#BlackLivesMatter Take Responsibility for Dallas Attack

This is NOT going to help their cause. This is TERRORISM. Either the good eggs need to disavow BLM or be aligned with terrorists. No more messing around.

http://unitedmediapublishing.com/blacklivesmatter-takes-responsibility-for-dallas-attack/

 

#Blacklivesmatter inciting violence and racial divide since around 2014...

 

ok, this changes things.

if any BLM group has taken responsibility for the attack, the FBI needs to investigate and if the claim is true, arrest their leadership and membership and shut down that individual group.

if the larger BLM groups praise the attacks or take credit, then BLM is finished.

 

Gonna need another source. Any time I click a link and ads with half naked women populate the site, I kinda take what ever is presented and put it in the trash.

 

All media coverage of BLM needs to stop IMO. Coverage of groups like this, as though they're legitimate only adds to what we're seeing and getting.

 

Are people still going to wonder why people's trigger finger gets a little nervous when they encounter black people?

 

What makes that thinking different than someone going after cops for the actions of a few.

 

http://www.infowars.com/sick-black-lives-matter-supporters-celebrate-murder-of-dallas-cops/

Here's twitter accounts of BLM giving praise to the sniper attack. You can go on twitter too and see them with all the BLM hash tags. The black terrorist who committed this atrocity has probably inspired more of the BLM terrorists to follow suit. SCARY stuff.

 

BLM is finished. Society needs to condemn this hate group.

 

How are they finished? They are Obama's personal friends. He has them over to the White House.

 

which specific BLM group has taken credit?

where is their Tweet or Facebook post?

 

Just googled "black lives matter Assata Shakur" and the first result is the black lives matter website with a quote from Asatta Shakur.

That isn't a couple morons starting chants. That's the orginuzation openly supporting that person as an inspiration to its members.




Can you imagine if a group of people marched around chanting Bin Laden's propaganda and at the same protest 12 Americans were killed by members of that group? Then you go to their website and they are openly quoting him?

That's really bad. They should be classified as a terrorist organization and treated as such.

 

no, nothing has changed. the only difference is that the horrendous actions of this group have been shoved in your face so often and so blatantly that you can no longer apologize for this thuggish mob with a straight face. but we all know how this will play out. some "spokesman" for blm will come out and denounce these actions, actions that the group has already both overtly and covertly condoned, and all the good little drones will fall in lockstep (or should i say "goosestep") behind the party line. meanwhile, everyone who actually cares about the well-being of everyone will just shake their heads and buy a little more ammunition. those rounds may come in handy when little miss cankles is in the white house and the sh*t really hits the fan.

 

still waiting to hear which specific BLM group has praise this or taken responsibility

 

Quoting a lady who is responsible for the murder of 15 cops on your organizations website doesn't count?

That might not be "taking responsibility for what happened" but they certainly promoted and praised someone who's done it before.

Not "your" organization you twit.

Black Lives Matter's own website is praising a cop killer. And they chant at her rallies. And wear clothing supporting her. And preach her bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

It's on their own website!!!!

 

MY organization?

LOLOLOL!!!!!!!

silly

 

Thanks, Obama.

Race war on. Mission accomplished. Alinski proud.

 

The linked article mentions an encrypted chat session and an Atlanta radio show, but no transcripts or links to either of those sources was given.

The article showing "BLM twitter" is not BLM twitter, they are the twitter accounts of people whom the article identifies as "BLM supporters". If a supporter of something has an opinion, does that mean they speak for the entire organization? The people cheering these attacks are honest-to-god (*)(*)(*)(*)head losers, but it doesn't mean they speak for an entire group or movement.

 

in other words, no actual BLM group has praised the attacks or taken credit.

figures

 

`
`
Warning - This story cannot be confirmed.

 

It's a good question.
The only reference I can find looks kinda bogus. Something called BPPO?

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-08/black-power-political-organization-takes-responsibilty-murdering-5-dallas-cops
Ever heard of them?

 

The police chief said he wasn't affiliated with any organization

 

Lefties support BLM.

 

no sir

- - - Updated - - -

according to NRA logic, these guys were a Militia, not terrorists