This recent round of attacks against Hillary concerns FBI Director Comey's statements about finding more emails. It has been made clear by the New York Post that these emails did not come from Hillary or any of her devices. However, this hasn't stopped radicalized Republicans from calling her "corrupt" and "dangerous". But this is inconsistent with the facts. Hillary's emails have been completely harmless. No harm was found from her emails or her server. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/10/28/us/politics/fbi-letter.html?_r=1®ister=google Comey needs to announce that the emails are unrelated to Hillary and apologize for this deliberate smear against Hillary at this crucial point in the election.
I have never seen a campaign like this before.. I can't tell if Trump is a willful liar or he's delusional.. I suspect the later when you combine his lies with his paranoia and tweets, grabbing women and demeaning them.. Its reached a level of depravity that I have never seen. The Republican party is fractured.
Comey is doing this as a diversion for Hillary Clinton's benefit, nothing else. Just a cheap media stunt to prevent any discussion of issues. Clinton loses on issues. - - - Updated - - - The traditional Democratic Party is gone, replaced with the neocon globalist Corporate Fascist Party.
Lame. Your own NY Times link clearly implicates Hillary in these new emails and clearly states that they are directly related to the prematurely closed (and now reopened) investigation of Hillary's classified emails and private servers.
The Democrats are going to be fine.. Women are not threatening to sue Trump. Trump is threatening to sue the women.. and you couldn't figure that out for yourself. In fact, Trump has threatened 28 lawsuits since he announced his run.. He has a sickness.. and no amount of attacks on Hillary can cover that up.
It confirms the emails are directly related to the investigation of Hillary's classified emails. It mentions nothing else.
No, the article says it's unrelated. - - - Updated - - - Nixon was a criminal. Hillary is not. Obviously
There is more evidence against Hillary than any human being ever convicted of a crime. Her above the law ride has come to an end. I guess the lesson learned here is never to (*)(*)(*)(*) off the FBI. She bought comey but she didn't have enough to buy the rest of the good men and women there who devote their lives and put their lives on the line to put people like Hillary away. Enjoy.....Hillary is scuuuuuuuuuurooooohed.
Comey who has reopened his investigation is the basis for your opinion. That is a tough sell for handing over a life jacket. Let me simplify it for you--if they are reopening the investigation then there is a high probability that some of the emails found either were not disclosed when they were not about yoga and Chelsea's wedding or they are proof that some of the emails that were provided had been altered. Either way, 10 days is a short ramp to a very big cliff for Inmate Clinton.
Oh, so you've seen the Emails? What's in them? Or are you just belching out giant flumes of hot air as usual?
Well, the FBI has seen the emails and have considered them viable enough to update/prioritize the investigation. That's really all we know right now. And it doesn't look good for Hillary. Even if there is no 'smoking gun' in those emails, her prior testimony and comments clearly show her to be a liar. Once one lies, no one with any objectivity will believe them. This is a lose/lose for Hillary...sorry.
I'm not going to go that far yet, am extremely cynical of the integrity of Comey's FBI. Bought cops generally stay bought. Will just wait to see what is in them, hope I'm wrong, that the investigation is honest and not some Democrat election stunt.
Patriotic Americans can now celebrate! The country is saved and Donald Trump will be president! [video=youtube;iPUmE-tne5U]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPUmE-tne5U[/video]
Several weeks ago, I bet Comey was your Home-Boy... maybe he's finally doing his job. Poor guy can't win.
It's a distinct possibility that emails were found that HRC & her team had erased from her servers, yet remained here.
Gowdy gets Comey to say Clintons past statements not true Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) began his questioning of Comey with a series of inquiries pertaining to the accuracy of the former secretary of states testimony before the Benghazi committee last October and other public statements. To Clintons assertion that she never sent or received information marked classified on her private email, Comey pointed to the investigations findings to the contrary. "That's not true. There were a small number of portion markings on I think three of the documents, Comey said. (The State Department on Wednesday said that two of those documents were inadvertently marked.) On Clintons statement that she did not email classified material to anyone, Comey responded, There was classified email. Secretary Clinton said she used just one device. Was that true? Gowdy asked, to which Comey answered, She used multiple devices during the four years of her term as secretary of state. Asked about Clintons claim that all work-related emails were returned to State, Comey said that was not true. As far as Clintons statement that neither she nor anyone else deleted work-related emails from her personal account, Comey said that was a harder one to answer, as investigators found traces of work-related emails on devices or in slack space, whether they were deleted or on a server that was changed out or something else happened to them. "Secretary Clinton said her lawyers read every one of the emails and were overly inclusive. Did her lawyers read the email content individually?" Gowdy asked. Comey responded, "No." http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/james-comey-testimony-clinton-email-225224#ixzz4ORI6VDvl