Satellite images show before, after US strikes on Syrian base

CNN provides good photos in the link.

There is only one question about that. Where in the list of the destroyed targets is a chemical weapon storage?

 

Excellent question, First.

 

NOWHERE!!!

Because we intentionally did not hit the chemicals!!

Stupid question..

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-airbase-chemical-weapons-idlib-a7672126.html

the United States military had specifically sought to avoid hitting what it believes is a facility containing more sarin gas at the airfield.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/06/...responses-to-syrian-chemical-attack.html?_r=0

 

Nice point, but something disturbs me.
The US accuses Syria of using chemical weapons and launches missiles on its airbase but "intentionally did not hit the chemicals"? Sounds like delirium. At least they could point at this specific facility which contains chemical weapon. Why they didn't do that?
In 1998 the USA found some chemical weapon facility in Sudan and hit this facility.

Nothing prevented the USA from hitting exactly that facility where they thought the cheamical weapon was. What changed now?

 

The statement was "so the USA cannot be blamed for any chemical leaks that could be harmful to the population" or something similar..

You should have been watching FOX live instead of whatever you were watching because you seem to have missed a lot of facts..

 

So, the USA is so moral that they can't afford any opportunity of leak of chemical weapon? But they launched 59 cruise missiles on the airfield where they say the chemical weapons is being kept. Every missile brings about 450 kilos of explosive. Fifty nine missiles on just one airfield - every one with almost half-tons of explosive - aiming on bunkers, storages and so on. Don't you see some controvercy here? It doesn't look like they were over-worried about possible leak, does it? What if Syrians would move their chemical weapon from one bunker to another one and the US missile would hit that bunker? Then what? Sorry, but such an explanation looks unreal. 59 missiles on one airfield doesn't look like some kind of careful behaviour.

 

Good intel..
Obviously we hit it and managed to not hit the chemicals..

 

This strike was shockingly pointless and ignorant and typical wag the dog. The US is supporting extensive civilian deaths in Yemen right now. Diverting your attention from the fact that Trump is handing over the government to billionaires.

 

But again it's strange. Your intel is very good in Shayrat airfield, but very bad in other places.
In Mosul it's very-very bad. Just two weeks ago the US airstrikes killed hundreds of people:

So, the US intel is very good in Shayrat and is very bad in Mosul and in Raqqa. Why? Do you have any explanation?

 

For it to be satellite imagery, requires there first to be such a thing as satellites. There is not one single image or video feed of satellite here. It's all either a hand held camera, or drone footage. Like the non-existence of a chemical weapon storage, same tactic with "satellites", they don't exist.

 

So long as you believe whatever your told from politicians. I tend to think they are the most compulsive liars in the world and in human history. But hey, I didn't graduate high school.

 

Trump is about the only one left that you can believe..

Yeah, jump on it and call him a liar and whatever else but he is one of the only ones will balls enough to tell it like it is..
Trump is always a "liar" until the truth comes out..

 

I think you are kidding but not sure.

Here is one easy Trump lie. He claims he cares about Syrian children, while he supports the Saudis who are murdering Yemeni children. HMMM

 

I'm sure he cares about all children..

Do you support the Israelis that kill Palestinian children or the Palestinians who kill Israeli children?

 

I pray for Trump, and I thought the same way about him as well. But Hillary is not in jail, Benghazi and the families that lost their loved ones have still gone unjustified, the IRS scandal nothing happening there they don't even bring it up anymore, Fast and Furious another gun run gone bad, nothing there either. In one of Trumps rallies, he mentioned re-opening the 9/11 investigation, or looking at it closely to see if indeed it needs re-opened. I can't even find that rally now, but I watched it live on tv with friends and family, and we all thought it was a very good idea, simply because the condition the world has gone since 9/11, and all the controversies thereof.

What is it that Trump has changed, that actually shows change?

And again, I pray for Trump, that God keeps him safe and that he holds strong to the truth no matter where it takes him, and no matter the consequences. Truth should not be classified, evil and wrong doing is what is classified.

 

Really man, that is a terrible piece of political correctness. It takes a certain heart to be king. And as king, you must find the good out of all the bad. Wars happen, that does not mean one does not care of the innocents within the nation they are at war with. Just another example of how it takes a certain heart to be king. Sounds to me like you could never be king, for you would refuse to go to war with someone that wants war with you, all because you don't want to look like you don't care about their innocent children. The consequence, it doesn't matter if one wants a war or not, when the war comes knocking at your door.

 

I remember the rallies you speak of..
For one he just can't accomplish everything at once, things will take time, especially with virtually everyone fighting him on every last point..

Trump has got a good SCOTUS judge through, undone many obama EAs such as the lead ban and stopped a lot of economy killing EPA overreach, took a good shot at repealing obamacare but it just isn't time yet, got some of the greatest cabinet members and appointments possible, putting work into getting the wall done and making mexico pay for it, etc.. More accomplishments will come in time..

Ofcourse some things he said in campaigning like lock her up and looking into 9/11 may not come to fruition, but seriously he is putting a hell of an effort into getting things done that he said he would, much more than other presidents..

 

I would agree with you there, you make a strong point. However, 9/11 changed the course of the worlds future (especially "our rights" laws) and history, pretty important to get that one right, and expose those who were involved if indeed it was an inside job (I strongly believe it was). I mean do you understand how it is dire to know the "truth". The Syrian war could have derived from the 9/11 event, things were put in place to get us where we are now. This should take priority over a wall or healthcare. To make America great again, is going to require a lot of work, and investigations, to determine what has put us on this path (what the truth is). The evil that has come into American leaders and politicians, must be exposed, and must take top priority. And we need to bring back the constitution in a very strong way. Otherwise, America will never be great again, how can it, when the "idea" of America (constitution) is already gone. The constitution is not upheld, nor is it protected, it's being erased.

 

Your sure? But he is actively killing them? Right now!

I support both the dead Israeli children and the dead Palestinian children. Of course. But unlike Trump or Obama, I dont actively help kill any of them.

 

Political correctness? What are you saying you psycho.

He is openly supporting the Saudis with a **** ton of weapons while the Saudis deliberately are trying to starve entire population centers in Yemen.

BTW, cut the **** with your praying. It doesn't do anything and frankly is a mental illness.

 

I think that if 9/11 was found to be any sort of inside job it would have sch far reaching consequences as to tear this country right down to the ground just as the buildings fell..

We did lose a lot of privacy because of it but we are in this new information age..
I do not think for one second that any laws are going to stop our NSA/CIA from using any digital surveillance they want regardless of what is or is not legal..
It's all a matter of how interested and motivated the are to find out what..

 

Libs didn't give a $#!^ when Barry blew up hospitals and CNN did everything they could to either not talk about it at all or go on about how he never harmed a civilian. Collateral damage happens but seems Barry gets a pass and Trump will be called every name in the book. Libs pfft

 

Maybe some. I just criticized Obama for murdering civilians. Collarteral damage isn't happening in Yemen. There, the Saudis are delibrately trying to starve population centers. The US is actively, and has, actively been suporrting it. Including sending the Saudis cluster bombs designed to kill civilians.

The US is the most violent nation on Earth no matter who is in power. Playing the Lib/repub game is pathetic, pointless and shows a complete misunderstanding of American politics.

For example, many of the same rich people who supported Obama and Clinton, also donate to Trump and other repubs.

The problem with you people is you read your MSNBC or you read your right wing crap, and you play right into their hands.

For 30 years, this country has handed over public wealth to private power, and they will continue to do so under Trump and already have.

 

And you say I don't get it lol.

 

Technology is no reason to infiltrate the privacy of Americans.