When Islamic ‘occupation of Europe’ becomes a reality

Op-ed: If Western European countries fail to wake up soon, they may find out within several decades—or maybe even by the end of the century—that the Muslims have become a majority in the population. The jihadists' terror attacks in the continent are just the beginning.
Islam doesn't necessarily need murderous terror attacks to take over the continent. Any intelligent person understands that if Western European countries fail to wake up soon, they may find out within several decades—or maybe even by the end of the century—that the Muslims have become a majority in the population. Not only is the natural growth among Muslims much higher (some say 10 times higher) than the natural growth of any other group in the population, but huge waves of immigration from Islamic countries in Africa and the Middle East keep flooding the continent. If this immigration continues, the portend of “an occupation of Europe” will turn into a reality.
Let’s take Britain, for example. Islam is today the second biggest religion in the country, every third child who is born there is given the name “Muhammad” in its different variations, and the Muslim communities in its main cities are only growing. Some of them have Muslim quarters that are essentially run as autonomies.Many of the millions of Muslims living in the kingdom are second- and third-generation immigrants from countries that used to live under the rule of the “Empire” and whose residents automatically received a British citizenship. For example, the parents of Sadiq Khan, London’s Muslim mayor, arrived in Britain from Pakistan in the 1960s. Khan is an example of a successful integration, but he is not the exception that proves the rule. By the way, in a survey conducted about a year ago only 44 percent of London’s residents described themselves as “white British.”Statements, protest marches or attempts to engage in a dialogue with imams will do no good when it comes to terror. The only thing that will work in this case are drastic measures making it possible to thwart attacks before they take place, even if they involve a violation of what the West refers to as “human rights.” Instead of “neutralizing” terrorists and prosecuting them after they carry out an attack, doing everything—and at all costs—to prevent the execution of a terror attack.
https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-5013507,00.html

It will happen closer .. much closer .. than you think !

 

Can one take such a mental scrap and garbage seriously?

Slowly it becomes only ridiculous and boring when these Islam haters and fear-makers puke their mental scrap!

Must I - a convinced atheist - now really waste my time to refute such again and again blabbered BS which declares about 2 billion people on this planet as sub-humans which need to be fought in consequence of it? No... it is like convincing people who believe bible is the only truth and dinosaurs died about 50,000 years ago or so with real scientific backed facts.

 

Judging by the terror events this year...

... it already has.

 

Must be why recently they had to let a building burn in a no go zone. Too peaceful.

 

If you hate child rapist, sociopathic religious fanatics, or generational inbreeding; then it's natural to hate Islam.

Piss off with the "Oh you're anti Islam." Nonsense. Anyone with an IQ over 85 is anti Islam for the benefit of the human species.

 

If you hate child rapists and sociopathic religious fanatics then its natural to hate <insert religion of choice here>.

ALL RELIGIOUS FANATICS are nutbar apostates regardless of their faith as everyone with a IQ of over 85 knows.

 

One would think an atheist, being aware of the history of religion would at least show some concern.

I think looking at history might give one an idea of where this could go. So when islam invaded parts of europe in the past, what happened to those culture? Was islam benign or something else?

It is weird to see an atheist basically defend islam, the worst of the abrahamic based religions, proven by simply observing what kind of cultures have been created in the middle east by muslims. And is this what one might want influencing and affecting other non islamic cultures in europe? Just given the birth rates of europeans compared to the birth rates of muslims should logically infer something, a potential danger on down the road. And if it does not, especially with an atheist, one wonders why not? The atheists I personally know are very concerned with islam, given that unlike christianity and judaism seem incapable of modernizing and changing to interact with a modern world. These people are still mentally in the 8th century, and are so resistant to change, to modernization in their beliefs.

I have nothing against islam and how they want to live, what sort of culture they want. Just keep them within their own borders and leave them alone. But this religion has nothing to offer the west and nothing good can come from their influx into the west coupled with their birthrates. Caution is called for, and knee jerking into islamic hatred serves no one except the emotional state of those hurling it.

 

A religion that has nothing to offer "the west"? And here I was thinking that religion was all about a person's relationship with god, not with geopolitics.

It ain't the religion that's the problem, its ALWAYS some practioner's interpretation of their religion's doctrine that is the problem.

 

Yeah, except the ideology constantly breeds higher ups that are extremely radical, violent, and generally anti-human rights. It's been that way for over 1,000 years.

For some reason, people seem to be blind to that fact.

Guess which countries lead the world in mutilation of female genitalia? You know what I'm talking about, cutting off the clitoris against the will of the female.

Guess which countries stone gays, throws gays off of buildings, and generally murder gays in an extremely violent way?

Guess which countries regularly purge off members of the other religious group whenever they switch up the power structure?

Guess which countries women can be killed for adultery in?

Guess which countries strip nearly all common rights across the planet in place for a law that demands the individuality be removed?

 

The reason Europe has so many Muslims is because of the US's wars for Israel, creating 10s of thousands of refugees , fleeing their own countries that were being destroyed.
Libya, Iraq and Syria are the main countries involved.

 

They have been having massive influxes of Muslims ever since they shut down their Mideastern colonies.

 

For a 'convinced atheist' you seem to get very excited over some criticism of Islam. And you did that without even referring to the points made.

Islam is a religious/political movement that offers nothing whatsoever to humankind and doesn't get near the criticism it deserves.. As a clear-headed atheist you should be able to see that.

 

Russian troll?

 

Essentially it already has thanks to the brain-dead liberati, and I hope global jihadists are grateful to them! Regretfully, and I wouldn't have thought in a million years I'd ever be saying this, the first thing that needs to be done is change 'innocent until proven guilty' to 'guilty until proven innocent'. But even that won't stop it, it'll merely slow it down a bit. Oh well, no point in shutting the stable door when the horse has bolted.

 

Absolutely nothing like this volume of people

 

Where does it say we need to accept refugees if we destroy their countries?

 

Exactly. The vast majority of any religion doesn't make up their own theologies. They are taught these theologies by their religious leaders. "Radical" Muslims are not radical at all. They are following the religious precepts of Mohammed himself.

 

I base my hatred of Islam on three pillars :
_ The behaviour Muhammed had : The behaviour of Muhammed is considered as the pinnacle of human behaviour as could be considered the behaviour of Jesus for christian or the behaviour of Buddha for buddhist. And what did Muhammed ? He raided caravans, executed prisonners of war, enslaved their wives and children, ordered the execution of people, ordered the slaughter of people because of their religious inclination.
How could we accept that such behaviour could be raised as pinnacle of what a human being be ? Do you think that genocide and enslavement is fine ?
_ The islamic scriptures : the islamic scripture is composed mainly of two corpus : the book of the quran and the hadith. The book of the quran is considered as the direct word of quran, when the hadith is the gathering of many reports of Muhammed sayings or acts. They're classified considering their credibility. They're considered lower than the quran in term of authority, but muslim laws sometimes use more the hadith than the quran. Both texts are extremly violent. Furthermore, many prescriptions of the quran or the hadith are extremly precise :"to the thief, cut the hand", "give 50 lash to women who cheat their husband and feel no mercy", "Women should have half the part of a men in legacy". They're as much law text than religious text. Do you feel their is a lot of interpretation possible in those kind of texts ? I'm quoting from memory, but the spirit is here. Their is a systematic scorn of women who are considered more as pet than real human being. The way Muhammed tell to respect women is as close than some people tell to respect their pet. Women should be always obedient and their consent when sleeping with doesn't seems to be a big concern as long they're married or enslaved.
_ The reality of islamic majorities country : their is no countries where muslims are a majority where women have equal right to men, where apostate are safe and religious minorities not persecuted. Even the "moderate" muslim countries are radical in many ways.

 

You're probably talking about that breitbart article in which they made that claim.
I have a friend in Malmö and will get in touch with him.

 

I believe it is called Hirjah. (don't know if I spelled it right) It is another way to conquer. Sharia law will become common, and European culture will gradually disappear.

I find it sad, but I don't hate anyone.

 

No need. Here is a machine translation of the police report:

2017-09-07 20:51, Fire, Malmö

Fire, Old Farm Road.

Two cars on fire in a parking lot at Old farm road in Malmö. Rescue services and police alerted to the address.

Barely ten minutes later burns it in a standalone sophus on Sörbäcksgatan, an address that is located a few hundred meters from the Old farm road. By extinguishing the blaze of sophuset, thrown bottles at emergency services personnel and vehicles. Emergency services are therefore forced to interrupt their work, with total damage at sophuset as a result.

The police, arriving to the site, will also be påkastade with at least one glass bottle. There is currently no information on damage to the emergency services or police personnel and vehicles.

It is not currently known if there is any connection between the two fires.
Organization
Police Skåne

https://polisen.se/Skane/Aktuellt/Handelser/Skane/2017-09-07-2051-Brand-Malmo/

(emphasis mine)

 

And you don't think that the governments of europe and just about everywhere else on the planet werent' at times radical, violent and didn't give a crap out human rights? and that's over a couple thousand years.

For some reason people seem to be blind to this fact.

Which has nothing to do with Islam itself. Its a cultural tradition based on that cultures notions of "chastity". there isn't any mention of anything like that in the Quran.

I dunno, yours?

Do you mean like when a new government takes power and throws out the previous governments cronies?
I'd have to say just about every damn country does it on one form or another.

Afghanistan, Brunei, Iran, Maldives, Mauritania, Nigeria, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, United Arab Emirates, Yemen

Bigger list of countries and even states where its still illegal and punishable by such wonderful things as lashings, fines and even jail time. Not to mention the legal liabilities now associated with such a dastardly sin.

What?

 

You're not accepting refugees, we in Europe are.

 

You didn't answer my question.