Because when a person is run over by a car you do not test for knife wounds. If is proven what brought down the buildings and no evidence of any kind even SUGGESTS explosives.
All the evidence says explosions. Dozens of witnesses reported explosions. The gazillion pictures available show explosions. Debris was ejected laterally because of explosions.
No evidence of any kind supports an idea of explosives. No pictures show explosions and a few witnesses mean nothing.
No,no,no and finally no NO evidence says explosions Witnesses say they HEARD what sounded like explosions,but as heard in the 1999's big blue crane collapse in Milwaukee,things can SOUND like explosions,and not be explosions. NONE of the pictures taken show explosions.....NONE And the debris was ejected that way because of the force of the collapse
the problem is not that there is no evidence both watching the building and the iron, the problem is that there is no one who supports the official story knows enough about the subject to recognize if explosives were used. thats the real problem.
That is all false. Every one with expertise in those areas knows there is no evidence of explosives and what instead actually caused the collapse. The so called official story is proven by evidence. Twoofer theories have zero evidence of any sort
And the fact that because proper forensic procedures were not followed and the crime scene was not preserved, no good accounting could be made. They got rid of the evidence on purpose.
well official story supporters who now days are invariably nothing more than propaganda pushing posers have made themselves into the laughing stock of the country. Only posers would claim there were no explosives then prove it by not testing for them. I mean that is some seriously laughable twisted logic that we have seen from those people.
