Read the official publications for yourself, especially the recently declassified 28 pages. Whether you agree the document(s) strongly suggest Saudi involvement or not is your personal belief system and not my concern, many however do agree (see thread title).
In your opinion Bob, not according to longknife. Do you have a reading comprehension issue? Read the post below. Show me where the OP is questioning the Saudi's involvement. Sorry, but you are disagreeing. longknife made a statement in the subject that the "Saudi Officials Supported 9/11 Terrorists" and then posted his feelings why. To longknife, there is no question and you disagree with him because you think it's unverified. I can't believe I have to explain this stuff to you.
Sorry it's an unverified claim no matter what longknife believes. I don't "think" it's unverified, I know it is. I can believe you're trying to be a contrarian because we disagree vehemently on the OCT. I don't need your "explanations", they are useless to me and more importantly, dishonest and intellectually insulting.
so now it's "Saudi involvement" but not "Saudi royal family" involvement ... moving the goalposts again Bob? ... I think we all know that Saudi involvement was there ...
Great nitpicking catch Shiner, I meant Saudi royal family or government (which is the same thing). I didn't say NOT Saudi royal family did I? You added that phoniness. The Saudi royal family are Saudis, right? Does that help your hobby for today?
don't need all the links again Scott ... you stated that the flash and mysterious pods at impact are proof that their were no hijackers ... but thanks for all the copy/pasta ...
I'd better link to this info so that nobody is confused. http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/what-truthers-believe.532027/page-31#post-1069864990
I better link to your quote so that nobody is confused. Pay particular attention to the part of the quote I put in red.
