Trump Clinches Nomination!

What good does it do voting for the least worst candidate among the two major parties? You still end up with a very bad president. The lesser of two evils, you want to choose between the devil and satan or which poison you take, cyanide or arsenic? You'll end up dead with either. That is the choices the two major parties has given us.

Oh, I am sure the vast majority of those 24% who now state they won't vote or vote third party will end up holding their nose and voting for whom they consider the lesser of two evils, Trump or Clinton, only because one or the other will end up winning. Not me. I'll take the trillion to one shot. I'll vote for someone who in my opinion will be good for this country, not someone who will ruin it a bit less than the other. Such is life.

 

Oh there's no doubt in my mind progressives hate Trump, they're terrified they'll be forced to work, no offense!

 

lol Do you see robert byrd in that picture wearing his kkk grand dragon uniform? Does he look like hes 25 in that photo? lol Does hillary look like shes 3?



A photograph of Hillary Clinton being kissed by Senator Robert Byrd has been widely circulated as a political statement.

TRUE


and before you start crying about snopes.com, its financed by hillarys benefactor, George Soros.....

 

Again it was a settlement.

Wow you really plan to hammer home just how much you don't know huh?

"Convicted of bigotry"

 

You left-wingers should be ashamed of yourselves. Let's take a look at the "progressive" riff-raff running for the Democratic nomination:

1) A power-hungry Alinskyite who is currently the subject of a federal criminal probe and has already been found guilty of misconduct by the Inspector General at the U.S. Department of State

and

2) A senile old socialist coot that wants to turn America into Venezuela, much like the nihilistic imbecile in the White House who pledged to fundamentally transform the United States into a socialist (*)(*)(*)(*) hole

Embarrassing...

 

That's interesting. The job is an executive type job. One candidate had zero executive level experience (he never ran any sort of operation) and the other had decades, but because of 90 days in the Senate, one is credentialed with "political experience" and the other isn't. That does seem to be a millennial viewpoint; credentialing run amok.

 

Being a community organizer gives people experience, too, but that and 90 days in the Senate doesn't give a person the executive experience a person needs to be president and Obama has proven that, from the 4th worst economic record in American history to ObamaCare to helping turn Libya into Afghanistan on the Med.

And you have 8 years of unmitigated failure to show for Obama's lack of real world experience and utopian fantasies.

 

Trump clinches nomination, Hillary clinches butt cheeks!

- - - Updated - - -

To lefties bigotry is a federal offense as long as it is someone they do not agree with.

 

Let's look at this another way.

Would you get a guy with 90 days of experience as a plumber to build a fireplace in your house?

I know I wouldn't. I'd get a dude with years of experience as a brick mason to handle that job....

 

All supported facts. Documentation can be found in this thread.

 

Do you even read my posts? You are looking particularly silly again because you don't. I stated that the photo of Hillary greeting Byrd is true. What is not true and what is a fake photo is picture Byrd in the KKK outfit. It was created at strangecosmos.com and is a known fake photo. Robert Byrd left the KKK in '40's and publically disavowed them, apologized at least once a year for ever being a member and completely disavowed racism to the point that he commended by the NAACP.

Again a fake photo of Byrd in a KKK garb and a picture of Hillary greeting a colleague with a hug and a kiss on the cheek equates to being found guilty twice of racial discrimination? Again that is such a stretch you must be pulling something.

 

This is the peak for the delusional Trumpists.

He is certain to lose in the General, so they might as well celebrate now.

To the Trumpies:

Time to get to work on the post-Trump LOSS coping mechanism.

I wish you all the best as you come to grips with the INEVITABLE.

 

When I bump your posts in November, should I do them all at once, or as an ongoing series?



Don't worry, Gorn Captain and a few others will be there along with yours.



.

 

A settlement that included a judge ordering him to perform actions. You can spin it any way you want to but he settled because he knew the DOJ had him dead to rights. In the settlement he had to abide by court ordered review of the law, provide vacancy listings to a civil rights group and accept their qualified applicants. I realize you need to try to spin this to support your guy but really? If I get sued by neighbor because I shoot his dogs when they wander onto my property and the judge orders me not shoot the dogs and build a fence I am definitely guilty. I understand that this is inconvenient for Trump supporters but that does not make it true. He was guilty of racial discrimination not once but twice.

 

Care to comment on your nominee, since that's what this thread is about? Perhaps my expectations that a trump supporter could defend their candidate instead of attempting to deflect was too much.

 

She has too many die hards in her ranks including the media.
Trump will go after her, rightly so. And the media will spoon feed the nation that he is bullying a woman.

 

They are canadian so I'm not sure they will be available to you. Hopefully cause Canadian Brew is awesome.

I'll answer Tracker and yourself. It may BE about power because that is what it has been made into, but it's core ideal should always be about serving the people in the best manner possible. But losing site of that and focusing solely on dollars and cents means the central idea of Govt for the people (etc..) is corrupted. And I don't know of any politician who will fix that.

And this is why I don't like that Bernie calls himself a Socialist, because he isn't. He's a democratic Socialist, and I feel that everyone seems to gloss over that first word. He doesn't want to turn the US into Venezuela and has said so repeatedly. He is an advocate for social programs within a free market (well as free as the markets are these days) society.

I think he does have a chance, especially with almost every news story about Hillary being negative. I think once the primary is over a lot of the Sanders people will gravitate towards the Dem side simply out of partisanship. Or not vote (if they would have before hand, which I honestly wonder. Big crowds don't always equate to big votes)

 

Kokanee!!!!!

I LOVE THAT BEER. I was just in Vancouver for the 2nd time. First thing I did was go straight to the Two Parrots bar and get a tall one!

 

I'm not the one spinning this, you are. You claim, on multiple occasions in this thread, that Trump was convicted in a court of law. I'm the one who kept trying to tell you they settled, so now, after multiple posts, do you finally believe me, or are you still considering this settlement a conviction?

 

Again if a judge orders you to do something in civil court that you are not otherwise doing you are guilty period. If you violate an administrative law and you are fined and pay the fine the fine comes with an admission of guilt. For example if I am speeding and a cop gives me a speeding ticket and a notice to appear or a fine. If I choose not to appear and pay the fine that is an admission of guilt. In both circumstances this means Trump was found guilty of racial discrimination no matter how we keep wanting to deny it or spin it.

 

It is difficult to believe we actually have people here actually attempting to tell us he was "convicted" in a civil case.

 

It is hard to believe the lengths of which people will go to defend racist behavior. Tell me have you ever received a speeding ticket and paid a fine...that is an admission of guilt. If you go to court on a complaint filed by someone else (civil or criminal) and the judgement goes against you and you have to abide by a court ruling signed by a judge that means you are guilty of the underlying complaint. Unless of course you are a Trump supporter then anything he does is just explained away by ridiculous notions.

 

So you are going to repeat the same inaccurate nonsense over and over again?

 

She'd probably beat Trump in a landslide.

 

Not inaccurate. Completely true and completely proven. It is you and other Trump supporters that keep trying to spin this into something other that Trump being PROVEN GUILTY of racial discrimination not once but twice. Those are the facts, however inconvenient for you. You keep plugging your ears and saying I am not listening but that does not change the FACT that Trump was proven guilty of racial discrimination twice.