Britain First carries out Christian Patrol in Islamist hotspot Bury Park, Luton

Nothing like sucking up that koolaid - I believe its called berry berry bigoted.

don't know anyone that is "pretending" that, since that is as stupid as saying white nationalist bigots never do anything wrong.

 

Don't go all fascist and demand that people may not dress the way you like. That's quiet inappropriate.

Nobody likes a bunch of screaming Christian fruitcakes waving their wooden crosses in peoples faces.
I haven't seen muslims do that in the west.

- - - Updated - - -

If you walk around screaming, your religion is taking over, waving your wooden crosses in peoples faces...
than you're going to have a bad day no matter where.

 

If telling the truth about 3rd world muslim sandboxes is bigoted, then call me the biggest bigot ever lol. I don't take that as offensive coming from muslim apologists, it's just a word they use to try and derail people from telling the truth because muslims and muslim apologists hate that kind of thing.

And I don't care who you are, If I feel you cause problems I want you shut the hell down. Rpepublicans, democrats, chirstians, neo nazis, muslims , etc. etc. If you are a problem then you need to be handled. And right now muslims are a big issue because of their disregard and disrespect to other nations laws and citizens.

Muslims need to go to their sandboxes until they can act better in civilized countries.

 

Hate to see Europe becoming the Crapistan Caliphate BUT it is their countries and how the choose to live is up to them. Maybe we will see what happens and be able to avoid the same cultural destruction IF it turns out as badly as I am afraid it will.

 

The Nazi's are the Muslims. What will be most satisfying is that even you will figure it out sooner or later. For your sake, you best hope it the former.

 

What the intellectuals on the left really want is for there to be so many people from the Middle East that the borders and nationalities in Europe will not really matter. Then, and only then, they feel, will there be nothing in the way of all of Europe merging into one.

Muslims are especially efficacious towards this goal, because if the divisions within each country can be made greater than the divisions between different countries, then there will be fewer objections to taking down the walls between countries. Why try to protect your nationality if 70 percent of the citizens in your nation are not your nationality? If the people in France look the same as the people in Germany—if both countries have become culturally like the Middle East—than what really is the difference? Might as well just throw down the borders.

Same thing with language. Why would the people in Europe have a strong affinity for their country's language if their parents did not even grow up speaking that language. Try to tell the French, or the Germans, that they should just give up their national language and learn another common European language instead, they would never do that. But when most of the citizens in France and Germany are only second or third generation, it might sound like a better idea. After all, if their parents went to the trouble of learning French, why not have their children grow up learning some other language besides French?

I do not know if this is true, but I read somewhere that the most common native language in Western Europe is now Arabic (more people in Europe grew up speaking Arabic than English or German or French).

 

That sums up the "Christians" in the vid. But some Christians here have expressed similar views.

Don't forget the Irish!

 

Your post combined with the Buckley quote blew my irony meter.

 

Like I said. There is an awakening in your future. The sooner the better, and what I or any other American has to say won't matter one bit in your epiphany. It'll all happen right there. Almost on your doorstep.

You can bet your house on it. In fact, you probably have no choice in that.

 

Looked to me like the bigotry was on both sides.

 

That's an absurd response to the video which showed a mob of Muslims becoming unhinged over a passive presence of political activists.

 

I'm an atheist, but it seems like only one religion is waging a holy war against secularists.

 

trouble is your "version" of the truth isn't actually the truth about muslims. Undoubtedly there are all kinds of scumbag muslims. Just like there are all kinds of scumbag Christians, Americans, Pakistanis and every other grouping you would care to use. Even Catholic priests for "god's sakes".

But of course you wouldn't think your hateful attitude is also a problem for society.

Funny, but there are a couple million muslims in America that live under the laws of the land, and act like every other american. But your kind of hater condemns the whole house simply because the porch is rotten and dangerous.

I also find it interesting that you claim I am a muslim apologist because I don't support the obvious bigotry and paranoia you espouse. OTOH, if its a question of "us vs them", I sure as hell am glad I ain't on your team.
'

 

Then it just goes to prove that extremism begets extremism. But hey, I guess violence at a football match is a different sort of violence, and ipso facto acceptable. Well it isn't acceptable, because the next stage of tribalism is nationalism - which sort of brings us back to where we were?

 

Extremists attract extremists. I know liberal do-gooders can't their self-righteous heads around it, but 'bigotry' is a 2-way street.

 

As is said in the region - 'It is written'. Actually it has been written since the 7th century, now they're getting on with the job. To be frank I can't help thinking that a watered-down form of Sharia wouldn't be such a bad thing in our depraved western societies.

 

How so?

 

How so what?

 

Thinking that a watered down Sharia law would be good for society, and also what makes western society so depraved? In fact, I think western society has the least depraved culture in the world, which is why we need to do what we can to maintain that.

 

Where to begin? Increasing levels of paedophilia. A publicly-accessible medium where youngsters are forced to see the most appalling pornography by making one mistaken keystroke on a keyboard. Irrational greed and selfishness. Corrupt politics. Mad-dog psychopaths on our streets who would kill someone for a mobile phone as easily as looking at them. Street gang violence. Exploitation of the most vulnerable sections of society by the opportunistic. (ie physical assault on the young and the old). Social chaos because personal freedoms are abused by disregarding the responsibility to deserve them. And that's just for starters.

Do you? Well I guess it's all subjective, and a question of where one lives.

 

Clearly those Muslims should of cowered at the feet of rent a christian wandering down their streets! How dare they tell a bunch of dumb fascist thugs to (*)(*)(*)(*) off. Fuzzie wuzzies know your place when master comes a callin!

 

You do realise that history does not back you up? When was this golden age when the UK was free of street gangs, child prostitution, mad dog psychopaths and exploitation of the poor?

 

I honestly have no idea whether or not the rates of pedophilia are rising.

Other than an incident in middle school where a porn pop up came on my screen, I have never accidentally looked at porn. It has always been intentional.

Greed and selfishness are ingrained in humanity. No number of laws will reduce it. The best way to not let it be as destructive is to find ways to use it for the betterment of society.

Corrupt politics exist everywhere. Even in theocracies. That kind of ties in to greed and selfishness though.

That seems to me to be the result of poor parenting. I honestly have no idea what could be done to fix this.

I'm a little unsure of what you mean here.

I live in the bible belt of the US. From what I've heard from people who have lived all over the world, we have the friendliest people out of any other state or country they have lived in, so I may be biased.

 

You forgot child chimney sweeps! But don't you think we should have evolved more by now? Does the fact we had those social ills then mitigate having them now? Or are you just arguing for the sake of it!

 

Well I'm off for a long walk now - I'll try and get around to replying later. But essentially you seem to be trying to justify the status quo against times past, and I don't see what that has to do with anything other than to argue for the sake of arguing. Laters, hopefully.