies is well within peoples control...long before it gets to an abortion mill."""" As shown by the history of the world it is not always "well within people's control"......and having a choice of abortion IS control of one's own body.
Control of ones body was never in dispute. The problem is that dishonest people are trying to blend another human's life into this as if it's part of the womans body. It's not.
If a fetus isn't part of a woman's body then she has every right to have it removed.....why should anyone have to carry an "extra" piece around... If it's not part of her body then removing it and setting it on a shelf should be fine.....
Isn't it strange that the region which preaches 'morals', abstinence and 'god' the most also has the highest teen pregnancy and divorce rates in the US? http://www.citylab.com/politics/2012/04/teen-birthrates-are-way-down-still-high-these-states/1735/ http://www.christianpost.com/news/s...y-break-ups-is-it-about-faith-or-race-114582/
Why not? What does it need? If it's not part of the woman's body as you claim then why can't it survive on it's own?
Fox, there are plenty of books and publications on the birds and the bees, and how life grows. I'm sorry your parents didn't pull you aside at a young age and explain them...but thats not up to me. If you dont understand such things, perhaps this entire issue is above you being able to participate. You need more than a bunch of feelings in life Fox, sometimes you need to know exactly what the heck you're talking about.
You could just say "I can't answer that"".... without all the attempts at childish insults........ I haven't called it "the birds and the bees" since second grade......maybe you should update... Sometimes you need science more than your feeeeeeelings.....
LOL...seems this morning you think quoting messages will bail you out. It doesnt. In the other thread you quoted me stating NONE of what you claimed and proved you were a liar. In this one you strung together another bunch of quotes that dont help you. This question was answered. It cant survive on it's own. If you want all the scientific reasons for such, thats on you to elevate yourself to the level of the debate...or lower than that level in this case. Another fail.
So you're the authoritative science guy who knows so much more than I but you can't answer simple questions to help "educate " me.....got it """Try again? :Why not? What does it need? If it's not part of the woman's body as you claim then why can't it survive on it's own?
These arent legitimate questions Fox. Ive got an idea, how about you just lie again, and write what youw ant to hear and put my name on it...like you did in the other thread that you wont man up about. - - - Updated - - - Once it is able to surive on it's own, you bet.
So you believe in forcing a woman to carry a fetus until it can survive outside the body, so sorry you are not in control of another persons body and you will never get the laws you want to carry out your wish to control other peoples reproductive rights. - - - Updated - - - I have been at this long enough to count on them coming, most of them are simply regurgitated nonsense and not worth a cursory read no less a reply.
Life forces the Woman to carry the baby to term. Sorry Capser, mans laws dont invalidate the order of life. The Woman put it there, with help from her Man friend. "Reproductive rights" lol....another "right" invented by the left.
No life does not force women to carry a fetus to term, that is what You want to do. They did not mean to put it there and they have the right to remove it, and will keep that right, period.
For the umpteenth time. This has happened many times before and will happen many times in the future....the result will always be a status quo and the Pro-Lifers will never recognize the futility. Nothing to see here...move along....move along.
Like you don't know. It needs sustenance for starts. Are you claiming its a parasite and so should be removed?
Be prepared for a bunch of fluff posts feigning ignorance on subjects a 5th grader would know, and then filling in the gaps with lies.
The other poster claimed a fetus was NOT part of a woman's body. Hence, the question: If it's not part of the woman's body as you claim then why can't it survive on it's own? I never mentioned "parasite". and gave NO reason why "it should be removed"......
So your just playing dumb or trolling ? Because its a human life and will die if you do if taken to early. With all the people waiting on line to adopt babies why would anyone whos fetus is viable at least not save it and put it up for adoption instead of killing it?
OK, YOU volunteer to disrupt 9 months of your life with pain and discomfort, temporary and permanent damage to your body, financial loss, time off work, possible job loss, career and education setbacks, all to give someone else a kid....and just so some stranger can feel all self-righteous? That would be stupid. Can't you answer this question: If it's not part of the woman's body as (the other poster) claimed then why can't it survive on it's own?
You expecting different results from the same actions, there is a word for such thinking. But, Yes, we will see.
You're a fan of science. It has advanced so much since the days of Roe v Wade, that this issue is due another look.
