Why tax cuts don't create business growth.

Bull! Your posts in this thread show a total ignorance of basic tax law. You don't have a company.

 

Actually not. We could be having an intelligent conversation but you seem to be stuck in everyone on the left is a socialist silliness. Go ahead and have that ignorant conversation with yourself.

 

Apparently you are incapable of a counter argument. But then that has always been the case.

 

Great.
More money for no extra work.

That is an increased incentive to work.
An increased incentive to invest.

 

You continue to spout leftist drivel such as "corporate taxes don't run off domestic companies abroad", "more money in my pocket disincentivizes production",and "progressive taxes equalizes society", it does not.
Corporations are really pass through shells to which distributions to owners, investors, and employees are made. The less they are taxed, the more those are enriched. Investors and employees spend these funds directly into the economy, fueling more growth and more tax dollars to the federal coffers. There is nothing intelligent about your ruse.

 

That's nonsensical as the total costs of the guitars does not even come close to the value of the tax deduction.

Only an idiot spends $1 for the purpose of saving 38 cents.

 

I wonder why it is that whenever I look into the economic data supplied by the US government that it always disagrees with conservative claims. It might be that conservative economic ideology is so out of whack with reality that conservatives have to lie to support it?

 

Unless they really love smashing guitars on stage.

 

Well then I suppose you have made a point that they "Must" be hypocrites by this very admission

 

The point being if my company pays less taxes, I make more money with no more effort. Why would I work harder?

 

I'm always amused that Warren Buffet is a big mouthed lib who whines his tax rates are too low. Funny, IRS auditors were in Bershire's offices for about 8 years and slapped them with 1 billion in back taxes.
Dilly dilly!!

 

Because your wife is spending every penny you saved from the cuts. (pun intended, she's pumping up the economy)

 

The best part is, from time to time the left allow themselves to slip up stating fakes and facts and yet they "STILL" follow them blindly

Dilly DILLY!

 

One of the lies conservatives like to tell is that all the rich people are Republicans. Yet when one looks into it one finds at least half lean liberal.


Conservatives also like to lie that everyone on the left is a socialist.

It isn't that people on the left are hypocrites. It is more that conservatives like to make up their own facts, which explains the confusion of conservatives.

 

The sound of Buffet just whooshed right over your head. Shocked I say. Shocked!!!!

 

It's possible that their "business" is a government contractor, not a legitimate private sector business. As long as the "contractor" part of the gov-edu-union-contractor-grantee-trial lawyer-MSM Complex can keep selling $4 plastic forks and 10,000 other ripoffs of the taxpayer, they really don't care what the tax rate is, they will still come out on top of the scam. Government contracting has grown at least 500% and likely much more since the 1980s. More taxes just means a bigger prospective trough.

They will never admit this, but instead make all kinds of nonsense claims about tax policy, rates, private sector business, the rich, the poor, the middle class, and other miscellaneous hokum. See OP's posts in this thread and elsewhere for examples.

 

Leftist work ethics 101 Not bad really, generally it's "Why would I work" if I can draw <insert social program here> LMFAO.

 

I'll have to have fun with you silly conservatives another time. But now I've got a business to run.

 

Actually, everyone knows there are rich liberals, we just get a kick out them telling their lemmings how the "The Rich" are taking advantage of them, and they walk right off the cliff without even giving that a single thought

Eyes wide shut

 

Has time to necro their own two week old dead thread, yet doesn't have time to defend all the inaccurate nonsense they posted in it because "I've got a business to run."

Yep, leftist. Checks out.

 

That is because it is nonsense. The overwhelming amount of stock, about 80% is owned by the rich.

 

Regan increased government spending by 2.5 percent a year as well as tripling the federal debt. Not a strong endorsement of his tax cuts.

 

Wrong. 80% of -public- equity, .02% of the companies in the country, may be owned by the rich, but equity in the other 29,995,000 private businesses, 99% of U.S. companies, is most definitely -not- 80% owned by "the rich."

Pick a less out of context leftist liestat next time if you want to fool anyone with actual business experience.

 

Wrong again. Not surprised. Reagan had a Democrat controlled Congress to deal with, and the 1980s tax reforms were revenue neutral, not just "tax cuts." Moreover, in light of the fact that those reforms were so successful that they have been around through 5 subsequent Administrations without much change made them no longer "his tax cuts" decades ago. They are today, simply and accurately, federal tax policy. Reasonable adults do not call Social Security "FDR's Social Security" or Medicare "LBJ's Medicare." There are no "Reagan tax cuts" and haven't been for many years.

 

So then your position is that of damn the 20% in a feeble attempt to ruin the rich, well that's interesting LOLOL