Wikileaks BOMBSHELL Exposes Extent Of Clinton Corruption

Since the day of the Season 1 premiere I've said that Madam Secretary is a Clinton propaganda. Not in the sense that she paid for it (although I wouldn't be surprised), but it's just so (*)(*)(*)(*)ing obviously about her. A favorable presentation of her, just as The West Wing was a favorable presentation of Bill.

Surprisingly, both are actually half decent shows. I don't mind it on in the background.

 

Hillary Clinton committed treason. Her judgement wasn't based on what was beneficial for her country... only on her pocketbook:

 

[video=youtube;b4vHSiotAFA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4vHSiotAFA[/video]

Quite healthy input from another view on Clinton/Trump.

That is basically as I see it

 

Europeans are not able to fully understand the US, since they can only relate it to their own countries which have a completely different history and background.. Trump is not a fascist, since it doesn't really exist in the US. He is an isolationist that wants the US to butt out of world affairs and take care of itself. This of course is good for everyone whether they realize it or not... I mean just look at the chaos we created in the Middle East, Ukraine and everywhere else with the CIA and Soros' regime changes.

As for these white supremacists, they are very few. Most Latinos are against the illegals coming in since they are wrecking havoc in places like Southern California. ..and most blacks know their situation has worsened with Obama. There are more blacks being killed each day in Chicago than before Obama became president.

What Trump wants to do is help America prosper by creating jobs for everyone. In order to do that he has to get American corporations to move back, and also to remove many of the regulations that the Democrats have put in and have strangled small businesses so that they can grow and hire more workers.

He also wants to stop the lobbying in Washington for foreign governments. It is these lobbyists that have us supporting criminals and governments like Saudi Arabia which commit genocide and are supporting terrorists in places like Syria.

 

Another WikiLeaks special.


WikiLeaks: Clinton Staffer Wanted to Make Sure All of Her Emails Were Not Being Released....

An email exchange from the latest batch of leaked John Podesta emails adds further documentation of intent and consciousness of guilt on the part of Team Clinton regarding her improper, homebrew email set-up.

Two days after the New York Times broke the EmailGate story, members of the Clinton campaign were emailing back and forth about how best to release the 55,000 emails Clinton had given the State Department (after her advisers had reviewed tens of thousands of emails in her possession and decided which ones to turn over).

Jim Margolis, Clinton's media adviser, wrote back, "Yes." Then he added tellingly, "If there is a release of the 55K, are there others that are not being released?"

Joel Benenson, the chief strategist for the Clinton campaign, wrote back, "Definitely.".....snip~

https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/1...f-her-emails-were-not-being-released/?ref=yfp

 

Speaking of emails, has anyone heard about the latest wikileaks info? Apparently John Podesta has some strange tastes when it comes to cooking. You must google "podesta spirit cooking." Just when you thought things could not get any crazier, this stuff comes out. (Learn about it on an empty stomach.)

 

The Clintons have left more dead behind them than Capone did

 

about 13% of the Clinton Foundation funding went in any way to help people. The remianing 87% was spent on travel, overhead, fund raising, etc. Go look at their financial statements. That's been in the news for a year, get up to speed.

The Clinton Foundation is a scam, everyone knows it, even Chelsea who apparently has an honest streak actually tried to clean it up but was trounced and thrown out. That was in the news and several OP's here. Get up to speed.

 

Please stop your madness. You are reduced to claiming bribery (that is what "pay to play" is, just ask the Russians how they got the State Dept to sign off on their uranium deal) is a good thing because you don't accept any of the bad results. Your stubbornness in supporting Hilary has pushed you down the rabbit hole. Hilary is a crook, her entire entourage is filled with crooks. Everyone knows it. Return to sanity.

 

As an FBI agent tipping off a person under criminal investigation, Kadzik should be charged with obstruction of justice. This would serve as a lesson to everyone in the FBI, DOJ and any other law enforcement agency using their position for political purposes.

 

With the FBI claiming at least 5 foreign governments hacked Clinton's emails and even Democrats claiming the Russians did for her using an unsecure server, it is 100% possible if not certain that the attackers in Libya killing our Ambassador and 3 others was facilitated by their knowing of the SIX HUNDRED emails from Ambassador Stevens begging for security and advising there was none - meaning the attackers knew our Ambassador was fully vulnerable.

- - - Updated - - -

Ritual cannibalism and satanic rituals. This is who Clinton has in charge of her entire political apparatus.

Her #1 aid divulged massive amounts of national security secrets.

 

Politics is bribery. Where were your tears when we were sold out again and again to the drug companies by all of Congress? If accepting bribery as usual is the cost of not having somebody as incompetent and unstable as Trump in office is insanity, I embrace it.

 

You do not understand how charity works. 13% is the figure for GRANTS. Grants are given to other charities to do work. Charities like The Clinton Foundation perform charitable work directly. Travel and salaries are expenses required to do overseas charity. We can talk about whether their expenses are excessive, but 13% is an outright lie.

 

Bill Clinton is probably one of the most highly paid speakers in the world today and for a very good reason, he knows what he is talking about.

So anyone making a large donation to the foundation probably makes it contingent upon having Bill come and speak at one event or another. And yes, Bill is entitled to his fees since that is how he earns his living.

This is not any different to how plenty of other polticians earn their livings while they are not in office.

And, as you correctly noted, the Clinton Foundation itself has been ranked highly for the charitable work that it does around the world.

These bogus attempts to conflate his speeches with Hillary and the CF is nothing more than political mudslinging because there is nothing illegal going on. There is no "pay to play" because making donations and giving speeches are perfectly legal and above board.

Pay to play means purchasing political favors so that your corporation will get a lucrative government contract. No one has made any allegations proving that to be the case.

 

Guilt by association all that you can come up with?

The CF made the charitable donation but beyond that they were not responsible for what was actually done with the funds.

 

Heres the mistake you're making, you believe people on the left are like you and operate within moral boundaries - they dont! The end goal is all that matters to them. For example - if they truly believe in diversity why arent they pushing for more Republican teachers, journalists and speakers? The answer is obvious, they dont. Its all about pushing a narrative to achieve the same old end goal, international socialism.

 

The Hillary Clinton Takeover of the United States

[video=youtube;ov5kvWSz5LM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ov5kvWSz5LM&t=0s[/video]

Veteran intelligence said a quiet coup d'état in the US

 

She has a big problem though.... I am listening to CNN in the background here and
Smerconish is saying that FBI agents are willing to take great risks to
leak details to the press....... in order to stop the Hillary takeover.

 

True, but the big donors to the Clinton Foundation who were awarded the contracts were responsible. Companies like InnoVida Holdings, LLC.

http://www.haiti-liberte.com/archives/volume4-48/After%20Quake.asp

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2016/08/hillary-state-dept-helped-jailed-clinton-foundation-donor-get-10-mil-u-s-failed-haiti-project/

Purely coincidental I'm sure

 

Now the State Dept confirms that the Clinton Foundation didn't inform then of a 1 Million dollar donation from Qatar. Of course the Clinton Foundation now themselves after the fact confirms the act.


Clinton's charity confirms Qatar's $1 million gift while she was at State Dept.....


The Clinton Foundation has confirmed it accepted a $1 million gift from Qatar while Hillary Clinton was U.S. secretary of state without informing the State Department, even though she had promised to let the agency review new or significantly increased support from foreign governments.

Qatari officials pledged the money in 2011 to mark the 65th birthday of Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton's husband, and sought to meet the former U.S. president in person the following year to present him the check, according to an email from a foundation official to Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign chairman, John Podesta. The email, among thousands hacked from Podesta's account, was published last month by WikiLeaks.

Clinton signed an ethics agreement governing her family's globe-straddling foundation in order to become secretary of state in 2009. The agreement was designed to increase transparency to avoid appearances that U.S. foreign policy could be swayed by wealthy donors.

If a new foreign government wished to donate or if an existing foreign-government donor, such as Qatar, wanted to "increase materially" its support of ongoing programs, Clinton promised that the State Department's ethics official would be notified and given a chance to raise any concerns.

Clinton Foundation officials last month declined to confirm the Qatar donation. In response to additional questions, a foundation spokesman, Brian Cookstra, this week said that it accepted the $1 million gift from Qatar, but this did not amount to a "material increase" in the Gulf country's support for the charity. Cookstra declined to say whether Qatari officials received their requested meeting with Bill Clinton.

Officials at Qatar's embassy in Washington and in its Council of Ministers in the capital, Doha, declined to discuss the donation.

The State Department has said it has no record of the foundation submitting the Qatar gift for review, and that it was incumbent on the foundation to notify the department about donations that needed attention. A department spokeswoman did not respond to additional questions about the donation.....snip~

https://www.yahoo.com/news/clintons-charity-confirms-qatars-1-million-gift-while-001205827.html

 

Bill Clinton used the charity as a vehicle for making profits. Watch the video.

 

That fallaciously assumes that the Clintons were aware of his background but where is the actual evidence that they knew about it?

Same thing applies to the shyster Trump. They Clintons knew him too but they were probably unaware of all of the scams he was running. How many GOP politicians associated with Trump without knowing what a scumbag he was?

Guilt by association means squat unless you have hard evidence proving that they knew.

 

Bill and Melinda Gates and also George W. Bush are partners in the Clinton Foundation. Ask them about it.

 

Wrong. I looked at the foundation financial statements, they are on their web site. https://www.clintonfoundation.org/about/annual-financial-reports

87% of their funding went to overhead, travel, salaries, fund raising, rent, office expenses, etc. That means at most 13% went to actual charitable work.

Compare that to a group like Feed The Children ($459 Million in 2015), an international charity run by a former politician (JC Watts), their overhead/travel/fundraising/rent/etc is 9%. The remaining 91% went directly to provide care for people in need - food, medical care, building sanitation facilities, clean water. That's from their audited financial report.

So compare:
Clinton Foundation, $440 Million in 2014, at most 13% of funding to direct services.
Feed the Children, $459 Million in 2015, 91% of funding to direct services.

The Clinton Foundation is a joke and a scam. You should be ashamed of yourself for defending it.

 

Well thank you very much. You finally just came out and admitted why you support "progressives" - you have their morals. Anything to win, anything to impose your agenda, bribery, corruption, lies, whatever.

At least you are being honest about your attitude.