Alabama Voters Back To Moore, Nov. 30

Sorry
I forgot you are the Rust Belt man into privacy too.
Rust Belt can mean Rockford, Illinois and similar lesser known Detroits
and are hardly, small towns. Do you agree?

 

The latest poll shows Jones with a lead (Gravis), but with the vast majority of White evangelicals ignoring the moral depravity, and many probably lying to pollsters because they are ashamed to openly admit to voting for the molester, I expect the degenerate to be infesting the Senate in January.

The stench will adhere to all GOP candidates in'18. Alabama may be hellbent on sending a Republican to Washington, but, in doing so, they'll be promoting quite a few Democrats in regions of America with ethical standards.

​

 

You mean such ethical standards as due process in a court of law?
Of course not.
Popular truth is as good as real truth, ain't it.

Remember Straus Kahn.
Stop the Witch Trials.

 

No, I don't confuse elections with criminal trials. That would be silly.

One need only apply common sense.

On the one hand you have multiple individuals consistently testifying to an observed pattern that fits the accounts of his victims - self-confessed Republican voters with no partisan agenda who reluctantly shared their experiences when tracked down and encouraged to do so.

On the other hand you have an ambitious politician whose incentive is to lie in the face of what was clearly common knowledge is obvious.

As so many Republican politicians and Trumps own daughter have stated, the women are entirely credible.

Folks can recognize that he is lying and still vote for him, and many will.

 

"I support Roy Moore."

 

Yes. Of course.
Common sense may rule over due process.
How silly of Moi not to recognize that.

Please, enlighten me to the role of due process.
Your similar on this subject, Golem, never so enlightens.
Instead it is all about we know it by common knowledge. Guilty until proven innocent.

People of higher morality do not buy into that argument, y'see.

Due Process is the law of the land.
Live with it.


Moi

r > g

Stop Creeping ism
Across an immense, unguarded, ethereal border, Canadians, cool and unsympathetic,
regard our America with envious eyes and slowly and surely draw their plans against us.
Guilty until proven innocent! Amen.​

 

There's pretty much no doubt that the GOP will elect a kid toucher

 

Your lying persists. By persisting in your ad hominem lie, you discredit yourself.

 

Actually you don't see at all and I doubt you ever will. Every man is owed his day in court, especially child molesters because the guilty under common law are hung. Better a guilty man go free than an innocent man be hung. But not in your little world where the propaganda trail of public opinion pronounces someone guilty based on accusations without one single shred of evidence but will still lose the election where this will all fall by the way side and all the accusers will shoulder the blame. And the use of real "bleeding heart" sympathy "it's the children" cry when it's not about the children at all otherwise Hitlerly and Slick Willie, you know Haiti? Stealing children? Tried to claim they were orphans?

But no, it's the guy that liked young girls back in the days of Alabama where a 14 year old girl could marry with her parents permission. But is that ever mentioned? No, that would be self-defeating when the goal is to infer some ex post facto claim.

After showing that you like to stretch the truth, why am I to trust your aren't lying now also? It's just your word and you have shown you don't take that seriously. So is it that you have never voted or should I wait for these criminals to be convicted and look for your denial of having voted for them?

With your shown lack of judgement, how can one take anything you say seriously? That is why in a previous post I thought you would has been a great professor at a college. You fit right in with the crowd.

By the way, it's "bleeding heart". In your world an extension of that would be the "Social Justice Warrior".

 

The defense of this Kid Toucher is just astounding

 

Again, you appear to be confused. "Due process" is a judicial, not an elective principle.

Political candidates are elected or rejected by the public. In an election, they are not ruled "guilty" or "innocent"

The majority of the public, Republicans as well as Democrats, recognizing that Moore molested teenagers does not involve a criminal sentence;
it does not even preclude Alabamans from electing him.

​

 

Wow.
And you got proof for the bold font statement above.


And please don't edit Moi's quotes without noting it.
It seems such editing serves lies and cheap shots too often that the whole quote would not support.

 

You're not even a LITTLE embarrassed that you support a Child Molester?

 

Your not even a LITTLE embarrassed to term anyone a Child Molester
without due process?

 

Really, even when you misquote an author to try and instill how educated you where and I thought that really illustrated the truth. But you are correct your post don't reflect your educated at all. What is starting to amaze me is this hang up you are having on this "basic course in sex-ed" (and you never did answer if you learned from the priest or the nun). Was there something that caused you a problem in this basic course?

I haven't pronounced any such thing. I have pronounced him innocent as he hasn't been convicted. There isn't even a case filled in any competent court of law to even start conviction. The court of popular opinion or better stated the court of the entitled has no jurisdiction anywhere. It carries no weight except to the ignorant.

Here you go with that crystal ball rhetoric clouding your judgement. The things where you would have a better understanding than I would be things that really don't matter in life. Why you would even attempt to discuss anything at law is beyond me. It's pretty obvious you have no clue about the subject matter.

Here I have no doubt you can hold your own. A world where facts don't matter, it's the expediency of the moment. Political election where the losers will try any cheap trick they can pull to win. But it seems again as in Georgia, as in Hitlerly's vain attempt, they will again just be what they have always been, losers.

Or you can make your decision based on no politics, I'm a political atheist. While their are huge differences in the worshipers of the red and blue religion, their is absolutely no difference in the actors that represent them nor the master to which they serve.

 

But I showed the very thread in which you are doing exactly what I described.

 

Nope. I believe that girl. Why wouldn't I Not only does she have nothing to gain but she was a Trump voting Republican. She also told people about it AT THE TIME.

How could you support a child molester?

 

For the hundredth time... this is not a legal case. And it's not about Roy Moore.

It's about those who would put a pedophile in the Senate. And those who would support him.

Did you ever see anybody asking for "a day in court" for a candidate that promised to lower taxes, or give healthcare to everybody, or build a wall and make Mexico pay for it" or "free College tuition for everybody"

Why is it that nobody ever demand "proof" or "a day in court" for politicians who promise those things before they get your support, but you demand it about a person who abuses children?

The crime has prescribed. He cannot go to jail. And the guy doesn't need or want "a day in court" But that doesn't mean it's OK for him to go to the Senate. Now... does he deserve your support? Your answering "yes" to this question makes a statement about you. Not about Roy Moore

 

If you had proof you would of posted it here instead of making baseless claims

 

I am glad you can make with 100% surety he molested kids and that his support molestation...

If you have proof why not post it.

 

Why wouldn't you?
Oh I don't know.
Maybe the promise of $ $ $
has influenced the girl.
It's been known to happen.

Alleged child molesters deserve their day in court too
before I would let it effect my vote.

Remember Straus Kahn
And the Red Scare Too.
Being accused of being a Communist was as good as being one. No due process.

And happiness too
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...-back-to-moore-nov-30.520095/#post-1068333145 #1 this thread

 

Misquote?

Are you serious? You actually don't know what the word "paraphrasing" means?

Ok. So you are officially a waste of my time.

 

But it is nothing compared to the level of depravity to which some will stoop to get a loser to win an election. Especially considering the level of depravity of Obama which can't even hold a candle to the evil of the Clintons. And you really want other's to somehow believe anything that could throw another election. While those Odumbocraps were quite successful into deluding one of their own, just haven't been able to take that act public and make it last, seems like that scam has run it's course except of course the 2020 Odumbocrap primaries.

So with Hitlerly rotting somewhere and Bernie riding off into the sunset, will it be Pocahontas that rises from the ashes to behead that vile creature, King Donald.

 

Paraphrasing is not adding words to change the entire quote to your means. Therefore it should be I, not YOU, that is asking if you knew what the word paraphrasing means.

That would make me serious in case you have an issue arriving at the correct conclusion.