Trump warns North Korea threats 'will be met with fire and fury'<<MOD WARNING>>

and will be again, so is Trump setting us up for war?

 

What? You forget about Bills nuke deal with NK?



.

 

yes, trump is dealing in gross hyperbole in the face of millions of human lives, that we can agree on, will this push us to war, time will tell, next Trump wll say, who knew, this was so complicated

gotta love the Trump supporters, if your not with our desire for full out war with fire and furry the likes the world has never seen, your against us, sounds like Bush and his if your not with us your against us nonsense

Trump is easily manipulate by his ego, as is Kim, I do no think this will turn out pretty

 

Which "liberals" would that be? Care to name one?

[/quote]But Bill clinton and obama did the most to further the north korean and iranian nuclear missle programs[/QUOTE]

I would say it was China supported by American corporate dollars.

 

I was not talking to you. I said good day sir.

 

Wow.

Why would you just lie like that?

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-fire-and-fury.511679/page-12#post-1067847623

You -- responding to Fresh Air. ^

 

Why do liberals always make the mistake taking everything literal when language is more often an intuitive expression.

 

I thought the right kept telling us Trump says it like it is, now your saying we should not take him literaly

by the way, sounds like NK already crossed Trumps red line, that did not take long, now what?

 

Only liberals are here attacking trump for trying to protect America from north korean nuclear missles

If you pay attention they drop hints about nuclear weapons being a deterrent against US aggression

 

Clinton gave nukes to No. Korea?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_North_Korean_nuclear_program

 

You... are not fresh air.
I SAID GOOD DAY!

 

I wonder what result liberals are hoping for here?

A victory for kim?

 

nope, just looking for our President not to over-react like Bush did in Iraq

 

Of course I'm not, but why would you blatantly lie about the fact you *did* directly respond to Fresh Air?

Then say
'Ctrl said: ↑
I was not talking to you. I said good day sir."

??

 

Wasn't it Trump that said No. Korea should be allowed to have nukes?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...onald-trump-thinks-so/?utm_term=.bb06ab08f467

Wasn't it Trump that admired Kim Jong Un?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...ng-un-north-korea-war-interview-a7706766.html

Not sure where you see these "hints" at save in the alt reality created by Trump

 

no were attacking Trump for creating a red line saying we will respond to simple threats with fire and fury the likes the world has never seen, but I guess your ok with that

 

Since no wmd's or direct threat to the US by Saddam that is a fair request

But the threat from north korea is real

 

And you wonder why no one takes you anti-Trumpers seriously?

TRUMP’S “FIRE AND FURY” REMARK IS PROOF HE’S A MADMAN, BUT BILL CLINTON SAID IF THE NORKS USED AN ATOMIC WEAPON “It would mean the end of their country as they know it.” And that was firm, manly presidential talk

https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/272356/

 

is it to the level of a response of fire and fury the likes the world has never seen before for simple threats from a crazy child dictator like kim that has made threats for almost all his life, what happens now when kim crosses the line once more... red lines are dangerous when made like this, wasn't good when Obama did it and now Trump doing it

 

The right has this thing called intuition which allows us to have an intuitive understanding of what he says with the need for detailed explanation.
In this case, even less detail can be given because it would ruin the element of surprise. It would be best if the statement can insinuate the use of atomic weapons to keep NK on its toes and to push China into action in de-elevating the situation. Otherwise China is unlikely to act. Although there is room for such an interpretation, it isn't what he will do but don't tell anyone because we need the enemy and its neighbors to believe Trump will turn that key and push that red button.

 

his polls were not tanking when he said those things and Russiagate was not closing in on him

 

No it wasnt

Trump said it might be ok for south korea, japan or saudi arabia to aquire nuclear weapons

You obviously didn't read your own reference

"Mr Trump went on to clarify that he was not praising the North Korean leader.

"I'm not giving him credit or not giving him credit; I'm just saying that's a very hard thing to do," Mr Trump said. "As to whether or not he's rational, I have no opinion on it. I hope he's rational."

 

those that support kim probably say the same things about the crazy things kim says

 

You were attacking trump long before today

Besides trump did not say exactly when kim can expect a response from the US

Trump has to battle the north koreans and liberals in his own country at the same time

 

yes, Trump said one thing and then when called on it changed his stance, that happens a lot with Trump, do you think Trump will enforce his new red line? threatening to bring fire and fury the like the world has never seen before if nk makes any more threats against us, if Trump does, would you support it?