What would you put the odds of winning at for a Trump vs. Hillary matchup? Trump: Pro: strong business background, bold, tells it like it is Con: reality TV, some shady business ventures, haircut, less support from GOP, possible split convention Hillary: Pro: Clinton name, she's a female, less extreme, fully backed by her party (dems stick together) Con: Benghazi, emails, head injury, I put the odds at Hillary 80% Trump 20% and I don't care for either of them.
You forgot to add foreign policy experience to Hillary;s pro bracket. As for saying Trump tells like it is, doesn't Christie do that as well? With polls at where they are now, I would say its Hillary at 75%, Trump at 25%.
When you scurry away in November, you won't hear me laugh at you - - - Updated - - - Reagan was 37 percentage points behind Carter in March 1980
No, I wouldn't go that high. But you're also assuming Trump gets the nomination. These days, 55-45% is considered a landslide, but of course it comes down to delegates. But a 60-40% Clinton is entirely possible.
Unless there is a brokered convention, in other words the GOP steals the nomination, unfortunately it looks like Drumpf is getting the nomination.
I'll be here offering tissues to your bunch by the bale loads, it won't be enuf for the rivers that's a combined stat, Dumpy is overwhelmingly disdained by his own minority pity party
Probably. Up to 35% of Republicans indicate they will not vote for him. To be elected, that number has to be around 10%. In other words, 90% support. Ain't gonna happen. Additionally, demographics have changed even in the past few years. Fewer white males as a percentage to keep the Republican candidate, or at least the ones the GOP is providing, viable.
Professional oddsmakers are predicting Clinton, as are almost all political pollsters. The geniuses who nailed that stunning "Romney Landslide!" in '12 are calling it for The Great Flatu - in a shutout. , (Just shows what a Trump University diploma can do for you!)..........
A criminal who steals 40 million dollars from seven thousand students for a bogus university isn't going to the White House.
You a big Reagan fan? Trump's more like Teddy Roosevelt, but his support is as avid as Reagan's was in 1980, plus Reagan was also hated by the establishment in his party, and Trump and Reagan were both running against someone with no charisma, that no one really likes. Difference was, Carter was the president, and wasn't being investigated by the FBI - - - Updated - - - Karl Rove is melting down over Trump now.
Trump talks to sell the pitch, but doesn't go into the details, like what could go awry WITH the sales pitch. Especially with what happened in Brussels, it's easy for anyone to say "I'll ban Muslim's" when in actuality, even if its only temporary, you would not be able to keep millions of Muslims out of the country. One way or another, they'll find their way in, like ants. It's the same deal with the wall on the Mexican Border, a giant wall isn't going to put a stop to illegal immigration. It might sound good, but it might not actually BE good.
You still desperately clutching to that? Who isn't going to the White House is someone who compromised top secret information on a server kept in her bathroom, and is being investigated by the FBI.
No one is going to want some brute in the White House with some unstable, financial record like Trump's. Filing bankruptcy is no option when you're dealing with the national debt.
Reagan ran against someone who had an economy in the crapper and Iran hanging around his neck. Drumpf is no Ronnie Reagan. He is a snake oil salesman and that's giving the snake oil guy a bad rep.
