It is you spouting the bombast. There is nothing unusual about two bullets which hit completely different structures ending up in completely different condition. It is known that the bullet was a tumbler. This means it tumbled end over end after striking ANYthing. Striking kennedy's soft tissue would have caused no damage to the bullet but would have slowed it down drastically which is a fact you ignore. It also would have caused the bullet to tumble end over end which is why the back end was deeply caved in as that is the part which struck bones. The third shot did not strike soft tissue but immediately hit a dense hard skull which caused it to break apart and MOST of it was recovered. In addition all fragments were chemically proven to have come from Oswald's rifle exclusively. Once again that is found in the WC which you never read. The third bullet which is stupidly called magical was also chemically proven to have been fired from his rifle to the exclusion of any other. The claim that any of this is magical shows a lack of comprehension of firearms and ballistics. Bullets which SEEM to the novice movie watcher to be magical are the norm they routinely do things which seem impossible. BTW the wiki page you cited only shows two views a closer 360 degree view demonstrates the damage which is consistent and normal with the wounds it caused
The third shot did not strike soft tissue but immediately hit a dense hard skull which caused it to break apart and MOST of it was recovered. Full metal jacket bullets simply don't break apart when they his skull bone my friend. The skull is not a particularly thick bone And very little of it was recovered. But hey...give us a link and prove me wrong. Stop trying to sound like you know what you're talking about. You don't. - - - Updated - - - BTW the wiki page you cited only shows two views a closer 360 degree view demonstrates the damage which is consistent and normal with the wounds it caused What? The ONLY damage to that bullet was the slight flattening shown on the base. If you have some other magical "view"...please show it
Sometimes they do break apart this was simply one of those times and it is anthick dense bone. It was deeply caved in along the back end and yes it is on display in many places such as the Warren commission and the national archives it was also missing mass all of which is consistent with the injuries or caused.. Over fifty percent of the second bullet was recovered and matched to Oswald's rifle as was the third bullet. The evidence is clearly shown in the WC report which you never read.
So ten you must be able to point to some report that shows "over 50%" of the bullet. Please post a link. I won't hold my breath. And no...full metal jacketed bullets don't "sometimes break apart" when they hit skulls. And it is not "thick dense bone" . It's no thicker than rib bones (which you have told us don't damage bullets). The WC was a joke.
I did. The Warren commission report. Yes they do sometimes break apart and that is fact. Once again you show massive ignorance of ballistics. Many examples throughout the history of firearms prove you wrong. In addition you are now resorting to outright personal lies. I have never said any such thing about rib bones never damaging bullets and your attempt to lie in a personal sense further destroys your credibility.
The Warren commission report. Fine...what page? Once again you show massive ignorance of ballistics. Many examples throughout the history of firearms prove you wrong. great. Give us some examples then. Now you're calling me a lair? That's the next phase? Personal attacks? You saw the Magic Bullet. It broke numerous bones and was almost completely undamaged. But the same type of bullet disintegrated when it smashed through relatively thin skull bone?? It is you who have no credibility.
"Stop trying to sound like you know what you're talking about. You don't." thats what over a 100 people over the years have discovered coming on here before in the past have noticed,you are one of several hundreds of people that have noticed that over the years.
No there was never a magic bullet plain and simple. It was heavily damaged fact. It slowed down and tumbled before hitting none fact. Every time you try to spin you do so by ignoring knenor both of those facts. Many accounts exist of surgeons being forced to remove fragments OF BULLETS. - - - Updated - - - Actually they stop posting and run because they are proven wrong and you help do so as you are now
They probably stop posting because of your factless bullying. Here again is your "heavily damaged' bullet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-bullet_theory
I stated facts you ran from and that is not bullying I cited sources you ignore and never cite any. You accuse me of personal attacks I never made but you did lainchc your own by lying. Let's address that you stated I claimed bullets are never damaged when striking a rib quote me directly now.
I'm trying to make sense of that mess but .....well...you might want to stop spitting and drooling when you type. YOU claimed that the same type of bullet that disintegrated when it passed through relatively thin skull bone...passed through tissue,.,several layers of clothing and broke both a rib bone and wrist bones ended up nearly undamaged (because THAT is what that bullet looks like). That's ridiculous
they do because just like me,they got tired of taking him to school everyday just to watch him blatantly ignore facts and stoop to personal attacks out of desperation not being able to refute them.
http://spartacus-educational.com/JFKrydbergH.htm Law: Is there anything for the historical record that you would like people to know? Rydberg: For the historical record - it was one of the biggest cover-ups to enhance two people's futures: Johnson and Hoover. https://www.google.com/search?q=har...Up8IMKHbv5Bs4QsAQILw&biw=1280&bih=622#imgrc=_
After looking at this for several days I am satisfied that T3 is accurate based on several diagram comparisons. It also makes sense that Humes & Company told Dr. Burkley this location which is why he put it on JFK's death certificate. His neck was scrunched backward giving the appearance of being higher than it actually was, but even so, it can't be any higher than T2.
The kooks claimed T1 was fractured. Where's the proof? The give-away is the distance between T3 and where the neck meets the shoulder. It looks damn close to a match.
Gerald Ford forced to admit the Warren Report fictionalized The bullet hole is precisely in the upper back and could never be considered at the base of the neck without being wholly dishonest. It matches the hole in his shirt and suitcoat. A lie is never validated. When Gerald Ford and the WC changed the word, back to neck, they lied. When a person claims the bullet hole is on the neck they are lying. T1 could be considered (at least visually) at the base of the neck, but definitely not T3 or the bullet hole Jfk suffered to his upper back. The final report said: ''A bullet had entered the base of the back of his neck slightly to the right of the spine.'' ''My changes had nothing to do with a conspiracy theory,'' he said in a telephone interview from Beaver Creek, Colo. ''My changes were only an attempt to be more precise.'' Gerald full of crap Ford
What he made it...was completely contradictory...in order to "sorta" make the magic bullet theory seem plausible
