Surprise: A New Email Scandal Lie Emerges From Hillary Testimony.....

Hillary now has been caught in a couple more lies and now has perjured herself for the FOIA case in front of Judge Sullivan. This is good news. What say ye?




Now that the final debate is more fully in the rearview mirror, let's revisit the scandal Mrs. Clinton barely discussed in Las Vegas. She'll hide behind the "does not recall" obfuscations she offered to Judicial Watch under oath, but let's consider the context and the source: This is just another lie from a compulsive liar, lying about her national security-endangering email scandal for which nobody has been held accountable -- to the reported chagrin of the career FBI agents and DOJ lawyers who worked the case. Via the Washington Examiner, here we go again:

Responding to a set of questions under oath last week, Clinton said through her lawyer that she did not recall discussing her server with Bryan Pagliano, the IT aide whose immunity deal was the first to emerge publicly from the year-long FBI probe. "Secretary Clinton states that she does not recall having communications with Bryan Pagliano concerning or relating to the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of any emails in her clintonemail.com email account," Clinton testified through her lawyer, David Kendall, after raising objections to the question. But emails provided to conservative-leaning Judicial Watch through the Freedom of Information Act show Clinton included Pagliano in discussions about her Blackberry, iPad and server when her network experienced problems in 2012..."Let me take a look at the server to see if it offers any insight," Pagliano wrote in an email to Clinton after she complained to him and Cooper of the "troubles" plaguing her Blackberry. The new records were among the roughly 15,000 emails FBI agents turned over to the State Department at the conclusion of their investigation.

Beyond the smell test, these newly-released emails identify at least one instance in which Clinton personally emailed Pagliano, seeking assistance when her system was on the fritz (relatedly, you may remember that during a separate bout of server technical difficulties, the State Department actually disabled its official system's virtual defenses in order to try to accommodate her issue). Sec. Clinton reached out to Pagliano for help, and he replied that he was working on the issue. Does anyone believe this was the only time the two interacted? It's a safe bet that she can't recall that either. Meanwhile, experts are casting doubts on former State Department official Patrick Kennedy's tale about why he was in touch with an FBI official about email classifications, which he insists was not a quid pro quo offer:


Annie Linskey
✔ ‎@AnnieLinskey

HRC told the FBI she had no computers in the SCIF at her house. But they found that she did.....snip~

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2016/10/21/hillary-lie-pagliano-n2234731

 

1. It must be incredibly difficult for her to remember every lie she's told and who she told it to.

2. It will be even more difficult for her to blame this on Putin. No, make that impossible.

3. Pagliano needs to buy suicide insurance.

 

Whats Judicial Watch waiting for? File for the Perjury Charges now.

 

Evidently the Demos are quite worried about whats going to take place with this FOIA case. As Judge Sullivan has comedown on the State Dept and has said he will get to the bottom of Clintons Private server issue.

There isn't much the leftness can do now, that Hillary has perjured herself.

 

Yes, but then again you know how the Left operates. Soon the judge will discover -- oh so very many -- reasons WHY a Hillary Clinton lie under oath is actually a bright and shiny sunbeam of love. Hence the judge or the judge's family members continue to . . . live.

Of course it need not be THAT heavy-handed. Consider the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States of America. Clearly the Left has got SOMETHING on Roberts else he would not every once in a while come down with a very clearly unconstitutional ruling on leftist do-or-die issues that MUST go the Left's way. A juicy bit of blackmail goes a very long way.

 

She would look really stupid removing 5 Judges from the Bench. She does have 5 of them that are seeing thru her BS. Now they just need to act.

There is no point in waiting. She nad her Team have made the FBI look like goofballs. She has shown no respect for the Law, and these Judges would have to know that after the election. They will be made to look incompetent.

 

Well said.

 

Judicial Watch should file for the Perjury charges now. Let that top the Headlines in the News. Hillary to be Charged for Perjury.

Who cares if it sets the leftness off and they want to riot and whatnot.

 

Hillary can't remember anything that's politically embarrassing or legally damaging. Her memory is fine. She's just done so much illegal (*)(*)(*)(*) she literally can't remember it all. No one can.

Don't worry...Obama's "Justice" Department is going to spring into action any minute now and deal with her epic corruption......... .

 

Not now.....after finding an email from BO peep himself.

 

Oh, hogwash! What we have is a few more unsubstantiated claims against Hilary. Unfortunately, as Republicans and Mother Putin become more desperate, we can expect many more of these in the coming days and remaining 2 weeks before the election. They will probably even grow in number and in absurdity. Before this election is over I wouldn't be surprised if Russia releases emails "proving" Hilary is ineligible to become POTUS because she was born on Mars. And you know what, I'm sure Republicans would believe it.

But that's kind of the problem for Republicans; the Republican base will believe anything their leaders and the Russians tell them. This kind of crap appeals to the Republican base, but it doesn't have an appeal outside the Republican base. The world outside the Republican base isn't as dumb as the Republican leadership and the Russians need them to be. This kind of crap has little to no appeal outside the Republican base.

 

Try again.....and show us a link that Assange of WikiLeaks has become Republican. Or let it stand as a highlight of your intelligence.

 

Did Russians also force Clinton to lie under oath about the extent of her dealings with Bryan Pagliano, the guy who created the at home email server that Hillary used in place of her State Department model, against all government regulations and protocols?

You guys are losing your minds trying to defend the criminal behavior of Madame Clinton. A smart person wouldn't even try.
A smart person would look at the rising mountain of evidence against Clinton and conclude there is too much dirt there to bury or sweep away.

But who ever said defenders of epic corruption and venality were smart?

 

Cmon now.....you know the marble players avoided the Podesta thread and Hillary's Kremlin Connection. They don't even care that Podesta is helping Putin and his boys get around BO peeps sanctions.

The left has bailed out on BO peep.

Btw did someone else get up the 3rd Veritas video already? If not.....then its the usual avoidance factor by Team leftness again.

 

LOL...another Clinton charged with perjury...I love the sound of it, but I'm not so sure they can prove she "didn't remember" at the time she made that claim. She's over 60, so her legal team can use the "Dementia defense"...especially in her case.

 

Try again...? Why should I show you a link that Assange or for that matter Wikileaks has become Republican? I never said or even intimated that..oops. You see, that's one of the problems which vexes the Republican Party. Their ideology has become divorced from reality. Republican zealots cannot seen the truth even when it's right in front of their noses in black and white.

Once again for your edification, I said the information being "leaked" by Wikileaks is sourced from Russian state hackers and therefore shouldn't be mindlessly accepted as truth unless and until it can be collaborated. Little if any of the information released thus far has been corroborated.

It's widely known that Trump has a deep seated admiration for Putin, and is easily manipulated by Putin. Trump changed the Republican Party platform to take a more Russian friendly stance towards Russia. Trump wants to weaken NATO, which would favor Putin and his dreams of Russian expansion. It's also known Trump and Putin share a common set of values. They both oppose freedom of speech and freedom of the press. Trump has created a blacklist of individuals and press agencies who are then excluded from his press events. You don't have to listen to trump long before you hear him complain about the press. He calls the press corrupt, among other things, and he has absolutely no evidence to back any of his assertions up. Both Trump and Putin are authoritarians. Trump even called for his buddy, Putin, to hack into American servers and release the information they find. There's a word for that, it's called sabotage.

Putin likes Trump, and he is trying to throw the US elections. That's why his intelligence agencies has hacked into Democratic Party servers and is releasing that information through Assange and his Wikileaks. Assange was once, and probably still is, an employee of the Russian state. Assange was employed by Russian state owned and controlled television.

Because Assange is willfully acting as a Russian agent, and because Russia is trying to advantage Trump with these Wikileaks releases, anything they release shouldn't be treated as truthful until properly validated. There is a reason Russia is releasing these materials in the days just before the election. By dumping overwhelming numbers of documents, tens of thousands of documents, just before the election, there is no time to corroborate the materials. That's kind of the whole point of releasing these materials just before the election. This is the strategy Russia has used with other countries. This is Russian misinformation.

 

Well you see, despite your best efforts and those of your Republican cohorts, the US isn't yet a banana republic. In the US you need evidence to accuse someone, and you have no evidence of any of the crimes you allege. For nearly 3 decades Republicans have wrongly accused Hilary Clinton of everything from simple malfeasance to serial murder and despite of nearly 3 decades of investigations and tens of millions of dollars of public funds spent, 3 special prosecutors, numerous congressional investigations, and an FBI investigation, Republicans have found not an iota of evidence to support your assertions.

Unfortunately for you and your Republican cohorts, you need evidence and you have none.

 

And people wonder if people come here to do nothing but push talking points... "Republicans" nor "Putin/Russia" have nothing to do with the topic.

 

None except for the clear lie under oath that Hillary told about her association with Bryan Pagliano. Doesn't that count in your mind?

 

So, according to you and those of your mindset, only something put out by the dems should be believed without question and anything else should just be dismissed out of hand? You have a moral and ethical problem on your hands if this is the case.

 

But democrats don't need evidence to blame and accuse anyone else who disagrees with them of criminal behavior?

Remember, for many who crossed Clinton it was a death sentence.

 

This changes NOTHING.

Those Hitlary supporters that CAN follow this are of the 'by any means necessary' type. They are all in. No crime sways them. Raytri is a PERFECT example. He can rationalize and excuse ANYTHING.

Then there are the 'GIMME!' Hitlary supporters. They cannot/will not understand any of this. Gimme. More. Now!

 

And you think that makes any kind of sense....seriously? Facts are facts, and fact are our friends. The fact is Putin is trying to get Trump elected for all the aforementioned reasons and one of the ways he is doing that is by hacking into Democratic servers, modifying, taking out of context, and misrepresenting the those materials.

And reader of those materials released by Russia should bear that in mind. If Putin wanted to release them months ago, he could have. But then that would have allowed for proper vetting of those documents. But he didn't, and there is a reason why he didn't. Now you may not want to recognize it, but that doesn't change the truth here.

 

Your post didnt make sense? No kidding. No its not factual the Putin/Trump connection the DNC is pushing non stop.. What was "taken out of context or misepresenting" and provide your information showing Putin and Wikileaks are connected.. Hint you can not.

 

None, means none, no exceptions. Hilary has endured nearly 30 years of wrongful accusations by Republicans and Republicans have spent tens of millions of public dollars and unknown sums of private dollars, 3 special prosecutors, numerous congressional investigations, and FBI investigation of Hilary with absolutely no evidence of criminal wrong doing to show for it. Unfortunately for you and your Republican cohorts, that matters.

Unfortunately for Republicans they haven't yet reduced the state to a banana republic. The Constitution still means something.