Must have been an inside job

Discussion in '9/11' started by cjnewson88, Jan 19, 2017.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Iran: 'More than 20 firefighters dead' in Tehran building collapse

    http://edition.cnn.com/2017/01/19/middleeast/iran-tehran-building-fire-collapse/index.html

    Video here:

    [video=youtube;sPGr4D1-zDI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPGr4D1-zDI[/video]

    At the 35 second mark you can see and hear the internal building fail as the floors collapse near the top. Gravity does the rest. Straight down into its own footprint. Fire in steal framed buildings, and this one was being constant fought by firefighters too.

    So truthers, what excuse are you going to pull out of your backside to explain this one away?
     
  2. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    No response? I guess the resident truthers here are too busy scurrying over the internet looking through conspiracy forums and youtube videos to tell them how to think.
     
  3. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You forgot this one:

    [video=youtube;8XMTALBYRNA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XMTALBYRNA[/video]
     
  4. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    3,473
    Likes Received:
    1,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    you don't see the offsets in that building? ... do you know what expansion joints are and how they separate structural building assemblies? ...

    not relevant to the OP ...
     
  5. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ... or 9/11, true.
     
  6. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    3,473
    Likes Received:
    1,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    then why did you post that video? ...
     
  7. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because it's part of the OP. The author wants to make a case for the fact that steel frame buildings can collapse to some extent due to fire and it's certainly possible, it happened before with the Windsor Tower in Spain. In this case though there's already skepticism that fire may have been the sole cause.

    http://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...tects--engineers-for-911-truth-300394148.html

    None of these buildings (which were not skyscrapers) have anything to do with happened to the 3 towers on 9/11 though or are even representative of those building destructions, as the OP obviously tries to suggest, for many reasons.
     
  8. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    3,473
    Likes Received:
    1,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yet you like to claim an unprecedented act and say it's impossible yet refute any evidence to the contrary with a simple wave of the hand ... how convenient ...

    just pull up some physical evidence of CD Bob and I will sign off here for good ...
     
  9. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't "like" to claim anything, the evidence speaks for itself.

    CD is not an unprecedented act.

    It is impossible that 3 steel framed skyscrapers can come down in the manner they did from fire, planes, damage or a combination. There is no evidence to the contrary, never mind actual proof. It's more than obvious all 3 were CD'd.

    The evidence (a ton of it is readily available in this section of the forum) speaks for itself, I don't need to pull it up for you, you can sign off for good now. I don't care about you, your mentality, or whether you sign off or not, none of that has nothing to do with 9/11, ditto with this entire thread. You can grovel to the OCT all day long every day or try to make every 9/11 discussion about me, it changes nothing.
     
  10. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    3,473
    Likes Received:
    1,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    weak response ... you are deluded ... obvious? ..

    ready to answer any questions yet? ...
     
  11. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    3,473
    Likes Received:
    1,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    still waiting for evidence of CD ...
     
  12. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Talk about weak and deluded, back to making it about me as predicted. It still doesn't change anything about 9/11 Shiner, but keep trying to make 9/11 about me.

    "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, and expecting a different result." - Albert Einstein

    Are you ready to ask any questions about the OCT? Oh you don't have any and that's not part of your hobby, I forgot.

    - - - Updated - - -

    http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/

    I hope that helps. You're welcome.
     
  13. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    22,694
    Likes Received:
    11,760
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How different that collapse looked compared to the towers. This one a true collapse by gravity, as nothing was blown out the sides, not a free fall collapse, and a fairly unsymmetrical collapse.

    Compared to the towers which were very close to free fall, complete and symmetrical, with much debris blown out sideways.

    Thank you Mr. Senior Instructor, for a good comparison of two different collapses. One gravity driven and natural, the other employing controlled demolition.
     
  14. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
  15. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Did you watch the video with your eyes shut?

    WTC7 especially, started collapsing internally, which progressed through the building, until finally the outer shell collapsed, just like the Plasco building.

    It proves the canard that truthers have been crying for years that fire cannot bring down steal framed high rise buildings.
     
  16. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Bob, if you look 'closely' at that building it was demolished using thermate cutters LOL
     
  17. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
  18. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There's no comparison to the 3 WTC towers even if it did come down by fire alone. It has nothing to do with and doesn't make the OCT true.
     
  19. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    true, these guys would implode their dog house and try to spin to support the OCT version of 911 LOL
     
  20. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    22,694
    Likes Received:
    11,760
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No Senior Instructor, it demonstrated just what Architects & Engineers have demonstrated for years--the towers (and 7) were brought down by some form of controlled demolition.

    The controlled demolition at WTC blew debris outwards fairly symmetrically. This event in Iran was a natural collapse, not a CD, and no material was blown out sideways.

    I for one am thankful to the OP for providing this footage as a "compare and contrast" opportunity for posters, regarding the different events. Clearly the Iran event was a natural collapse, and just as AE911 Truth has been saying, clearly the WTC events were controlled demolition.
     
  21. Llewellyn Moss

    Llewellyn Moss Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2016
    Messages:
    1,572
    Likes Received:
    681
    Trophy Points:
    113
    [video=youtube;XXCu_YmJZx8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXCu_YmJZx8[/video]
     
  22. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    3,473
    Likes Received:
    1,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    well ... that was different ... and interesting ...
     
  23. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,601
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Responding to people who argue with their stereotype of what they believe truthers think is a total waste of time. The Iran building is 1/10 the height of a Twin Tower and less than a 1/3rd of WTC7. AE911Truth is just showing how idiotic they are by bringing it up.

    Comparing the Mandarin Hotel to WTC7 makes more sense.

    psik
     
  24. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    3,473
    Likes Received:
    1,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    truthers are funny ... now they are smarter than the people they prop up as experts ... comedy gold ...
     
  25. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    True, it seems a few posters here have their personal demons to fight or it's part of their "hobby", as the case may be.

    I don't believe it's "idiotic" because you never know if there's something significant to be discovered and even possibly relative to 9/11 in some manner (such as if it really was a CD after all). It is also allegedly the collapse of a steel frame building strictly due to fire and that would be an extremely rare phenomenon if it turns out to be true. They are right that such knowledge would be important to an architect. However, it is far from a priority with respect to 9/11 since they've already concluded that this wasn't the case for any of the 3 towers.

    They've already done that.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Speaking of stereotypes, demons and hobbies .....
     

Share This Page