The leftwing mentality on display in San Jose

Immigration into the Union has not been a State's sovereign right, since 1808. It has never been an Individual responsibility.

It is a federal problem that should be resolved at our federal borders with the federal powers already delegated in Article 1, Section 8.

 

So you don't know that they were illegal immigrants or that the police forced Trump supporters through the protesters. And you based your OP on these fabrications.

Good job.

 

Yup. Which means Leftwing Regressives support Nulification.

Of course. When it comes to mowing their lawns, cleaning their homes and engaging in political violence, they rely on cheap immigrant labor in the Silicon Valley.

Shamefully. This idiot is beyond salvage and needs to resign. The name Sam Liccardo (Rhymes with Retardo) needs to be memorized as someone who we will work to defeat no matter what office he runs for or what position someone tries to appoint him to.

Look at the videos, this is what the Regressives want for America. This is what they have been working toward since the SBA kidnapped Patty Hearst and Bill Ayers was blowing up Federal bldgs. This is what Charles Manson was trying to ignite. They want a nation divided on racial lines, engaged in pitched street battles.

You had people of color, under foreign flags, running in packs and dragging down other folks based on their political beliefs.

For another look at the America Hillary and the Obama's envision:

Dems on FEC want to investigate political jokes

This is not a headline from The Onion. Two of three Democrats on the Federal Election Commission voted to investigate a joke told by GOP presidential candidate Mike Huckabee about asking contributors to give a milion dollars to his campaign.

Even though the investigation.... yes, they actually had an investigation... clearly reported that he was joking....

All three Republicans on the commission and the remaining Democrat voted against the investigation, killing the idea for the time being. Even Democratic staffers were amused by the idea, mocking the two members who wanted to investigate what was clearly a joke.

"We conclude that an objective listener would not reasonably have understood that Huckabee in fact solicited million-dollar contributions. Rather, he appeared, to be making a humorous aside in the course of his speech," said the just released staff report that recommended that a complaint against the former Arkansas governor be dismissed.

Yet two Democrats voted to enforce a "violation" that Huckabee was actively urging supporters to contribute more than the legal limits of $2,700.

So look at San Jose. Consider Hillary Clinton and think about what dealing with the IRS, EPA, DoJ, FEC, FCC – will be like if you hold beliefs and wish to express them, that are in opposition to the Administration's beliefs.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/06/dems_on_fec_want_to_investigate_political_jokes.html

 

Are you denying that Tr(oll)mp, and his supporters, made statements that incited violence?

 

The left sees Trumps energy and is panicking and lashing out. People are seeing leftist for the lawless thugs they are. Corruption is ok as long as your a Democrat so they justify and defend the rioters. This is why crooked Hillary is there leader.

 

Heavily armed Tea Partiers? The MSN and their Leftist followers were all over the Tea Party claiming they were violent, racist, and so on, yet they left the places they gathered cleaner than before they arrived.

The left wing violence that began in the 60's continues through BLM, OWS and now these anti Trump thugs who demonstrate their ignorance by claiming their violence is good for the country. This is truly "The Stupid Generation".

 

Actions aren't enough you need written documentation to prove that police weren't protecting citizens. In the videos they formed a line at the doors and walls... while blocking an entrance forcing Trump supporters through a crowd of rabid rioters. The only documentation I do have is the Mayor's support of Clinton and condemnation of Trump. The bias is clear... the actions provided show zero proactive protection. With no one being disciplined it doesn't leave any doubt that this is considered acceptable.

 

Heavily armed ? Were these tea partiers violent? I don't recall seing .

 

Yes, since protesters at a rally are by definition causing 'incitement'.

 

Nobody can recall seeing it because it never happened.

This is what we have come to expect from leftists. It may be frustrating but that's a consequence of the education system and the MSM of today.

 

Probably explains why mr. Trump keeps complaining about the msm .

 

Wasn't it Obama that claimed all gun owners were bitter bible thumpers or something to that effect?
Does that mean all gun owners should go on shooting sprees?
Do women wearing short dresses deserve rape?
I see no logic in projecting guilt from the perpetrator to the victim. Strange world you live in.

 

vs.

So which is it?

Do people have a fundamental right to assembly and free speech, or do the people need authoritarians like yourself deciding for everyone?

Why is Leftism always a mirror image of far-right fascism?

 

Yeah. When folks hear things they don't like, they are totally justified in chasing down innocent folks, who were no threat to them and beating them bloody. Keep in mind that this is YOUR claim.

 

Nope. The Tea Party folks were perfectly peaceful. The victims of the Leftwing Shocktroops in San Jose were perfectly peaceful. The expectation is that they will never start fighting back? And when they do, what then?

- - - Updated - - -

Political Violence ALWAYS comes from the Left.

- - - Updated - - -

Our racist piece of crap president has a new one: "They are in their cars, bars and VFW Halls listening to okie doke".

 

Wrong, the onus is the Mayor blaming the actions of these thugs on Trump's campaign. Especially, when the Mayor is running his city in violation of federal law.

Secondly, I have seen no proof that the attackers weren't illegals. Since Trump's Campaign has targeted illegals, it stand to reason that the attacker were illegal bent on disrupting a process that they do not have a voice in. Until I see proof positive that the attackers are legal citizens, I stand by my statements. BTW, a self serving statement to a report does not suffice.

 

I think San Jose will be the Aztlan capital some day when Mexico takes over more than 1/2 of SW America.

- - - Updated - - -

Yeah, one wonders why an American citizen would be protesting while carrying the Mexican flag.

 

Federal laws requires local law enforcement to turnover illegals arrested for a crime to be turned over to Federal Authorities to be deported. Therefore, it is a local responsibility to identify the transgressors to the Federal Authorities to deal with as required by Article 1, Sections 8 of the US Constitution. A Sanctuary city is one that is refusing to comply with federal statutes. As far as I know the Federal Statutes have not been overturned by the SCOTUS. (With the exception of Obama's attempt to circumvent the legislative process also required by the US Constitution.) So, San Jose's decision not comply with federal statute makes them the law breakers. Not the Trump Campaign.

Now, if you still have trouble with that concept, I can't help you.

 

I also don't know that they weren't illegals. I have already stated my reasoning to assume that they were.

Additionally, I am not the one claiming that the law enforcement forced Trump supporters to pass through the protesters.

 

How is being proud to be part of a philosophical tradition that fought fascists on the streets in any way opposed to free assembly and speech? I think people should be able to organize to advance political interests, I just think that when people start banding together to launch campaigns of violence against minorities that the masses ought to respond with the same violence against them.

 

Failure to answer the question twice is duly noted.

 

Ironic given what has happened INSIDE Tr(oll)mp rallies.

- - - Updated - - -

Failure to substantiate your baseless allegation is duly noted.

 

You're proud of attacking peaceful demonstrators and falsely conflate attending an event with a violent campaign against minorities.

It would help the discussion if you didn't spin reality and were internally consistent.

 

Did these people who were assaulted identify themselves as 'fascists' before they were set upon or were the cretins attacking them just hoping to get lucky?

 

What incident are you referring to?

If you're asking about the recent violence at Trump rallies, I have to say that I don't condone it, but I also empathize with the frustration and feelings of persecution driving it.

- - - Updated - - -

There's no such thing as a peaceful fascist. The fascist groups of the 1930s who I was referring to with that remark all engaged in violence against minorities from their inception.

I view modern day Trump supporters as only proto-fascists. They've yet to throw the first punch, so I don't think fighting them in the streets is necessary yet.