LIBERAL Chicago Tribune calls for Hillary to "STEP DOWN"!

When a liberal propaganda organ like the Chicago Tribune is calling for Hillary to step aside.........the Fat Lady has sung.

Joe Biden is also collapsing and has just said he could work with Donald Trump.


"John Kass writes at the Chicago Tribune that in the face of the FBI reopening an investigation into the emails of Hillary Clinton while she was Secretary of State, it is time for her to “step down” as the Democratic Presidential nominee."

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi...ribune-time-democrats-ask-clinton-step-aside/

 

Little late for her to step down. Kaine wouldn't qualify to get on the ballot in any state in America, maybe they could try to bring back Bernie, but since he sold out like a (*)(*)(*)(*)(*), don't see him getting many votes...

 

Maybe not.........

"Chicago: 119 Dead People Voted — 229 Times!"

 

Another fever dream from conservatives. Get back with us in 12 days or so.

 

I doubt the Chicago Tribune is......"conservative". But tell yourself whatever it takes.

"Ten Days that Shook the World" is a heck of a book.
And the title aptly describes now until election day.

 

Fever dream? No, that was the last year in which liberals really thought all of Clinton's and Obama's corruption wouldn't catch up with them...

 

Outside of the few who plan on spending the next 8 years (at PF) railing against President Hillary--I wonder how many of them are even going to be here.

It will be a humbling experience, for the anti-Hillary echo chamber, after a year of parroting Fever Swamp delusions.

 

Playing hard doesn't mean that you don't know how to cope with loss.

 

Step down, forget that . LOCK HER UP ...

- - - Updated - - -

LOCK HER UP ....... LOCK HER UP...

- - - Updated - - -

LOCK HER UP....... LOCK HER UP.....

 

Well at least your consistent in your support of the crazy woman, can't really defend any of this

Sad thing is she might still win, the polls having the popular vote even is NOT the electoral college and it's still in her favor, so let's see if this October surprise snowball turns into an avalanche that's what's needed

 

lock her up....... Lock her up.....

 

Many of us have been here for many years. Political debate is a hobby for most of us. While some smash drones on Call of Duty, others smash drones on PF.

 

If she wins she most likely stole it anyway, she does have a history of rigging elections

 

Projecting much? For someone who is so sure Hillary will win I doubt you will be around if she does not. This race is too close to call yet you are sure Hillary has it in the bag. It is sad to see people so unsure and scared that they have to bolster their nerves by constantly posting "Hillary will win". LOL!

 

Of course, Brightfart failed to note that John Kass is to the Trib what Charles Krauthammer is to the Washington Post, their far right wing spokesman.

Instead, the captive trash blog of the Trump campaign falsely portrays this as the Chicago Trubune's editorial policy, and the bobble heads all nod.

 

I will be here. Hillary is going to win. No sweat.

Do you plan on spending the next 8 years at PF hammering President Hillary and trolling "Lefties"?

Sounds like a really efficient use of time in your pursuit of the American Dream. Best of luck.

Oh, btw--Have I mentioned that Hillary's VICTORY is engraved in stone?

 

Chicago: 119 Dead People Voted — 229 Times!

by Katie McHugh

 

Non sequiter

Trying to derail your own thread after you got caught falsely claiming that this was the Trib's editorial position?

 

According to Brietbart? I wouldn't believe him ever.. Post something directly from the Chicago Trib.

- - - Updated - - -

Man, these liars are just pathetic.

 

Well, no. If Hillary drops out, the DNC might stick Biden in. The nightmare is that more people would vote for him than Hillary. TOUGH IT OUT, HILLARY!

 

LOLOLOL.. Prove it...

 

The Trib isn't liberal.....but they do have to cater to a Liberal market. This year they endorsed Johnson. They usually endorse Repubs.

Plus now they have Bought out the Chicago Sun Times and the LA. Times. So you will be seeing quite a few liberals being sent to the ranks of the unemployment lines.

 

Now another professor and 2 Economic models that haven't been wrong for a very long time are saying Trump will win. Nate Silver wishes he could be as good as any of them.

After Trump becomes president......Promise us you wont run out and hurt yourself or commit Suicide.



Professor who’s predicted 30 years of presidential elections correctly is doubling down on a Trump win.....

Allan J. Lichtman, distinguished professor of history at American University, said Democrats would not be able to hold on to the White House.

So plenty has changed. But one thing hasn't: Lichtman, author of “Predicting the Next President: The Keys to the White House 2016,” is sticking with his prediction of a Trump victory.

If you aren't familiar with his somewhat unique prediction system, here are the basics: The keys to the White House, he says, are a set of 13 true/false statements. If six of them are false, the incumbent party loses the presidency. His system has correctly predicted the winner of the popular vote in every U.S. presidential election since 1984. Our first interview went into the keys more in-depth, and in September he said the keys were settled enough to make an official prediction of a Democratic loss and a Trump win.

THE FIX: Readers can learn a lot about the keys from the previous interviews we’ve done, but let’s remind people of the quick version: Your system for predicting the outcome of the election stays away from polls, electoral college maps and candidates’ histories in favor of a more broad historical evaluation.

A lot of people would look at the events of the last month — the Access Hollywood tape obtained by The Washington Post, the presidential debates and the shifts in polling — and say, this has got to effect the keys somehow.

Donald Trump’s severe and unprecedented problems bragging about sexual assault and then having ten or more women coming out and saying, “Yes, that’s exactly what you did” — this is without precedent. But it didn’t change a key.

Your critics might say that if Secretary Clinton wins the election, or somehow the keys shift and the prediction changes, then what was the point of a prediction in the first place? Is it possible you’ll have to reevaluate the keys if they don’t turn out to be right this time?

I do think this election has the potential to shatter the normal boundaries of American politics and reset everything, including, perhaps, reset the keys to the White House. Look, I’m not a psychic. I don’t look at a crystal ball. The keys are based on history. And they’re based on a lot of changes in history, they’re very robust. But there can come a time when change is so cataclysmic that it changes the fundamentals of how we do our politics, and this election has the potential — we don’t know yet, but it has the potential......snip~

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...n-a-trump-win/

 

It's been proven but Clintoncrats just don't care, it's part of why they love her

 

Can you imagine what the msm would be doing if it was the Republican nominee under investigation by the FBI?

Most of the msm is covering for Hillary. Hopefully more decent journalists do what this guy did.