Well, Trump does it again! Spills classified information to foreign head of state.

You've been refuted multiple times already.
You have no credibility. So long. Complete waste of time. Won't feed the trolling.

 

You posted at meme as though it is supposed to mean something. David Horowitz is a former liberal who is highly credible and does great damage to you and yours. So you attack, as you've been programmed by Saul Alinsky to do.

Keep whining, liberal. Your act is moldy.

 

Trump was the guy who said Hillary couldn't be trusted. Sure, Trump technically has legal power to tell the world our nation's secrets, but is it really something you want? If Obama had done this, you know you'd be angry.

 

Trump told no one anything of any use. Clinton, however, did.

Stop making silly claims.

 

I never thought we'd be having a national debate over whether or not it's acceptable for a president to tell foreign leaders state secrets. It's NOT OKAY.

 

Trump gave the Russian ambassadors Israeli intelligence and the Phillippines military intelligence.

 

I guess I would have expected the debate to start when Clinton did it 20 years ago.

I guess it depends upon the information. I, for one, find far more about which to be upset when I heard that Clinton gave the Chinese 20 years of missile and other technology than when I hear that Trump explained that there are two US Nuclear subs somewhere in a 14,000 square mile area.

You?

 

1999:
"China has been stealing America's most sensitive nuclear secrets "for at least the past several decades"
http://edition.cnn.com/US/9905/25/cox.report.02/

1993:
" Israel has sold advanced military technology to China for more than a decade and is
moving to expand its cooperation with Beijing, says R. James Woolsey, the Director of Central Intelligence."
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/13/world/israel-sells-arms-to-china-us-says.html

2013
"A top Israeli defense official was forced to step down last week, according to Maariv Sunday, after the United States expressed fury at Israel's decision to sell military equipment to China."
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/175404

 

Is this what you whine about?

Clinton Defends China Satellite Waiver
White House delivers papers to Congress in support of the deal
WASHINGTON (May 22) -- President Bill Clinton on Friday defended a controversial satellite deal with China, even as White House officials delivered documents to the House International Relations Committee about the arrangement.

The president said the deal to launch U.S. satellites on rockets owned by other nations was "correct" and "based on what I thought was in the national interest and supportive of our national security."
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/22/china.money/

 

Your utterly bogus extremist alt right allegation about Clinton was debunked.

Not at all surprising that you cannot deal with the facts and engage in civil discourse regarding the reality of what Trump is doing to harm the USA now.

 

Twenty years ago, Hillary gave the Chinese twenty years' worth of classified military knowledge?

Well, if that's true, then two wrongs don't make a right. Trump isn't vindicated by Hillary's wrongdoings.

 

let's have the forum Republicans demonstrate integrity by demanding that this happen right away - bet I've got a long wait for that to happen ....

 

Hillary?

You don't even care to understand the topic.

 

Don't be daft. At least read why this was a controversy, from a source that you can't complain about - as weak as they themselves describe it.

http://www.nytimes.com/1999/05/11/world/clinton-approves-technology-transfer-to-china.html

The actions of Democrats, assisted by their willing accomplices in the media, can be paper thin for the leftist base. They're willing to look the other way on anything. What really was at stake was described here:

http://eagleforum.org/psr/1998/june98/psrjune98.html

The Dem corruption machine was in place even then, however. Nothing came of it.

 

Hillary cancelled the deal with the US arms dealer Turi. I don't think Turi has any credibility.

The CIA people at the Annex were all Ivy League guys with expertise in communications.. or computers.. Analysts and Translators. They weren't soldiers. The mission was to identify Eastern Militias that had fought against Gaddafi in an effort to reinstate the Idris Constitution.

 

He did so it. Even made the name of a station chief public.

 

You mean the station chief in Tripoli? Everyone knew who he was .. and then he went public. The guy was a slob and a poor manager. Nobody liked him.

 

So that was reason enough to out him publicly?

 

It was a matter of public record...

Oh you are talking about "Bob" in Benghazi not the station chief in Tripoli.. Bob in Benghazi said there was no stand down order.

“There never was a stand-down order,” said the base chief known as Bob, speaking publicly for the first time. “At no time did I ever second-guess that the team would depart.”

[Fact-checking the Bengha
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...bb4dd403c7d_story.html?utm_term=.c28526ddcc7a

 

The CIA station chief is never public record. He's always listed as some type.of minor embassy officer.

 

Horowitz is a hack.. a sh*tstirrer.

 

He defeated Hillary Clinton in an election. EVERYTHING he does is 'wrong'. Fortunately liberals appear to be so intellectually and morally bankrupt the only platform they have is to hate on Trump...

 

John Brennen was station chief in Riyahd when the Khobar Towers were bombed... Public knowledge.

Did someone tell you that Obama had outed the station chief?

 

Trump's been in office 4 months.. Is Hillary controlling Trump?

 

You folks are whining about Trump with the same energy now as the day he beat Clinton. You have no other platform, and every national election since Nov has gone against liberals. Say whatever you want about Trump, but liberal problems run much deeper...