Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

Hard Evidence

Discussion in '9/11' started by Shinebox, Sep 10, 2016.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

Page 6 of 6
  1. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    63

    That link is full of hard evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.

    thats the UNDERSTATEMENT of the century.the game of chess is over with and with you doing all the checkmating.:thumbsup::clapping:
     
    9/11 was an inside job, Nov 16, 2016
    #126
  2. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    63
    indeed,the only one who did a dodge is the OP ignoring you took him to school with your first reply to this thread.hee hee.
     
    9/11 was an inside job, Nov 16, 2016
    #127
  3. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The guy asks for Hard Evidence about 9/11 and when I produce the Hard Evidence (which has been here well before he started this thread), he claims it's a "dodge". You can't make this **** up.
     
    Bob0627, Nov 16, 2016
    #128
  4. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    3,484
    Likes Received:
    1,508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You can certainly make (*)(*)(*)(*) up though ... any evidence of explosives yet Bobb?? ...
     
    Shinebox, Nov 16, 2016
    #129
  5. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you actually read through the thread, you would know I'm not NIST and have nothing to do with them so I didn't make anything up, the entire thread is based on NIST's own published EVIDENCE.

    There's nothing in the thread about explosives other than the fact that NIST did not investigate for that by their own admission. And that admission plus the fact that NIST did not investigate for explosives is HARD EVIDENCE, exactly what you asked for but claim it's a "dodge".
     
    Bob0627, Nov 16, 2016
    #130
Page 6 of 6

Share This Page