Why is everyone so opposed to white nationalism?

Not to me you didn't. I answered your question. You won't answer mine. Noted.

 

I give myself a pass when it comes to f**king nazi. My path has crossed their several times in the past and it's not a pleasant memory.

Oh, and keep working on the name for your white utopia - ViKKKtoryville? New Nazi Town? So many possibilities.

 

What is wrong with all of these?

 

You are very difficult to complement.

 

I've said several times that "white America" would look a lot like the state you live in, which is one of the whitest in the entire country. Why is that so hard to understand?

 

I didn't say it was your argument. I didn't post that to you.

No idea what liberals have to do with my post to another poster, or your OP.

What is "White America"?

 

So White America looks exactly as New Hampshire does today. White people and minorities co-existing in peace, low unemployment, low crime, no problems. Got it.

 

Thank you for admitting that you are not consistent at all in your anti-racist efforts and that you give racist minorities a pass. Very progressive of you.

 

My source is black so why bother when I know you will reject him out of hand.

 

No, unlike liberals I don't reject facts. Please post it.

 

"White people and minorities co-existing in peace" is not a very accurate analysis of your state. New Hampshire is 93% non-Hispanic white, compared to the country overall, which is only 62% white. Only 1.1% of New Hampshire is black, 1.6% Hispanic, compared to 13% and 19%, respectively. It's not too surprising that "low unemployment, low crime, and no problems" is the situation in New Hampshire. And that's why people like me want there to be a white nation. Homogenous societies simply work better than "diverse" societies like the ones you fawn over, yet live nowhere near.

 

He said he wanted breitbart news to be a "platform for the alt right"

Source:

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/08/stephen-bannon-donald-trump-alt-right-breitbart-news/

Yeah.

There is nothing in the heading of the article that uses the word "force."

 

So you are a victim? That also fits the profile...

 

Who cares? Anglo indian women are waymoreatractive than white babes (who probably arent white anyway)

 

Typical. I called you out, and you cant give a source. Another lie.

 

You think that sympathizing with some Nazi ideas makes me a Nazi who wants to killsixmillionjews?

David Lane was a WN, not a neo-Nazi.

 

I live here. Post some links to some white versus minority crimes we have going on. Race riots. Lootings. Burnings. All of that. I'll wait.

And say what "White America" is. Do you disallow all minorities, or do you keep some around as tokens?

 

Do you always accuse people of posting "idiotic comments" when you cannot answer their question? Sounds to me like you could not answer a very straightforward, innocuous question and you are now lashing out.

I will repeat the gist of what I said for the benefit of the sane people reading this thread: David Lane is a Neo Nazi. He uttered the 14 words. Therefore, Questerr thinks that the 14-words must be Neo Nazi, too (never mind the fact only people can be Neo Nazi, however this is how Questerr's mind works). I just want to point out this is a very stupid thing to say. The character/political conviction/reputation of someone does not always have a direct bearing on the value or veracity of what he says. We should evaluate a statement based on its own merit instead of who says it. Same as how when a murderer says that the sky is blue, nobody is going to say that this statement is "murderous" just because it was uttered by a murderer. But apparently Questerrr thinks otherwise.

Present-day White Nationalists are different from Nazis, who were from a by-gone era in a totally different country. For you to say what you say, I am pretty sure you have no idea what White Nationalism is all about and you are just mindlessly regurgitating what you have learned from the mainstream media.

Then prove that my question has a "faulty premise". Sounds to me like you couldn't answer a very straightforward question and you are now squirming and wriggling, trying to get out of it.

Huh? The answer is supposed to have come from the person being asked the question, not Socrates. You don't know what you are talking about.

It's not my "opinion". It's the way that is generally agreed upon as to how a debate is supposed to work. If you disagree with this, you don't have to participate in debates. You are also free to refuse to answer any question. However, people are also free to conclude that you have lost the debate.

True, there are some good black people. However, there are more "bad" ones who literally want to see white people dead.

 

Amazing how much Marxism has warped the world. Jews, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Native Americans, and every other non-white group is free to advocate on their own behalf in order to help their group succeed, but whites are not allowed to do this. Whites are expected to participate in their own decline and help other groups rise up. No other race does this to itself.

 

Why would I do that? Didn't you just finish talking about how New Hampshire has such a low crime rate?

White America would have a very low percentage of minorities and an overwhelming white majority, like in the case of your state.

 

So you admit that there are no problems here in New Hampshire, and whites co-exist with minorities peacefully. Like I said.

And as to your last sentence, you want a majority of white people and just a handful of tokens. Very racist. Maybe you should consider moving to Siberia or Scandinavia.

 

On what planet is it "generally agreed upon as how a debate is supposed to work" that one must answer off-topic and irrelevant questions?

 

Like I said, your analysis isn't very accurate for New Hampshire. Whites are living co-existing peacefully with other whites in your state, overwhelmingly to the tune of 93%.

Scandinavia is under the same demographic assault as the US. Every majority white country is being pressured into accepting "diversity", for you see, it's racist for there to be any country with a homogenous white population. Minorities are entitled to every society that whites have created for themselves.

 

No, I was correct. We live peacefully here. With some of those icky minorities, no less. You can't even find a single instance of a race riot here. Because they don't exist.

Things sound terrible for you. Maybe you should move off the grid with some white people and you don't have to tinkle your underpants about those terrible minorities who are ruining your life.

 

You live peacefully in an overwhelmingly white state with a very small amount of minorities. That's not a surprise. That's why people like me want there to be areas like these in the future.

Or maybe I can just move to an overwhelmingly white state like you did? Maybe you should move to a more "diverse" part of the country since you love diversity so much?