Why did we naturally oppose homosexuality of 10,000,000 years?

And you believe Jesus was involved despite worshiping Thomas Jefferson?

 

You have any proof of that or are you gong to say that I'm afraid of something or show off the hight of your math skills?

Or the ultimate surrender, just not respond to me?

 

the liberal has no idea that 60 million slowly starved to death under libcommieism in China and that under Republican capitalism in China 40% of the entire planets poverty has been eliminated?

 

Corrected that for you.

 

what???????????????????

 

He does argue like a five year old.

- - - Updated - - -

Corrected that for you.

 

translation: as a typical liberal I lack the IQ for a substantive response

 

You're a liberal? Well I'm a conservative libertarian, perhaps that is why all you have is posturing.

Have you gotten to subtraction yet?

 

Of course as slavery was beginning to not be economically supportable and even when it was supportable it was a very very dangerous for the slaveholders. See what happen to the slaveholders and their families on the island of Haiti.

Next the slave trade between the west and Africa was stop by England in 1807.

France stop allowing slavery in it colonies in 1794 even those Napoleon reverse that for a time in 1802.

 

See folks? Look at my posts. That is how you outsmart someone like this.

 

Rome was not collapsing under Constantine.

Except they never did that. They are still a single-party state ruled by the Communist Party of China, their economy is still mixed, and worldwide poverty has not dropped by 40%.

 

You want to dictate how each person has sex?
You'll be very very busy.
Most have sex, most of the time, for pleasure.
And with 7B people in the world, procreation isn't a huge concern right now. Feeding them all is a bigger concern.

And being a racist is not a very nice thing to be either.

 

Yes. Why don't you? You believe in my way or the highway, based on this OP. And a racist OP it is.

- - - Updated - - -

Yes, we've evolved to the point we don't need sex for procreation. We can do it in test tubes. Do you believe in evolution?

 

A large percent of his slaves proven by modern DNA testing was his children by his dead wife half sister and Jefferson slave.

Given his very personal and emotional connections to some of his slaves his behavior toward his slaves need to be look at in that regard.





Who was talking about a draft that never saw the light of day?

 

So what is "proper sexual behavior"? Who decides what is proper? If you come back with the predictable God/Bible response, let me remind you that not everyone believes in the same thing. So unless you are suggesting that the majority gets to dictate the sexual behavior of everyone else based on a book of dubious origin, you need to have a different argument.

 

Bias born of ignorance. Also, the claim made in the thread title needs source citation.

Yet gays are not a threat to the survival of humanity.

What is the proper behavior, who gets to decide this and by what authority?

Yet we do not live in a conservative culture.

 

I wasn't expressing a personal opinion, I was merely pointing out the fact that in the ancient civilization homosexuality was considered a normal facet of life. This is depicted in both their art and their literature, including their religious literature. In fact, homosexuality wasn't broadly frowned upon until the middle ages. This isn't my opinion, you would fail your history exam if you tried applying what you saying here to your history class. You can see the ancient art and literature for yourself if you do not believe it (which again does not go as far back as 100,000 years, or 10,000,000 years)

As for the notion that the ancients' main priority was to reproduce to the point where homosexuality would be rejected.. that's an interesting notion, but if it were as a high priority as what you are indicating, then there would be no ancient priests or priestesses who commit themselves to a life of chastity (that is, the Romans would have no Vestal virgins, and the Greeks would have no priestesses of Athena)

 

Or 10,000,000 like the title suggests. Hell, our species ain't even that old...

 

Ted,

Your weapons grade stupidity makes me want to get kicked off this board and banned permanently so I will never make the mistake of coming back. It is multiplied by your pedantic mannerisms and your demagoguery.
Mods, please ban me.


"Y'know, Ted sez a big bush is a sign of a highly evolved intelligence."

 

Intellectually speaking the difference between all of you I'm responding to, is the difference between Vincent van Gogh and a wet paint roller falling down some stairs.

You are the former.

This is the latter

 

yes but you are liberal and so illiterate. OMG!!!No one is talking about if it was considered a normal facet???????????

http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/truth-about-sexuality-ancient-greece-and-rome261012/#gs.l7ul0No
Indeed if the Greeks and Romans did not outlaw it, it was because the shame of the act was punishment enough – though the weight of shame fell mostly on the penetrated.
Of greater taboo still was for an older man to allow himself to be penetrated by a younger man – the modern word "pathetic" derives from the Latin for such a man.
The only act considered more taboo was cunnilingus – to the Ancient’s minds as dangerously close to a man being penetrated by a woman as was possible.
Contrary to popular belief, anal sex for the Greeks and Romans was primarily a heterosexual act. There was no taboo on it occurring between men and women and it was the most reliable form of contraception available so would have been a regular part of the sex lives of any married couple.

 

yes but you are a liberal and so illiterate. HOw could you possibly know??

Fall of the Western Roman Empire -
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_of_the_Western_Roman_Empire
Wikipedia
The Fall of the Western Roman Empire was the process of decline in the Western Roman ... The reasons for the collapse are major subjects of the historiography of the ancient world and they .... and finally dissolved, by the partial institutions of Constantine; and the Roman world was overwhelmed by a deluge of Barbarians.

 

if you think conservatism is stupidity why so afraid to present your best example for the whole world to see?? What does your fear teach you?

 

dear, nothing could set special people apart more than the extreme abnormality of chastity. Now do you understand?

 

Actually proper procreation in Africa and India and in American ghettos would save 100's of millions, lives of pure dire misery. Do you get it now?