ACT for America to Stage Marches Against ‘Sharia Law’ Nationwide

These squirrely claims about Dearborn have been debunked over and over again. I have friends who live in Dearborn. You should be ashamed for peddling such crap.

 

This Trump fellow has certainly been a boon to participatory democracy as so many are now speaking truth to power.

 

Because YOU say so?
Have you heard of the Catholic Tribunal or Biet Din?

 

You won't believe the mental gymnastics these so-called champions of liberal ideas, do to defend this religion. It always comes back to, "but but but Christianity".
Of course, believing marriage is between a man, and woman is on par with ISIS throwing homosexuals off a tall building.(I don't give a crap about religion, or if gays get married)

You don't believe in killing unborn children, some how you're no better than third world knuckle draggers who stone women for adultery(Afghanistan), whip women for driving cars(Saudi Arabia), and throw young women in prison for being gang rapped(Pakistan).

Don't wanna bake a cake for a gay wedding, it's a crime against humanity. Here's where it's homosexuality is punishable by death, or a prison sentence.

Notice a correlation?

Don't buy into the bullshit militant feminist spew, well you're a woman hating cave dweller.
Then these same morons call you "racist"(Islam is a religion, and leftist are that ****ing stupid), and defend Muslims, sharia, and their Stone Age religion.

 

Who Madonna?

 

Because Muslims have been known to completely assimilate everywhere they go.

 

Of the few nutters mincing and howling about the prospect of a theocratic legal code being imposed upon Americans, Christian Canon Law is a far more likely candidate than is Jewish Talmudic Law or Islamic Sharia Law, but none is remotely credible.

Their panic is more sensibly directed at those invading Martians in Grover's Mill.

 

Do they also teach the proper use of the ellipsis? It seems we have some posters here who also need to take that class.

 

Unlike the Christians.


HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH!

 

Why would anyone be graciously accepting of Donald Trump? This man is a sociopath and a compulsive liar.

 

Actually, it's a fine.

And long before there's a fine, there is a notice to comply.

And if you ignore the notice to comply, and if you refuse to comply with STATE LAW, then
there are repercussions.

Over here in the USA.

PS: Homosexual acts were illegal in the USA during many of our lifetimes, including those
sexual acts that most human beings practice . . . if they are lucky . . . if not daily and there
are no headaches . . . at least weekly.

 

Conservatives support radical christianity only because both are anti America above all else.

 

HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH!


Gosh . . . except for about a thousand years when they were running the show
around Europe starting in 400 AD.

 

Ya, this actually headed to the Supreme Court, looking forward to watching you people cry over baked goods.

 

Name one Christian dominated country on the planet that has less rights for women or gays against any Muslim dominated country.

Go ahead, I'm challenging you to put the worst Christian dominated nation vs the best Muslim one.

This is where your argument falls apart as it always does.

 

The only way a bakery can discriminate is to sell memberships to their customers.

We went thru this crap in the 1960s over Woolworth lunch counters.

 

Look at me! I refuse to talk about the subject of the thread.

 

We aren't the ones defending sharia law. That would be your side.

 

If it's not the Sharia thing, then it's the terrorist thing. I'll just drop this here for now.

 

What a load of crap and if you wipe your butt as good as you know history you are in trouble. The issue was influence not taking over......when it came to having a Catholic Prez.

 

I have no idea what "argument" you are fantasizing about.

Neither Christian Canon Law, nor Islamic Sharia Law, nor Jewish Talmudic Law is about to be enacted anywhere in the US.

Are all Abrahamic religions sexist in varying degrees and acutely so at various periods of their respective histories? Of course.

I'm pleased that many Christian-majority nations have made impressive progress recently, and hope others will follow their lead.

 

Then read it again, slowly.

The question is very simple. The rest of your statement is deflection.

 

"Islamists" - those who hate and have no respect for individual rights and freedoms, who want to force their religious beliefs on others through physical violence (Law) should not have been let into the country to begin with.

The main principle on which this nation was founded "individual rights and freedoms ABOVE the legitimate authority of Gov't" is based on respect for individual rights and freedoms.

Why on earth would we let people into this country who hate the main principle on which this nation was founded ... or put up with them trying to establish their hateful and sick ideology into law in this country ??

 

How does your sick ideology judge that of others which doesn't comply with it?

 

I'm not the one who brought it up.

And the SCOTUS has ducked another cake case 14 times.

You can start holding your breath now if you like.

I'd love SCOTUS to look at it.