I did not see that this site knew about the recent 3,000 word article, with the same title as that of this thread, published by Europhysics News. The article is available here http://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016474p21.pdf
I posted the article here on Aug 16: http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=458597&page=12&p=1066570864#post1066570864 I felt it belongs in the NIST 9/11 Scam thread because it does add information that exposes NIST. Thanks for your collaboration with the article Tony, it will be read and reviewed by a wide audience of your peers.
So far I have not read one post from you that says anything other than what the US government told you about 9/11, so why are you posting in this section of the forum? If you believe the US government told you the truth about 9/11 and it is the truth then the OCT should stand on its own merit and would not need you to parrot it or defend it. Additionally, you haven't cited anything in the article that contradicts any of it in any technical sense, your general personal opinion means nothing, I believe most regular readers are fully aware of your position.
Empty rhetoric doesn't make the crushing proof go away. 9/11 - The Truth In 5 Minutes - James Corbett https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgrunnLcG9Q http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=456423&p=1066183060#post1066183060
