CO2 levels higher than any time in last 800,000 years

Sure you see the proof. I queried the forum yet Democrats lied by signing the petition with fake names.

 

Where is your proof they are democrats? You have nothing especially when it comes to AGW

 

Who but Democrats fakes names on such lists?

Climate change is so slow. So long in happening that nobody today can predict long range.

I am sorry but if the government really believed in AGW, they would long ago have taken action.

This globally is a cluster F.

 

You mean like Micheal Mann falsely claiming to be a Nobel Laureate?

 

And your proof that you talked with him is.................

 

I think you mean unconsciously, unless you think anti-AGWers are just trolls.

 

The green blob tars and react hers without any proof and the useful idiots eat it up.

- - - Updated - - -

The green blob tars and feathers without any proof and the useful idiots eat it up.

 

Yes, since the clear evidence of our data is undeniable.. we have absolute truth about the last 800,000 yrs of global temps..

Can you not see the absurdity of such a claim? It is speculative at best, & is definitely NOT 'settled science'.

 

It is according to every science organization on the planet. It must be lonely being a denier

 

I am not sure how ignorance and logical fallacies promote any kind of intellectual claim of superiority but some cannot help themselves.

 

It must suck to be a propagandist, to claim Universal Truth about something so controversial. Your logical fallacies & appeals to authority do not mean anything to the scientific method.

Tell me HOW you KNOW the earth's temps 800,000 years ago, by empirical fact? You merely believe 'really smart people' who dogmatically claim such nonsense, which has no way of empirical verification. It is all based on assumptions, extrapolations, conjecture, & belief. Yet this is presented to us as Absolute Truth, & we are threatened with eternal damnation if we do not bow to the dictates of the climate priests.

You are just reviving dark ages religious practices.. that of declaring Truth, & killing any dissenters.

 

So which camp are you in.....worldwide conspiracy of the greatest scientific minds on the planet OR the greatest scientific minds on the planet simply got it wrong but YOU have it right. LOL

 

You can keep on chanting the same mantra, but it has no logical or scientific basis. AGW is a religion, & you are a proselytizer for it. I learned many years ago that it is pointless to argue religion with True Believers, & that lesson has been constantly reinforced in my few exchanges with you.

 

You can believe whatever you like. The world is moving on without you. We will continue to address this problem no matter what the tin foil squad says. And there is nothing you can do about it. LOL

 

He once stated that anyone with an 8th grade education in science could understand what he understands. I find it amusing that he keeps proving it.

 

I find it rather telling that those who understand and believe in climate change tend to focus on the data, and those who do not tend to instead focus on the people who do...unpleasantly.

 

It is just the opposite. The OP is constantly appealing to authority, not relaying any hard data, or dealing with scientific problems in the claims. 'Really Smart People' who just happen to have a conflict of interest in the 'science' demand that we believe in them, not the science.

 

I refer you to the NASA AGW website. Mounds of hard data to keep you busy for hours

 

I am happy you asked me for proof.

Proof is what I also expect from you.

Thanks to a fight with AOL, the account with his e mails to me is not accessable by me.

Take this on faith. I really e mailed him wondering two things. Would he read it and would he reply.

I had specific questions.

I knew the left loves to make stories up about people. I directly asked him if he worked for oil companies.

His reply is his paycheck comes from MIT. I talked to him prior to him retiring.

He never has had any interest in furthering oil interests. His papers do not state there is no climate change.

I don't state there is no climate change.

This is what pisses me off.

Go to the Florida sea level site.

What do you read? They claim the sea will rise there by a half meter to a full meter by 2100

There are claims it rose by a few millimeters. Not centimeters, but millimeters. This is in the range of normality.

They blame warm oceans for expanding seas.

What is the problem given we now have resources when such things happened in the past.

What makes a cooler earth normal? Based on evidence, a cooler earth is not normal. But for warming, you would never have the Great Lakes.

If they believe in Global warming in a way to harm humans, they best fix the problem. Carbon dioxide is so normal you produce it all day and night long.

Short of killing humans, they can't fix things.

Get used to it. You will be fine.

 

I think you know predictions. But hard data, you don't know that.

They have not really talked of a problem today. It's all supposed to happen in the next hundred years.

 

Then why does every science organization on the planet disagree with you. I just want to hear you say it

 

What is it that they do not agree with me about?

Is this over blaming man or that climate changes?

 

Do you believe this statement? AGW is real and is a current threat to man that is only getting worse and reductions in co2 will help reduce this threat. 17 national science academies signed a statement to that effect

 

Here is my position.

I do not believe humans manage climate.

Your assumptions are they do manage climate.

These bozos have yapped about this for 3 decades now. Thus far, all talk, no action.

 

Then you disagree with every science organization on the planet. Maybe you are right....but I won't bet on it